Dynamic Handling ?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Dynamic Handling ?
Hi everyone, just got home from a long exhaustive day and was wondering during my commute(after driving my brothers W204 with DHP during lunch).... has anyone ever retrofitted the dynamic handling package to non DHP W204? And can it be done without breaking bank and reinventing the wheel??
I can care less about the paddle shifters, just interested in the quicker sharper steering and throttle response and tighter suspension settings!!!
I would love to hear what everyone has to say on the issue..
Cheers,
I can care less about the paddle shifters, just interested in the quicker sharper steering and throttle response and tighter suspension settings!!!
I would love to hear what everyone has to say on the issue..
Cheers,
Last edited by IRIDIUMSILVER; 06-27-2012 at 09:22 PM.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Hi everyone, just got home from a long exhaustive day and was wondering during my commute(after driving my brothers W204 with DHP during lunch).... has anyone ever retrofitted the dynamic handling package to non DHP W204? And can it be done without breaking bank and reinventing the wheel??
I can care less about the paddle shifters, just interested in the quicker sharper steering and throttle response and tighter suspension settings!!!
I would love to hear what everyone has to say on the issue..
Cheers,
I can care less about the paddle shifters, just interested in the quicker sharper steering and throttle response and tighter suspension settings!!!
I would love to hear what everyone has to say on the issue..
Cheers,
This leaves the throttle response unresolved, but does make for a big smile-maker from the chassis. My comments on throttle may be of less value, as I have a manual trans, and it seems most of the concerns on this forum relate to auto trans lag in responding. Not sure what you're saying about the paddle shifters...you can care less, so they do matter to you, or you can NOT care less, so they don't? Some have retrofitted paddles with a steering wheel upgrade, but that is also costly.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
"SportStick" thanks for corresponding... coincidentally I have feeling that It can be done on the cheap; allow me to elaborate a little. I took a peak under the hood of my brothers W204 and it has a part of its wiring harness plugged into a sensor on the passenger side shock tower(i'm assuming its to control the DHP and receives its input signal from the sport button in the center dash?) My car does not have this harness or sensor...
Now at the core of DHP is the agility control suspension(or in the DHPs case "advanced agility suspension") and as far as I know all W204s destined for the U.S. are equipped with AGILITY CONTROL from the factory.(please correct me if i'm wrong) And "IF" the dampers and springs are the same in DHP and non DHP W204s It just maybe a lot easier than we think..
Also looking at the cost of DHP $1530 + $250 s.o. charge, you get 18" AMG wheels, steering wheel shift paddles and speed sensitive steering, etc. The 18" AMG wheels alone are a $1040 stand alone option + who knows what steering wheel and paddle shifter hardware would be/are worth.. I would estimate any where in the ball park park of $250-$450?(as a option if it were available)
So looking at the numbers, I cant help but think that DHP can be retrofitted in its essence(sharper steering, faster throttle response, taughter suspension damping) sans steering wheel with shift paddles(redundant imp) and 18" AMG wheels relatively easy with a harness swap and shock tower sensor and some programing from star diagnosis?
So to make a long speculative convoluted post short, I feel in theory(mine) that the DHP option apart from the wheels and steering wheel is simply fancy programming(and brilliant one at that) that can be easily replicated with the correct sensors, harnesses and plugs. But then again what do I know???
Cheers,
Now at the core of DHP is the agility control suspension(or in the DHPs case "advanced agility suspension") and as far as I know all W204s destined for the U.S. are equipped with AGILITY CONTROL from the factory.(please correct me if i'm wrong) And "IF" the dampers and springs are the same in DHP and non DHP W204s It just maybe a lot easier than we think..
Also looking at the cost of DHP $1530 + $250 s.o. charge, you get 18" AMG wheels, steering wheel shift paddles and speed sensitive steering, etc. The 18" AMG wheels alone are a $1040 stand alone option + who knows what steering wheel and paddle shifter hardware would be/are worth.. I would estimate any where in the ball park park of $250-$450?(as a option if it were available)
So looking at the numbers, I cant help but think that DHP can be retrofitted in its essence(sharper steering, faster throttle response, taughter suspension damping) sans steering wheel with shift paddles(redundant imp) and 18" AMG wheels relatively easy with a harness swap and shock tower sensor and some programing from star diagnosis?
