DYNO result Evotech, Powerchip, VRP530
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
DYNO result Evotech, Powerchip, VRP530
This result is spread out but all were done on dynojet.
1. stock May 2007
2. Powerchip ECU June 2007
3. Evotech ECU Feb 2008(This also includes the VRP 530)
4. Run through the gears, with Evotech and Vrp 530
The first tune (powerchip) produced better Throttle response and felt better over stock, 1/4 mile times suffered and I had the ECU re-tuned and my times improved a little. (powerchip)
In November 2007 I sent my ECU to ADAM at EE. Oliver retuned the ECU , a dyno was not used. There was a small improvement in Trap in the 1/8th and 1/4 mile.
The VRP 530 package plus Evotech tune are #3 and 4
Please check the latest dyno results and let me know if the A/F is unsafe, car was on 93 octane. Let me know if anybody has had any problems with the Evotech ECU tun
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. stock May 2007
2. Powerchip ECU June 2007
3. Evotech ECU Feb 2008(This also includes the VRP 530)
4. Run through the gears, with Evotech and Vrp 530
The first tune (powerchip) produced better Throttle response and felt better over stock, 1/4 mile times suffered and I had the ECU re-tuned and my times improved a little. (powerchip)
In November 2007 I sent my ECU to ADAM at EE. Oliver retuned the ECU , a dyno was not used. There was a small improvement in Trap in the 1/8th and 1/4 mile.
The VRP 530 package plus Evotech tune are #3 and 4
Please check the latest dyno results and let me know if the A/F is unsafe, car was on 93 octane. Let me know if anybody has had any problems with the Evotech ECU tun
1.
2.
3.
4.
Last edited by juicee63; 02-06-2008 at 05:50 PM.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
LOL..kinda , yeah but hit 430-440 on the other 4th gear only pulls. That run was to 182 mph and it had easy 200 but the dyno stops at 180.. The inertia allowed the power output as the wheels were already spinning so yeah it did hit that # but he said the 440 was really what she was making through the gear.
I did not cool her and she pulled 430-440 3 times, add 2% for the old model dynojet(according to op) his dyno is lower than newer models.. Car definately has no limiter
438-449 seems to be what he thought the range on a new dynojet would be.
Anybody in LA needing a Dyno DC Performance is tremendous value, 75.00 This is nextto 110 motoring, which I drove by, sorry guys for not stopping , great looking 63 sitting in front.
I did not cool her and she pulled 430-440 3 times, add 2% for the old model dynojet(according to op) his dyno is lower than newer models.. Car definately has no limiter
438-449 seems to be what he thought the range on a new dynojet would be.
Anybody in LA needing a Dyno DC Performance is tremendous value, 75.00 This is nextto 110 motoring, which I drove by, sorry guys for not stopping , great looking 63 sitting in front.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
funny she shifted out to 7th gear at 173 mph!! I definately make it to 200 if the dyno could take it. Just as I suspected from 90-130 the 63 is amazing then it shifts out, 4th gear definately=most power
490 at the wheels LOL!!! How the heck did that happen?
Last edited by juicee63; 02-06-2008 at 05:52 PM.
#7
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fast cars in general....
great man, looks like the 530 package is as advertised.
funny she shifted out to 7th gear at 173 mph!! I definately make it to 200 if the dyno could take it. Just as I suspected from 90-130 the 63 is amazing then it shifts out, 4th gear definately=most power
490 at the wheels LOL!!! How the heck did that happen?
funny she shifted out to 7th gear at 173 mph!! I definately make it to 200 if the dyno could take it. Just as I suspected from 90-130 the 63 is amazing then it shifts out, 4th gear definately=most power
490 at the wheels LOL!!! How the heck did that happen?
Last edited by gripforce-cl65; 02-06-2008 at 07:40 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
440whp, that's one strong CLS63 with just about perfect AFR. I too got the ECU/TCU upgrade from Evotech and I'm little concerned about the tuning I got because all that drama going on with Evotech tuning. I've scheduled my dyno run on Fri. and I hope mine comes out as satisfying as yours. And yes, DC performance is a great place and they are very well known in viper nation . Dan and Lyle always take good care of my viper.
