C Class (W205) C 180 BlueTec,C 200 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec BlueEfficiency,C 250 BlueTec,C 300 BlueTec Hybridplus,C 180,C 180 BlueEfficiency,C 200,C 250,C 300,C 400 Plug-in Hybrid,C 400

Autoweek: 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-class First Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-10-2014, 02:17 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
crater64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Where GW crossed the Delaware
Posts: 124
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
16 E350 4M wagon, 70 911T
Autoweek: 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-class First Drive

Subtitle: How much class could a C-class have if a C-class could have class?

http://www.autoweek.com/article/2014...IEWS/140319999

Compare/contrast with the Automobile Magazine review posted here.
Old 03-10-2014, 03:38 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 1,390
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Cars.
Autocar:

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/...t-drive-review
Old 03-10-2014, 04:10 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 1,390
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Cars.
Autocar video review:

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-video/v...act-exec-class
Old 03-10-2014, 08:04 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBNUT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,347
Received 1,028 Likes on 745 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
The car must handle pretty well given the way that guy was driving it on the wet pavement. Still want one!
Old 03-10-2014, 08:12 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/...14-CAR-review/
Old 03-10-2014, 08:17 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
For the US market, I think the take rate on the V6 is going to be higher than they think. I personally would not buy this car with the 4 cylinder.
Old 03-10-2014, 08:24 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
ddarko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW 328i
The only thing these reviews confirm for me is that they're entirely dependent on the person driving the vehicle and writing the article. That's just how personal taste works so it isn't a criticism but it's hard to say how useful they are. Look at the difference in the impression of the same gas/petro engine - Automobile's take:

Our C250 boasts the most powerful gasoline engine currently available in Europe, a 208-hp, 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder....On paper, it does everything right. In real life, however, you sometimes wish for greater smoothness, better sound quality, and more evenly spaced gears. As it is, the transmission occasionally feels compelled to change down two or even three ratios. In response, the engine then revs to the limiter to deliver the goods, and this driveline stress is at odds with the car's otherwise commendably calm demeanor.
versus Autocar's impression of the same engine:

From the outset, the new C-class’s petrol engine, essentially the same as that used by the A and B-class, CLA and GLA-class, but turned 90-degrees to provide it with a longitudinal mounting, feels competent to drive. It accelerates Mercedes-Benz’s classy new saloon with a smooth and willing nature while providing it with commendably hushed and muted qualities at a constant cruise on the motorway.

There is very little drama, and no real need to wring the engine to tap into the performance. Peak torque of 258lb is delivered across a wide range of revs, from just 1200 through to 4000rpm, giving the C250 the sort of in-gear flexibility to satisfy even the most ardent of diesel engine admirers.
BTW, Autocar UK published two separate reviews of the C-Class, one diesel, one for the gas/petro. They think the gas engine is more refined.
Old 03-10-2014, 10:57 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
alsyli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 C250 Sport
Originally Posted by ddarko
The only thing these reviews confirm for me is that they're entirely dependent on the person driving the vehicle and writing the article.
+1. Having said that, it seems that all review agree the interior is marvelous (+/- on the nav screen) and that the refinement (overall, not necessarily engine specifically) is quite good. Can't wait to test drive one. =)
Old 03-11-2014, 10:18 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tjdehya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NM
Posts: 2,110
Received 251 Likes on 159 Posts
2023 EQS 580
I must admit that this car is Amazing. I dont see how Mercedes can sell the E class alongside this vehicle.
For 2015 I don't see why anyone would buy an E class instead of the W205 C class.
Old 03-11-2014, 10:58 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Because a new E class is coming in 2016. Its going to return to a distinctive front fascia, will have the same large screen dash enclosed COMAND and gauge screens as the S class, be a little bigger, and will move to a straight 6 engine.
Old 03-11-2014, 11:23 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nyca
Because a new E class is coming in 2016. Its going to return to a distinctive front fascia, will have the same large screen dash enclosed COMAND and gauge screens as the S class, be a little bigger, and will move to a straight 6 engine.
You have anything to back all that up? I find it hard to believe the E-class would be using an enclosed COMMAND screen when Mercedes is phasing that out in EVERYTHING else, including the upcoming GT AMG, CLS-facelift, and M-class facelift.
Old 03-12-2014, 12:24 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tjdehya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NM
Posts: 2,110
Received 251 Likes on 159 Posts
2023 EQS 580
Originally Posted by TangoRed
You have anything to back all that up? I find it hard to believe the E-class would be using an enclosed COMMAND screen when Mercedes is phasing that out in EVERYTHING else, including the upcoming GT AMG, CLS-facelift, and M-class facelift.
Nah, I am pretty sure he just made all that up. The w213 is not due till 2017, the inline 6 has been mentioned though, but not confirmed.
Old 03-13-2014, 12:25 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
djejglk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
2013 C250 sport
This is the first time I've ever heard that it's first shipping with air suspension only. How accurate could that be? I've also heard a number of "car sites" refer to the 4 cyl as a turbo, but not the v6 (they neglect to say twin-turbo). There are a lot of discrepancies going on with these "reviews" and "previews".
Old 03-13-2014, 08:46 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
ddarko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW 328i
Originally Posted by djejglk
This is the first time I've ever heard that it's first shipping with air suspension only. How accurate could that be? I've also heard a number of "car sites" refer to the 4 cyl as a turbo, but not the v6 (they neglect to say twin-turbo). There are a lot of discrepancies going on with these "reviews" and "previews".
Yeah, everyone else except Autoweek is saying air suspension is optional on the C300 and they all attended the same media events in Germany or France. But who knows - maybe Mercedes changed its mind and decided to go Airmatic standard for the initial models but the decision hasn't filtered out to everyone yet. After all, Mercedes is going 4matic standard on both cars.