So to make a long speculative convoluted post short, I feel in theory(mine) that the DHP option apart from the wheels and steering wheel is simply fancy programming(and brilliant one at that) that can be easily replicated with the correct sensors, harnesses and plugs. But then again what do I know???
Cheers,
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
So I confirmed today that retrofitting DHP can be done with the proper engine harness, sensors and star programming.. I confirmed this today with my service manager and a few Techs at the dealership were I lease and service my M.Benz!
carry on.
carry on.
#5
Super Moderator
Yes it can be retrofitted. The question is one of cost. The cost of selecting options when the car is built is ultra low compared with retrofitting.
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
Then you have to pull the car apart to fit all this gubbins. I suggest you get a quote to perform that lot & I think your eyes will water.
If it's handling you are after the Sportstick's solution will be a lot cheaper.
Anything is possible if you have a deep wallet.
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
Then you have to pull the car apart to fit all this gubbins. I suggest you get a quote to perform that lot & I think your eyes will water.
If it's handling you are after the Sportstick's solution will be a lot cheaper.
Anything is possible if you have a deep wallet.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
I'm not sure if your proposed transplant is feasible, but it would likely be quite costly. There may be a simpler and less expensive solution to achieve some of your objectives. I swapped out my anti-sway bars for the Eibach set, and the steering response and handling were transformed..
Originally Posted by Sportstick
This leaves the throttle response unresolved, but does make for a big smile-maker from the chassis. My comments on throttle may be of less value, as I have a manual trans, and it seems most of the concerns on this forum relate to auto trans lag in responding...
Originally Posted by Sportstick
Not sure what you're saying about the paddle shifters....
Originally Posted by IRIDIUMSILVER
.... I can care less about the paddle shifters
.
Last edited by kevink2; 07-31-2012 at 01:37 PM.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
True, but one nice feature about the optional Advanced Dynamic Handling Package is the ability to turn it on and off. With Eibach bars, your always on. A compromise would be stiffer springs with a little drop, like Eibach Pro-Kit or H&R sports.
Yes, but this is a cost vs benefit analysis. As Glyn points out, a retrofit is quite expensive. I'm guessing thousands. A new car purchase decision is a different matter. Stiffer springs compromise ride comfort much more than antisway bars, which is a negative trade-off for me, but perhaps, not for him.
MB does say quicker steering and throttle response. Steering could be just from firming up the outer front shock as you start a corner. And throttle response could just be the old C vs S options for the basic 7 speed automatic. If it's more than that, then there is always the Sprint Booster.
Steering yes, but see note above. Sprint Booster....here we go again! Regardless, I don't deal with cars trying to spin fluids to get rolling!
Sportstick, how on earth can you find confusion in his opinion about paddle shifters? Perhaps problems with past participles?
This seems to be an increasing communication problem, perhaps by just copying lazy speech of others. In short, if one can care less, they consequently care more than the minimum. If one cannot care less, they are at the very bottom of any possible interest. So, to indicate total indifference, the expression should be (and used to be), "I cannot (or could not) care less". Somehow, the "not" has gotten lost for some, actually reversing the meaning. This seems to be happening among the same people who think, "I'm like" is equivalent to "I said" when quoting themselves.
.
Yes, but this is a cost vs benefit analysis. As Glyn points out, a retrofit is quite expensive. I'm guessing thousands. A new car purchase decision is a different matter. Stiffer springs compromise ride comfort much more than antisway bars, which is a negative trade-off for me, but perhaps, not for him.
MB does say quicker steering and throttle response. Steering could be just from firming up the outer front shock as you start a corner. And throttle response could just be the old C vs S options for the basic 7 speed automatic. If it's more than that, then there is always the Sprint Booster.
Steering yes, but see note above. Sprint Booster....here we go again! Regardless, I don't deal with cars trying to spin fluids to get rolling!
Sportstick, how on earth can you find confusion in his opinion about paddle shifters? Perhaps problems with past participles?
