C219 CLS55 and CLS63, 2004-2010

Bridgestone vs Michelin...Your thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-13-2007, 08:10 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
CLS63AMGGUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'07 CLS63 AMG, '08 S550, '09 GL450 w/appearance pkg., ('06 BMW '04 M3, '01 Boxster S - ALL SOLD)
Question Bridgestone vs Michelin...Your thoughts?

Bridgestone
Potenza RE050A - $261 Fronts / $283 Rears

vs.

Michelin Pilot
Sport PS2 - $349 Fronts / $440 Rears

Are the Bridgestone's so far less superior? Or are they worth a try?

Your thoughts?
Old 06-14-2007, 04:29 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
amalamud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 06 (K4, LSD), Range Rover Sport 06, Bentley Flying Spur 07
Potenza= better grip. PS2= better quality.
Old 06-14-2007, 04:25 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
m_berman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
06 CLS55 w/ P030, 05 Jag S Type R, 05 TBird-68 Dodge Charger R/T-440 w/4speed I'm original owner
Go to tirerack.com and do read the reviews and comparisions.
Old 06-14-2007, 05:36 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Blue_Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
215
After having both, not taking in account the price, I would say Bridgestone
Old 06-14-2007, 06:35 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Originally Posted by CLS63AMGGUY
Bridgestone
Potenza RE050A - $261 Fronts / $283 Rears

vs.

Michelin Pilot
Sport PS2 - $349 Fronts / $440 Rears

Are the Bridgestone's so far less superior? Or are they worth a try?

Your thoughts?
I have yet to see any 35 series tire stay quiet, wear evenly on a staggered set up and stay in balance after 6K miles. The W211 AMG can eat a set of tires in days. I just don't spend extra $$ for a tire that is advertised to last longer, I want fresh rubber. Do study the Tire Rack web site. Our AMG have a special rear tire, extra load factor, ask Luke as I am not sure the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A has it

My last set Kumhos $400 set (great deal) now over $540 a set, and I would try the Bridgestones in a heartbeat, they look like a good deal.
Old 06-16-2007, 01:26 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Originally Posted by CLS63AMGGUY
Bridgestone
Potenza RE050A - $261 Fronts / $283 Rears

vs.

Michelin Pilot
Sport PS2 - $349 Fronts / $440 Rears

Are the Bridgestone's so far less superior? Or are they worth a try?

Your thoughts?
im gonna try the RE01Rs next. rumor has it they are way better than the PS2s and they are only $1020 for my size
Old 06-17-2007, 09:45 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
CLS63AMGGUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'07 CLS63 AMG, '08 S550, '09 GL450 w/appearance pkg., ('06 BMW '04 M3, '01 Boxster S - ALL SOLD)
I'm going to try the Bridgestones...i'll fill everyone in on my experience.
Old 11-23-2008, 08:42 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
laman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lexus
I hate the bridgestones, my Lexus feels like a Ford now

Firestone talked me into these so called high end Bridgestones when my Michelins wore out. Boy am
I unhappy with them, and mad at myself for getting talked into these bouncy tires. The ride went from smooth as a Catellac, even with my old dried out tires as they described them, to Honda Civic bouncy. Believe me I know, my wife drives a Honda Civic bounce mobile.

We owned a Ford Exporer once, I loved it's look, but I HATED the bouncy ride. Got rid of that Explorer just before it's design flaw hit the media. Now my smooth Lexus rides lake that Explorer did. Man am I unhappy.

I may have the road performance of my old not rod, but I sure don't have the Lexus ride anymore. If you like the Michelin ride, a smooth as glass ride, DO NOT buy the Bridgestones!! When I got the Bridgestones off my other car, a Maxima, and put Michelins on it, it was handled totally different. What joy that car finally was to drive after the Michelins were put on it.

The Bridgestones are physically smaller too, so you've got to consider what that's going to look like on your vehicle. My Lexus looks a lot meeker now. Smaller is not better, just as my wife....

Last edited by laman; 11-23-2008 at 08:47 PM.
Old 11-24-2008, 11:24 AM
  #9  
Almost a Member!
 
NJBoy115's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CLS55 AMG President Edition
I have Bridgestone's on my CLS55 President Edition and they run fine!
Old 11-27-2008, 04:11 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
pungburb1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles::Taipei::Sydney::
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG, FX45, GS300, Acura TL, Galant, Diamante,
None of those...i'd go Conti Sports for sure...harder tires...less chance of bending your wheel...and crazy performance
Old 11-27-2008, 07:07 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
platinumsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 Lexus GS300, 2007 Lexus GS350
After being a Michelin man for most of my life, I wanted to try something cheaper. Ratings on Tirerack for the Bridgestone RE960's were exxcellent so I gave it a try. No, this isn't the Bridgestone model mentioned in the thread but I still wanted to give my opinion.
The Bridgestone doesn't come close to matching the PS2 but for the money, I can't complain. Not super quiet but more quiet than most. Not super sticky and if I did have a complaint that would be it. I feel very confident in the rain and after 10K miles they still look brand new so they last a while.
I've tried other brands throughout the years but I always go back to Michelin and I will again. They are simply the best tire in the world.
Old 11-29-2008, 03:50 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
CalabasasMBZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 ML350W4
Both are great tires, but if money were no object I'd get the PS2's. For the difference in price I'd get the RE050's, they are OEM and definetly the better value!
Old 11-29-2008, 10:29 AM
  #13  
Member
 
SSSSE YA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Simi Valley CA
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 CLS 63 030 package 2011 C63 1997 Dodge Viper GTS
The PS2 is a far superior tire for traction hands down.
Old 11-30-2008, 10:54 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
hatem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: cairo, egypt
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cls 55 amg, clk 320
You should also consider the pirelli p zero's, my car came with them, and i cannot say that ive had any significant issues with them, bear in mind that the roads in Egypt are among the worst on the planet. So overall it is safe to say that they will withstand lots of tormenting.
Old 12-01-2008, 03:25 PM
  #15  
Newbie
 
laman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lexus
followup on my 1st report on Bridgestones

We just got back from a trip to the east coast, from Texas. My gas mileage is DOWN 4.5mpg with these new Bridgestones. I couldn't believe that number when I first noticed it, but the Lexus computer and gas bill both match this disappointing performance.

There's is a lot more tread meeting the road with the pattern on these Bridgstones. Doesn't that translate into more resistance, more heat, and less mileage?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Bridgestone vs Michelin...Your thoughts?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.