Automobile Mag just published a separate review of the C400 to go along with their C250 review from earlier this week. The C400 review is critical of the combination of Airmatic and AWD. Here's the quote:

Airmatic air suspension, standard on the C400 and optional on the C300, makes the car feel more like an athlete who's arrived at training camp out of shape. It leans heavily into turns and jounces in reaction to fast lane changes. In sharp turns, it wants to plow straight past the turn-in point, although the strong brakes and grippy Continental tires prevent it from doing so. Chief engineer Christian Früh blames the all-wheel-drive componentry, which adds some 150 pounds, nearly all of it over the front axle. Then there's the mass of a 3.0-liter V-6 compared with the 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the C250.
Indeed, the C250 we drove for comparison feels like a different car. It's nimble and balanced, and it enjoys being pushed in corners....So, those who want a Mercedes sport sedan should wait for next spring, when the rear-wheel-drive C300 -- essentially a more powerful version of the C250 -- arrives at Benz's U.S. dealerships.
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...4matic-review/

Last edited by ddarko; 03-14-2014 at 12:15 AM.
Old 03-13-2014, 11:18 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by TangoRed
You have anything to back all that up? I find it hard to believe the E-class would be using an enclosed COMMAND screen when Mercedes is phasing that out in EVERYTHING else, including the upcoming GT AMG, CLS-facelift, and M-class facelift.
Current issue of Automobile magazine has a short article on the W213. The S certainly isn't losing the enclosed screens.
Old 03-14-2014, 12:08 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
djejglk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
2013 C250 sport
Originally Posted by ddarko
Yeah, I think Autoweek got their notes mixed up. Almost every other publication has explicitly said air suspension is optional on the C300 and they all attended the same media events in Germany or France as Autoweek. Odds are the 9 out of 10 journalists that are reporting Mercedes said Airmatic is standard on C400 and optional on C300 are the ones that heard it correctly.

Automobile Mag just published a separate review of the C400 to go along with their C250 review from earlier this week. The C400 review is critical of the combination of Airmatic and AWD. Here's the quote:



http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...4matic-review/
That's what I was thinking essentially. I'm really wondering what the price difference is between a RWD and a 4matic on the same model.
Old 03-14-2014, 12:30 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
ddarko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW 328i
Originally Posted by djejglk
That's what I was thinking essentially. I'm really wondering what the price difference is between a RWD and a 4matic on the same model.
Whoops, I changed my comment after you quoted it! I dunno now, maybe Mercedes will make Airmatic standard for the launch cars. They seem more keen on pushing the higher price points first in the USA than in other territories where the cheaper models are the ones launching first.

As for the price difference, the 4matic is a $2,000 option on the 2014 CLA 250 but doubt Mercedes will offer it as an option on the RWD C300 (it's not an option on the W204 C250). There's a $3,600 gap between the W204 C250 and C300 4matic. Automobile's C400 review says they expect USA prices to start around $40,000 but it's unclear from the way it's written whether they're talking about prices for the initial AWD models or if they mean even the RWD C300 will be $40,000 base.

Last edited by ddarko; 03-14-2014 at 01:03 AM.
Old 03-14-2014, 09:27 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
djejglk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
2013 C250 sport
That's the problem with scrounging for info like I do. I just get more confused
Old 03-14-2014, 08:23 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
djejglk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
2013 C250 sport
Originally Posted by ddarko
Whoops, I changed my comment after you quoted it! I dunno now, maybe Mercedes will make Airmatic standard for the launch cars. They seem more keen on pushing the higher price points first in the USA than in other territories where the cheaper models are the ones launching first.

As for the price difference, the 4matic is a $2,000 option on the 2014 CLA 250 but doubt Mercedes will offer it as an option on the RWD C300 (it's not an option on the W204 C250). There's a $3,600 gap between the W204 C250 and C300 4matic. Automobile's C400 review says they expect USA prices to start around $40,000 but it's unclear from the way it's written whether they're talking about prices for the initial AWD models or if they mean even the RWD C300 will be $40,000 base.
That's kind of the confusing part. There will only be a USA c300 at the bottom. The current c300 is a 4matic only, IIRC, so the "base" model will be available with and without 4matic (eventually). The c300 as a "replacement" of the c250 is the kicker. Current c250 is 4cyl, current c300 is 6cyl. NEW c300 is 4cyl, and 4matic or RWD, if you get my drift. The c300 will be the lowest available USA car, with subtle c250 aspects (4cyl, RWD, etc).

The fact that the c300 will start with 4matic, air suspension, etc. is a little annoying.

I want a 2015 c300, RWD, standard suspension from the get go. It seems like this configuration will be a bit of a wait.
Old 03-14-2014, 08:42 PM
  #20  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,942
Received 181 Likes on 147 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
I'm pleased with Autocar's comments. From experience they always reflect South African taste in driving moreso than others. We will have RWD from day one. About 6 weeks away.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Autoweek: 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-class First Drive



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 PM.