This seems to be an increasing communication problem, perhaps by just copying lazy speech of others. In short, if one can care less, they consequently care more than the minimum. If one cannot care less, they are at the very bottom of any possible interest. So, to indicate total indifference, the expression should be (and used to be), "I cannot (or could not) care less". Somehow, the "not" has gotten lost for some, actually reversing the meaning. This seems to be happening among the same people who think, "I'm like" is equivalent to "I said" when quoting themselves.
.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
The whole purpose of this exercise was to see if it can be done without any complications and with out retrofitting the whole suspension system as a whole.
-Cheers,
#9
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NNJ, CT, West Palm
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 E350, 2010 C300, 2008 R350
I made the mistake of not realizing that DHP was a 350 only option when my dealer told me that my car was equipped with it. I had someone sign the car for me when I was out of state. Upon picking it up and realizing the issue, the dealer denied telling me this (just as he lied about GPS on my fathers car). He offered 3 free details as compensation. Now I feel very silly for researching so poorly. Research is a passion of mine I'm rather embarrassed.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
.
#11
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NNJ, CT, West Palm
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 E350, 2010 C300, 2008 R350
Are you sure grasshopper? I'd talk to the parts guy/gal rather than the SA, or even some techs (that used to put the wrong amount of oil in 4MATICs). The dampers for the DHP have a wiring harness of their own, to change the magnetic flux in the damper to tighten or loosen the damper stiffness in an instant. As Glyn correctly said:
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
.
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Are you sure grasshopper? I'd talk to the parts guy/gal rather than the SA, or even some techs (that used to put the wrong amount of oil in 4MATICs). The dampers for the DHP have a wiring harness of their own, to change the magnetic flux in the damper to tighten or loosen the damper stiffness in an instant. As Glyn correctly said:
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
.
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
.
Ill double check tomorrow with parts department when I pick up my C300 - btw I really don't want to return my C250 loaner!!
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
Posted by kevink2
True, but one nice feature about the optional Advanced Dynamic Handling Package is the ability to turn it on and off. With Eibach bars, your always on. A compromise would be stiffer springs with a little drop, like Eibach Pro-Kit or H&R sports.
Reply1 from Sportstick
Yes, but this is a cost vs benefit analysis. As Glyn points out, a retrofit is quite expensive. I'm guessing thousands. A new car purchase decision is a different matter. Stiffer springs compromise ride comfort much more than antisway bars, which is a negative trade-off for me, but perhaps, not for him.
Reply2 from kevink2
Not sure what the first half of that is about. OP wants to upgrade his C300. I've had 2 street cars that I tracked in the summer. One with Eibach bars and oem springs, the other had self-fabricated 9/16" rear bar, and 1" front bar (vs 7/8" oem), and oem Race springs.
For off season, I put oem bars back on in one car vs the Eibach's. In the other car the race springs were so sfiff I just disconnected the race bars. In both cases the off season ride was much better overall vs the race set-up. So my "Eibach" car was upgraded like yours ... bars alone.
We can agree to disagree about which upgrade is better, in this specific case. IMHO, if a flatter ride is his main goal, and he has few rough roads to deal with, bars may be best. But, if rougher roads are more frequented, I'd go with the 1/2" drop ~30% stiffer springs I suggested. The fine independent suspension stays more independent with stiffer springs vs bars, and it gets a slight drop.
----------------------------------------------------
Posted by kevink2
MB does say quicker steering and throttle response. Steering could be just from firming up the outer front shock as you start a corner. And throttle response could just be the old C vs S options for the basic 7 speed automatic. If it's more than that, then there is always the Sprint Booster.
Reply from Sportstick
Steering yes, but see note above. Sprint Booster....here we go again! Regardless, I don't deal with cars trying to spin fluids to get rolling!
Reply2 by kevink2
"note above" =? SprintBooster is worth a search. Some people must use automatics, example: if disabled.
------------------------------------------------------
Posted by kevink2
Sportstick, how on earth can you find confusion in his opinion about paddle shifters? Perhaps problems with past participles?
Reply from Sportstick
This seems to be an increasing communication problem, perhaps by just copying lazy speech of others. In short, if one can care less, they consequently care more than the minimum. If one cannot care less, they are at the very bottom of any possible interest. So, to indicate total indifference, the expression should be (and used to be), "I cannot (or could not) care less". Somehow, the "not" has gotten lost for some, actually reversing the meaning. This seems to be happening among the same people who think, "I'm like" is equivalent to "I said" when quoting themselves.
