w203 vs w204
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: riviere-heva,quebec,canada
c320 2002,f-150 1997,ford fusion 2006
w203 vs w204
HI
I have a c320 2002 sedan ( 240 000 km) and I check to change for a c350 4matic sport/premium pack 2009 (70 000 km).
I want your idea on the car I want buy ?
the w204 it is better fiability than w203 ?
I will have many problems with my c320...the bigger problems I will have is rust.the w204 does it have this problems.
and what is imnportant to check on a c350 4matic...before buy it
thanks
I have a c320 2002 sedan ( 240 000 km) and I check to change for a c350 4matic sport/premium pack 2009 (70 000 km).
I want your idea on the car I want buy ?
the w204 it is better fiability than w203 ?
I will have many problems with my c320...the bigger problems I will have is rust.the w204 does it have this problems.
and what is imnportant to check on a c350 4matic...before buy it
thanks
Last edited by wwwiiilll; Jun 10, 2012 at 10:28 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
HI
I have a c320 2002 sedan ( 240 000 km) and I check to change for a c350 4matic sport/premium pack 2009 (70 000 km).
I want your idea on the car I want buy ?
the w204 it is better fiability than w203 ?
I will have many problems with my c320...the bigger problems I will have is rust.the w204 does it have this problems.
and what is imnportant to check on a c350 4matic...before buy it
thanks
I have a c320 2002 sedan ( 240 000 km) and I check to change for a c350 4matic sport/premium pack 2009 (70 000 km).
I want your idea on the car I want buy ?
the w204 it is better fiability than w203 ?
I will have many problems with my c320...the bigger problems I will have is rust.the w204 does it have this problems.
and what is imnportant to check on a c350 4matic...before buy it
thanks
We do not have the word "fiability", but I am guessing you mean "reliability"...how many problems will it have. The 204 has been much more reliable than the 203 and may be one of Mercedes Benz's most reliable vehicles. Nothing is perfect, and there are some problems, but overall, it is doing very well. I have read no reports about any rust on any 204.
My car is also a 2009, like the one you are considering, and it has been excellent for 4 years. At 70,000km, however, you can expect some maintenance items to be required, so do not be surprised if brakes, tires, or struts need replacement. The quality continued to improve in 2010 when the car won a prize for being the best quality in its class. If you can find a 2010 with fewer kilometers, you may do even better.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
Disagree. Rust is not a problem of insufficient wax on a unbroken paint surface. There is a long history of cars with inherent engineering/design problems which prompted corrosion from the inside out. In many cases, the paint was the last surface to fail as the metal disintegrated beneath it. I don't know from personal experience if the W203 is among them, and longer-standing MB owners can chime in, but the phenomenon is well documented in auto history.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 4
From: NYC
2012 C300 4Matic
Sportstick has it right. Up until 2005 the W203s were experiencing a lot of rust in the bottom of the doors as well as the fenders. Had nothing to do with the paint. Had everything to do with retaining water in certain areas, improper galvanization, and complete lack of galvanization (Mercedes has done some very stupid things in the past) until a certain year (I've forgotten which year exactly...).
My W203 was a complete piece of junk. Dozens of major problems. So far my W204 has had only 1 very small problem - the sunroof makes loud 'cracking' sounds when I hit bumps and the body of the car flexes. Haven't taken it in for the problem yet.
Last edited by acr2001; Jun 10, 2012 at 02:56 PM.
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 116
Likes: 5
From: Canada
2011 C250 4matic
This is incorrect!
Sportstick has it right. Up until 2005 the W203s were experiencing a lot of rust in the bottom of the doors as well as the fenders. Had nothing to do with the paint. Had everything to do with retaining water in certain areas, improper galvanization, and complete lack of galvanization (Mercedes has done some very stupid things in the past) until a certain year (I've forgotten which year exactly...).
My W203 was a complete piece of junk. Dozens of major problems. So far my W204 has had only 1 very small problem - the sunroof makes loud 'cracking' sounds when I hit bumps and the body of the car flexes. Haven't taken it in for the problem yet.
Sportstick has it right. Up until 2005 the W203s were experiencing a lot of rust in the bottom of the doors as well as the fenders. Had nothing to do with the paint. Had everything to do with retaining water in certain areas, improper galvanization, and complete lack of galvanization (Mercedes has done some very stupid things in the past) until a certain year (I've forgotten which year exactly...).
My W203 was a complete piece of junk. Dozens of major problems. So far my W204 has had only 1 very small problem - the sunroof makes loud 'cracking' sounds when I hit bumps and the body of the car flexes. Haven't taken it in for the problem yet.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
Nope...among luxury cars, that would be Lexus, but you trade off several other benefits which "drive" people to choose a MB. Far more MBs have been on Consumer Reports "used cars to avoid" list than we'll ever see Lexus. But, far more MB owners enjoy driving their cars while more Lexus folks float along softly and a bit detached. Figure out how many "things gone wrong" you are willing to tolerate to balance out the "things gone right", and you'll know what luxury brand you want.