THAY ARE AWESOME!!! I really got alot of tips from LYLE!! Those vipers were SIK
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
sorry to burst the bubble it's called a rwhp spike..... surprised they didn't explain this simple fact to you juicee63 Your car didn't really make 489rwhp
It' s a glitch...Happens all the time.. Infact that entire last run is full of spikes, it should be like the rest of them, more flat..
It' s a glitch...Happens all the time.. Infact that entire last run is full of spikes, it should be like the rest of them, more flat..
Last edited by Thericker; 02-07-2008 at 12:35 AM.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
sorry to burst the bubble it's called a rwhp spike..... surprised they didn't explain this simple fact to you juicee63 Your car didn't really make 489rwhp
It' s a glitch...Happens all the time.. Infact that entire last run is full of spikes, it should be like the rest of them, more flat..
It' s a glitch...Happens all the time.. Infact that entire last run is full of spikes, it should be like the rest of them, more flat..
The spikes are shift points as we ran to 7th hitting 182 mph
I will ask Chris to explain the "spike" to 489. He stated the car made it but it was due to the inertia produced from "running through the gears".
The spikes in the run are from shifting , the power produced was not a glitch , however spikes are not really a true indicator of usable peak hp as you see in the graph what goes up comes down. The car sweet spot is 90-135. and shifting 6800-7100. In previous dyno runs I think operators stopped short of peak, car must redline IMO.
Last edited by juicee63; 02-07-2008 at 02:26 AM.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Chris explained it a little differently
The spikes are shift points as we ran to 7th hitting 182 mph
I will ask Chris to explain the "spike" to 489. He stated the car made it but it was due to the inertia produced from "running through the gears".
The spikes in the run are from shifting , the power produced was not a glitch , however spikes are not really a true indicator of usable peak hp as you see in the graph what goes up comes down. The car sweet spot is 90-135. and shifting 6800-7100. In prvieous dyno runs I think operators stopped short of peak, car must redline IMO.
The spikes are shift points as we ran to 7th hitting 182 mph
I will ask Chris to explain the "spike" to 489. He stated the car made it but it was due to the inertia produced from "running through the gears".
The spikes in the run are from shifting , the power produced was not a glitch , however spikes are not really a true indicator of usable peak hp as you see in the graph what goes up comes down. The car sweet spot is 90-135. and shifting 6800-7100. In prvieous dyno runs I think operators stopped short of peak, car must redline IMO.
Or do you actually believe an ECU tune on N/A 93 octane can garner, 83+ RWHP & 108 RWTO gainsNot unless you're using Turbos or nos
That U would get w/600/65 motors, Think logically, the other (3) Dynos show your aerage being muh lower, but thi 1 3rd i totally higher w/notable pikes...
Erveryone knows a good eu tune is worth @ bet 15-20 rwhp & rwto on N/A vehile
& please lets run my C6 410rwp 397 rwto on the frwy (advantage to you) & you should take me up on that?? my lower weight shouldnt matter at frwy speeds, are you down bro? Halfway? Laters
No hard feeling, just trying to get this straight.
Last edited by Thericker; 02-07-2008 at 04:40 AM.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
The car went from 408 to 440 and there is alot of room in the tune.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Sorry bro, they are Dyno Spikes... I've seen them hundereds of times... Your other runs w/flatter curves are your TRUE RWHP & RWTO that last run is all messed up...
Or do you actually believe an ECU tune on N/A 93 octane can garner, 83+ RWHP & 108 RWTO gainsNot unless you're using Turbos or nos
That U would get w/600/65 motors, Think logically, the other (3) Dynos show your aerage being muh lower, but thi 1 3rd i totally higher w/notable pikes...
Erveryone knows a good eu tune is worth @ bet 15-20 rwhp & rwto on N/A vehile
& please lets run my C6 410rwp 397 rwto on the frwy (advantage to you) & you should take me up on that?? my lower weight shouldnt matter at frwy speeds, are you down bro? Halfway? Laters
No hard feeling, just trying to get this straight.
Or do you actually believe an ECU tune on N/A 93 octane can garner, 83+ RWHP & 108 RWTO gainsNot unless you're using Turbos or nos
That U would get w/600/65 motors, Think logically, the other (3) Dynos show your aerage being muh lower, but thi 1 3rd i totally higher w/notable pikes...