Reply2 by kevink2
First, I'm disappointed you missed my alliteration. I knew the exact interpretation of the phrase, but not the evolution ( I-could-care-less ) . But somtimes one can come across as being condescending, when unnecessarily taking someone to the chalkboard.
.
True, but one nice feature about the optional Advanced Dynamic Handling Package is the ability to turn it on and off. With Eibach bars, your always on. A compromise would be stiffer springs with a little drop, like Eibach Pro-Kit or H&R sports.
Reply1 from Sportstick
Yes, but this is a cost vs benefit analysis. As Glyn points out, a retrofit is quite expensive. I'm guessing thousands. A new car purchase decision is a different matter. Stiffer springs compromise ride comfort much more than antisway bars, which is a negative trade-off for me, but perhaps, not for him.
Reply2 from kevink2
Not sure what the first half of that is about. OP wants to upgrade his C300. I've had 2 street cars that I tracked in the summer. One with Eibach bars and oem springs, the other had self-fabricated 9/16" rear bar, and 1" front bar (vs 7/8" oem), and oem Race springs.
For off season, I put oem bars back on in one car vs the Eibach's. In the other car the race springs were so sfiff I just disconnected the race bars. In both cases the off season ride was much better overall vs the race set-up. So my "Eibach" car was upgraded like yours ... bars alone.
We can agree to disagree about which upgrade is better, in this specific case. IMHO, if a flatter ride is his main goal, and he has few rough roads to deal with, bars may be best. But, if rougher roads are more frequented, I'd go with the 1/2" drop ~30% stiffer springs I suggested. The fine independent suspension stays more independent with stiffer springs vs bars, and it gets a slight drop.
----------------------------------------------------
Posted by kevink2
MB does say quicker steering and throttle response. Steering could be just from firming up the outer front shock as you start a corner. And throttle response could just be the old C vs S options for the basic 7 speed automatic. If it's more than that, then there is always the Sprint Booster.
Reply from Sportstick
Steering yes, but see note above. Sprint Booster....here we go again! Regardless, I don't deal with cars trying to spin fluids to get rolling!
Reply2 by kevink2
"note above" =? SprintBooster is worth a search. Some people must use automatics, example: if disabled.
------------------------------------------------------
Posted by kevink2
Sportstick, how on earth can you find confusion in his opinion about paddle shifters? Perhaps problems with past participles?
Reply from Sportstick
This seems to be an increasing communication problem, perhaps by just copying lazy speech of others. In short, if one can care less, they consequently care more than the minimum. If one cannot care less, they are at the very bottom of any possible interest. So, to indicate total indifference, the expression should be (and used to be), "I cannot (or could not) care less". Somehow, the "not" has gotten lost for some, actually reversing the meaning. This seems to be happening among the same people who think, "I'm like" is equivalent to "I said" when quoting themselves.
Reply2 by kevink2
First, I'm disappointed you missed my alliteration. I knew the exact interpretation of the phrase, but not the evolution ( I-could-care-less ) . But somtimes one can come across as being condescending, when unnecessarily taking someone to the chalkboard.
.
Last edited by kevink2; 08-01-2012 at 01:35 AM.
#14
Super Moderator
Are you sure grasshopper? I'd talk to the parts guy/gal rather than the SA, or even some techs (that used to put the wrong amount of oil in 4MATICs). The dampers for the DHP have a wiring harness of their own, to change the magnetic flux in the damper to tighten or loosen the damper stiffness in an instant. As Glyn correctly said:
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
.
The first things that have to be fitted are the active magnetorheological dampers all round in place of the passive ones fitted at present plus harness, controller, switching, & all fittings plus Star time.
.
#15
Super Moderator
The steering has been a steady progression & now switchable via a solenoid when you shove the DHP Sport button & yes requires it's own new harness.
The Benz progression.
Rack & Pinion.
Hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Speed sensitive hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Parametric speed & input hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Parametric speed & input hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS with variable ratio rack ~ "slower" gearing around centre.
