C Class (W205) C 180 BlueTec,C 200 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec BlueEfficiency,C 250 BlueTec,C 300 BlueTec Hybridplus,C 180,C 180 BlueEfficiency,C 200,C 250,C 300,C 400 Plug-in Hybrid,C 400

C450 First Video with Exhaust Clip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2015 | 02:20 AM
  #1  
stolenfire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
None
C450 First Video with Exhaust Clip

First video I've seen on the C450 for anyone who might be interested



Edit: Two more driving videos



Last edited by stolenfire; Feb 26, 2015 at 01:40 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2015 | 04:00 PM
  #2  
bwoodbmw's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
E90 335i
really interested to see the reviews on this car... doesn't seem to be a massive step up speed wise from the C400 but the handling is what should be much more interesting. I still wish they made it in RWD.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2015 | 06:53 PM
  #3  
stolenfire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
None
There will be a lot of first drive reviews coming out soon after the press drive in Portugal along with the C63.

Here are two that I have found so far:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t-drive-review

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...c_first_drive/
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2015 | 07:44 PM
  #4  
synaptik's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
2010 BMW X5
sounds pretty decent for what it is (better than f30 and maybe even f80) but that acceleration was kinda slow

reviews seem good so far!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2015 | 11:00 PM
  #5  
kuba.95's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 825
Likes: 15
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Mercedes-AMG C63S Edition 1
Expected a bit more from the C450 honestly. It doesn't sound all that good at all, and it's not really faster then the C400.



Last edited by kuba.95; Feb 24, 2015 at 11:45 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 12:32 AM
  #6  
stolenfire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
None
Definitely sounds decent for what it is lol. And quoted time for the car in the video is 5.0 seconds which to the C400's 5.2 is definitely not significantly faster by any means

Here's another review

http://www.digitaltrends.com/car-rev...c-first-drive/
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 01:57 AM
  #7  
dreamerak's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: PNW
CLA 250
Originally Posted by stolenfire
Definitely sounds decent for what it is lol. And quoted time for the car in the video is 5.0 seconds which to the C400's 5.2 is definitely not significantly faster by any means

Here's another review

http://www.digitaltrends.com/car-rev...c-first-drive/

The vid is of a station wagon, they weigh more, and are slower.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 07:50 AM
  #8  
stolenfire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
None
Originally Posted by dreamerak
The vid is of a station wagon, they weigh more, and are slower.
Precisely why I said 5.0 as sedan is 0.1 second faster to 60
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 12:36 PM
  #9  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 291
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
I would wait until real world testing is done to determine how fast it is. Factory estimate mean little to nothing. C&D already beat those numbers with a C400 so of course the C450 will be even faster.

M
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 08:05 PM
  #10  
Tjdehya's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 265
From: NM
2023 AMG EQS
I don't know why they didn't just name the vehicle a C400s...
Thats all it is, perhaps you guys were expecting too much because they put that AMG badge on the car?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 09:37 PM
  #11  
kuba.95's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 825
Likes: 15
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Mercedes-AMG C63S Edition 1
Originally Posted by Tjdehya
I don't know why they didn't just name the vehicle a C400s...
Thats all it is, perhaps you guys were expecting too much because they put that AMG badge on the car?
MB probably should have done what BMW did and have a power upgrade, braking upgrade etc as a option. (You can add a Performance Package 1 and Performance package 2 which add HP, torque to the car along with better brakes etc). So basically it would have been a C400 and you could add a performance package which would make the car slightly better and more competitive with other brands.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 11:34 PM
  #12  
dreamerak's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: PNW
CLA 250
Originally Posted by Germancar1
I would wait until real world testing is done to determine how fast it is. Factory estimate mean little to nothing. C&D already beat those numbers with a C400 so of course the C450 will be even faster.

M
I agree, 4.4 0-60 and a 13 flat q-mile is entirely possible once the car gets into the hands of third party testers. Funny how some people compare the factory times with magazine times, apples to kumquats comparison.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2015 | 01:41 AM
  #13  
stolenfire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
None
Two more driving videos released today
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.