Erveryone knows a good eu tune is worth @ bet 15-20 rwhp & rwto on N/A vehile
& please lets run my C6 410rwp 397 rwto on the frwy (advantage to you) & you should take me up on that?? my lower weight shouldnt matter at frwy speeds, are you down bro? Halfway? Laters
No hard feeling, just trying to get this straight.
No biggie bro. Where the heck have you been????
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
I agree the spike is not a true peak reading but I want you to understand it is an actual reading not a glitch. The engine according to DC Performance made 489 but thety also told me not to use it because it was aided by the inertia of gear changes.
No biggie bro. Where the heck have you been????
No biggie bro. Where the heck have you been????
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I was just happy to see a gain since my last dyno after the power chip netted 1 hp. There are alot of weird thing on the dyno that cannot be applied to the real world, no drag, no air flow, no friction..I was doing one eighty in 10 seconds LOL
#22
Awesome dyno! Thats great Juicee!
Hey guys, I just picked up a 2007 CLS63 AMG and I also want to do some modding. Do you think the evo ECU tune is the best? What mods can I do to get the best bang for my buck? The car is supposed to have 507 hp, but at the wheels much less. I have heard that some people are making 470/480hp at the wheels with an ecu, headers, exhaust,pulley- but not sure how to go about this without spending a fortune. I am also told they don't make supercharger/turbo for the 6.3 amg. What other mods can be done? Anybody have experience? Thanks in advance. Want to make my car as fast as can be, since this is going to be the fastest car I own out the gate.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Sorry bro, they are Dyno Spikes... I've seen them hundereds of times... Your other runs w/flatter curves are your TRUE RWHP & RWTO that last run is all messed up...
Or do you actually believe an ECU tune on N/A 93 octane can garner, 83+ RWHP & 108 RWTO gainsNot unless you're using Turbos or nos
That U would get w/600/65 motors, Think logically, the other (3) Dynos show your aerage being muh lower, but thi 1 3rd i totally higher w/notable pikes...
Erveryone knows a good eu tune is worth @ bet 15-20 rwhp & rwto on N/A vehile
& please lets run my C6 410rwp 397 rwto on the frwy (advantage to you) & you should take me up on that?? my lower weight shouldnt matter at frwy speeds, are you down bro? Halfway? Laters
No hard feeling, just trying to get this straight.
Or do you actually believe an ECU tune on N/A 93 octane can garner, 83+ RWHP & 108 RWTO gainsNot unless you're using Turbos or nos
That U would get w/600/65 motors, Think logically, the other (3) Dynos show your aerage being muh lower, but thi 1 3rd i totally higher w/notable pikes...
Erveryone knows a good eu tune is worth @ bet 15-20 rwhp & rwto on N/A vehile
& please lets run my C6 410rwp 397 rwto on the frwy (advantage to you) & you should take me up on that?? my lower weight shouldnt matter at frwy speeds, are you down bro? Halfway? Laters
No hard feeling, just trying to get this straight.
We tend to get caught up with big numbers these days and even amongst friends and forums the term 500whp seems like such a common number thrown out..when most guys have no clue how much power that truly is and how much money it takes to build that (most guys could not control a 120hp stock 1990 Miata around a track either..LOL).
Either way good post Ricker and good dyno pulls Juice. Good read.
Yasin
#24
Registered User
Hey guys, I just picked up a 2007 CLS63 AMG and I also want to do some modding. Do you think the evo ECU tune is the best? What mods can I do to get the best bang for my buck? The car is supposed to have 507 hp, but at the wheels much less. I have heard that some people are making 470/480hp at the wheels with an ecu, headers, exhaust,pulley- but not sure how to go about this without spending a fortune. I am also told they don't make supercharger/turbo for the 6.3 amg. What other mods can be done? Anybody have experience? Thanks in advance. Want to make my car as fast as can be, since this is going to be the fastest car I own out the gate.
#25
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 CLS 55 2007 M6 Vert, 2008 S550
Hey Guys....Nice numbers on the 63....I have had this print out sitting in my drawer for a while, but I guess my CLS55 is kind of a beast with the numbers I have. I did a Renntech Pulley and ECU and that is it.... I never really looked at some of the CLS numbers because I was just happy with my car, but now I think I am PRETTY DARN HAPPY. Sorry for the small attachment....first time I tried to upload anything.
Last edited by BurnR8; 06-21-2010 at 12:37 PM. Reason: mistake