AAC or DHP steering where boost parameters are changed from standard/default.
The throttle response is changed in the ECU to more linear from highly logarithmic.
The TCU is also interrogated to institute a more "swift" shift map.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
Glyn, do you think these are functionally the same as the C vs S selection on the basic models?
.
#17
Super Moderator
BTW - regarding steering. If your car was not ordered/spec'ed with Parametric variable ratio steering you need a new rack to achieve DHP spec.
#18
Super Moderator
Oh! Kevin ~ I meant to say that on the W204 I'm not sure what the damper reaction is to steering angle & I don't know whether they brake the inner rear wheel in a corner like some models do. (What Porsche call "Vector Steering"). I'll keep a lookout for this info.
#19
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NNJ, CT, West Palm
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 E350, 2010 C300, 2008 R350
OK ~ Further to the damping issue. The system uses three accelerometers mounted on the vehicle body and four suspension position sensors. The balance of inputs to the controller come from the standard onboard SAS (steering angle sensor) & other ESP sensors.
The steering has been a steady progression & now switchable via a solenoid when you shove the DHP Sport button & yes requires it's own new harness.
The Benz progression.
Rack & Pinion.
Hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Speed sensitive hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Parametric speed & input hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Parametric speed & input hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS with variable ratio rack ~ "slower" gearing around centre.
AAC or DHP steering where boost parameters are changed from standard/default.
The throttle response is changed in the ECU to more linear from highly logarithmic.
The TCU is also interrogated to institute a more "swift" shift map.
The steering has been a steady progression & now switchable via a solenoid when you shove the DHP Sport button & yes requires it's own new harness.
The Benz progression.
Rack & Pinion.
Hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Speed sensitive hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Parametric speed & input hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS.
Parametric speed & input hydraulically assisted Rack & Pinion PS with variable ratio rack ~ "slower" gearing around centre.
AAC or DHP steering where boost parameters are changed from standard/default.
The throttle response is changed in the ECU to more linear from highly logarithmic.
The TCU is also interrogated to institute a more "swift" shift map.
This car, with the two bolded items, +100hp, and vector steering while its a pipe dream for this level car, would be an awesome sports car while still not competing with the C63. Think more like a 335ix 4 door competitor.
I'd actually rather get a "TCU Tune" over and ECU tune on this car anyday. Too bad its not available.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
So work has kept me busy and I haven't been able to followup with the parts guys at my dealership like someone suggested, so as of now.. I stand corrected!
Cheers,
Cheers,
#22
Is it possible to buy advanced agility control and not have Dynamic handling. The Codes are the same (315). However, on the actual spec chart for the car it does not list dynamic Handling although I wanted dynamic handling. Does the code (315) mean I automatically get it in the (United states) Northeast region.
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
hello everyone;
so here i am again, same issue, but with a different w204. this time its a C250! i drove my brothers car over the weekend a C250 as well and his is equipped with DHP and boy what a difference it makes.. the steering is just sublime compared to mine(when sport button is activated) and throttle response felt a lot more linear with less turbo lag! the handling and driving characteristics were really transformed a true pleasure to drive i didn't want to give him the keys back.
well with that in mind when i order my w205 it will definitely be optioned with DHP!
so here i am again, same issue, but with a different w204. this time its a C250! i drove my brothers car over the weekend a C250 as well and his is equipped with DHP and boy what a difference it makes.. the steering is just sublime compared to mine(when sport button is activated) and throttle response felt a lot more linear with less turbo lag! the handling and driving characteristics were really transformed a true pleasure to drive i didn't want to give him the keys back.
well with that in mind when i order my w205 it will definitely be optioned with DHP!
#24
Senior Member
In regards to your comment with DHP, I am not how it is where you are. But all of the C250, C300, C350 here in Edmonton atleast come with DHP since its standard with the Avantgarde package which is standard on every car here.
Maybe advantage Canada
But even with the sport mode, yea it pics up a bit faster and tightens things up but there never was "Turbo-lag" in the first place since this is a NA-engine.
Maybe advantage Canada
But even with the sport mode, yea it pics up a bit faster and tightens things up but there never was "Turbo-lag" in the first place since this is a NA-engine.