Last edited by Sportstick; Jun 10, 2012 at 03:05 PM.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 116
Likes: 5
From: Canada
2011 C250 4matic
Nope...among luxury cars, that would be Lexus, but you trade off several other benefits which "drive" people to choose a MB. Far more MBs have been on Consumer Reports "used cars to avoid" list than we'll ever see Lexus. But, far more MB owners enjoy driving their cars while more Lexus folks float along softly and a bit detached. Figure out how many "things gone wrong" you are willing to tolerate to balance out the "things gone right", and you'll know what luxury brand you want.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
Not sure what number crosses the line into "bad", but it varies by model and year. Residual value is based on supply and demand, and even a less than perfect reliability auto with high demand can have high residual value. There are sites where you can compare used car values, and a bank or dealer can tell you current ALG projected residual values which they use for financing leases.
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 116
Likes: 5
From: Canada
2011 C250 4matic
Not sure what number crosses the line into "bad", but it varies by model and year. Residual value is based on supply and demand, and even a less than perfect reliability auto with high demand can have high residual value. There are sites where you can compare used car values, and a bank or dealer can tell you current ALG projected residual values which they use for financing leases.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: riviere-heva,quebec,canada
c320 2002,f-150 1997,ford fusion 2006
merci beaucoup...thank you
thank a lot SPORTSTICK...I am reassured (google traduction )
AND TO JamesKim I DONT THINK WAX WILL ELIMINATED THE PROBLEMS OF RUST...CHECK IN ALL THE FORUMS AND YOU FIND THIS PROBLEMS MANY TIME.MY SON HAVE A HYUNDAI ACCENT 1999 WITH 200 000 KM AND DONT HAVE RUST LIKE THIS AND DONT HAVE 2 PAINT JOB ON HIS CAR.I LOVE MY CAR BUT I AM NOT BLIND...MERCEDES W203 IS NOT A RELIABILITY CAR...SORRY ITS THE REALITY.
AND TO JamesKim I DONT THINK WAX WILL ELIMINATED THE PROBLEMS OF RUST...CHECK IN ALL THE FORUMS AND YOU FIND THIS PROBLEMS MANY TIME.MY SON HAVE A HYUNDAI ACCENT 1999 WITH 200 000 KM AND DONT HAVE RUST LIKE THIS AND DONT HAVE 2 PAINT JOB ON HIS CAR.I LOVE MY CAR BUT I AM NOT BLIND...MERCEDES W203 IS NOT A RELIABILITY CAR...SORRY ITS THE REALITY.
With this being an international forum, we realize English is not your first language, so good work on describing your questions!
We do not have the word "fiability", but I am guessing you mean "reliability"...how many problems will it have. The 204 has been much more reliable than the 203 and may be one of Mercedes Benz's most reliable vehicles. Nothing is perfect, and there are some problems, but overall, it is doing very well. I have read no reports about any rust on any 204.
My car is also a 2009, like the one you are considering, and it has been excellent for 4 years. At 70,000km, however, you can expect some maintenance items to be required, so do not be surprised if brakes, tires, or struts need replacement. The quality continued to improve in 2010 when the car won a prize for being the best quality in its class. If you can find a 2010 with fewer kilometers, you may do even better.
We do not have the word "fiability", but I am guessing you mean "reliability"...how many problems will it have. The 204 has been much more reliable than the 203 and may be one of Mercedes Benz's most reliable vehicles. Nothing is perfect, and there are some problems, but overall, it is doing very well. I have read no reports about any rust on any 204.
My car is also a 2009, like the one you are considering, and it has been excellent for 4 years. At 70,000km, however, you can expect some maintenance items to be required, so do not be surprised if brakes, tires, or struts need replacement. The quality continued to improve in 2010 when the car won a prize for being the best quality in its class. If you can find a 2010 with fewer kilometers, you may do even better.
Last edited by wwwiiilll; Jun 10, 2012 at 09:04 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 57
From: Southwest USA
Another round of ICE
thank a lot SPORTSTICK...I am reassured (google traduction )
AND TO JamesKim I DONT THINK WAX WILL ELIMINATED THE PROBLEMS OF RUST...CHECK IN ALL THE FORUMS AND YOU FIND THIS PROBLEMS MANY TIME.MY SON HAVE A HYUNDAI ACCENT 1999 WITH 200 000 KM AND DONT HAVE RUST LIKE THIS AND DONT HAVE 2 PAINT JOB ON HIS CAR.I LOVE MY CAR BUT I AM NOT BLIND...MERCEDES W203 IS NOT A RELIABILITY CAR...SORRY ITS THE REALITY.
AND TO JamesKim I DONT THINK WAX WILL ELIMINATED THE PROBLEMS OF RUST...CHECK IN ALL THE FORUMS AND YOU FIND THIS PROBLEMS MANY TIME.MY SON HAVE A HYUNDAI ACCENT 1999 WITH 200 000 KM AND DONT HAVE RUST LIKE THIS AND DONT HAVE 2 PAINT JOB ON HIS CAR.I LOVE MY CAR BUT I AM NOT BLIND...MERCEDES W203 IS NOT A RELIABILITY CAR...SORRY ITS THE REALITY.
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Rust on the W203 was production plant dependent. Brazil worst. Never any rust problems on SA production at all - zero. 10 year perforation warranty.
