How fast is CLS55 AMG stock !!!
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
How fast is CLS55 AMG stock !!!
im new here and i just have little question to ask ...
how fast is stock CLS55 amg from 0-200km /h !!!
my CTS-V goes from 0-200 km/h in 12.4 second which is good and fast enough
look at this video ( my car ) doing from 0-210 km/h
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee9bvMWmuwI
but can stock cls 55 can goes faster than this number !!!
i have friend of mine who just bought used CLS55 AMG
and i raced him twice , rolling and from 0-230
look at the clips
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On2cjq5eQQ0
and standing from 0-230
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYGtfKHp6pQ
honestly ... he is saying his car is stock !!! i cant believe him
what do you think ?? i think for CLs to goe that fast it must be tuned !!!
By the way i joing AMG club soon with the new E63
how fast is stock CLS55 amg from 0-200km /h !!!
my CTS-V goes from 0-200 km/h in 12.4 second which is good and fast enough
look at this video ( my car ) doing from 0-210 km/h
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee9bvMWmuwI
but can stock cls 55 can goes faster than this number !!!
i have friend of mine who just bought used CLS55 AMG
and i raced him twice , rolling and from 0-230
look at the clips
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On2cjq5eQQ0
and standing from 0-230
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYGtfKHp6pQ
honestly ... he is saying his car is stock !!! i cant believe him
what do you think ?? i think for CLs to goe that fast it must be tuned !!!
By the way i joing AMG club soon with the new E63
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
SL63
im new here and i just have little question to ask ...
how fast is stock CLS55 amg from 0-200km /h !!!
my CTS-V goes from 0-200 km/h in 12.4 second which is good and fast enought but can stock cls 55 can goes faster than this number !!!
I joing AMG club soon with the new E63
how fast is stock CLS55 amg from 0-200km /h !!!
my CTS-V goes from 0-200 km/h in 12.4 second which is good and fast enought but can stock cls 55 can goes faster than this number !!!
I joing AMG club soon with the new E63
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s_pricing.html
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t/specs_page_2
2005 Cadillac CTS-V / 0-60 = 4.8 - 1/4 = 13.2 seconds (Car&Driver)
2003 M.Benz E55 / 0-60 = 4.2 - 1/4 = 12.39 seconds (R&T Online)
http://www.exoticcarsite.com/0-60-qu...mile-times.htm
13.3 for 1/4 mile
http://forums.roadfly.com/forums/cad...4951389-8.html
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
I looked around and only found 13.2 to 13.6 for your CTS-V ?
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s_pricing.html
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t/specs_page_2
2005 Cadillac CTS-V / 0-60 = 4.8 - 1/4 = 13.2 seconds (Car&Driver)
2003 M.Benz E55 / 0-60 = 4.2 - 1/4 = 12.39 seconds (R&T Online)
http://www.exoticcarsite.com/0-60-qu...mile-times.htm
13.3 for 1/4 mile
http://forums.roadfly.com/forums/cad...4951389-8.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s_pricing.html
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t/specs_page_2
2005 Cadillac CTS-V / 0-60 = 4.8 - 1/4 = 13.2 seconds (Car&Driver)
2003 M.Benz E55 / 0-60 = 4.2 - 1/4 = 12.39 seconds (R&T Online)
http://www.exoticcarsite.com/0-60-qu...mile-times.htm
13.3 for 1/4 mile
http://forums.roadfly.com/forums/cad...4951389-8.html
the one i have has 556 HP 6.2 supercharged
which is the fastest 4 door sedean
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
Zero to 60 mph: 3.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 8.7 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 14.8 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.1 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.2 sec @ 119 mph
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Illinois Northern Lake County
2016 SL550 Mille Miglia 417
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Rx-7, CLS 63
Yes, the car in the video was wearing CLS 63 badges, not a CLS 55 Compressor badges.
That being said, you have presented us with times of a quarter mile type (0-200kmh) race to justify your argument, but the race you ran seems to be faster and longer. At speeds above 200kmh, is where the breathing of the 32 valve motor of the 63 coupled with the close ratio 7 speed start to shine.
A race from 0 to 200kmh between all three cars would likely be won by driver differences and traction off the line. But, after 200kmh, the horsepower curve from 5000-7000, rear axle gear ratio, transmission gear ratios of gears 5-6-7, and aero dynamics of the vehicle would most likely make the decision.
If your car is the automatic transmission model, your car will be faster to 200kmh than a manual model because of being able to keep the boost up between shifts. However, the manual trans model will put more horsepower to the ground which will aid in top speed runs. I believe in one of the posted articles you can see the top speed difference between the auto and the manual trans. Also note that top speed for the auto is achieved in 5th gear not 6th gear. From my past experience, the manual will also be in 5th gear for top speed achievement, since 6th gear is usually .5 :1 which is way too tall to be useful with only 550 hp.
Finally, I hate to disappoint you, but your "new E63" will not kill your friend's CLS 63, since they are virtually the same car. However, you will will be able to do some true racing between yourselves and see who is the better driver, instead of who has the more powerful car.
That being said, you have presented us with times of a quarter mile type (0-200kmh) race to justify your argument, but the race you ran seems to be faster and longer. At speeds above 200kmh, is where the breathing of the 32 valve motor of the 63 coupled with the close ratio 7 speed start to shine.
A race from 0 to 200kmh between all three cars would likely be won by driver differences and traction off the line. But, after 200kmh, the horsepower curve from 5000-7000, rear axle gear ratio, transmission gear ratios of gears 5-6-7, and aero dynamics of the vehicle would most likely make the decision.
If your car is the automatic transmission model, your car will be faster to 200kmh than a manual model because of being able to keep the boost up between shifts. However, the manual trans model will put more horsepower to the ground which will aid in top speed runs. I believe in one of the posted articles you can see the top speed difference between the auto and the manual trans. Also note that top speed for the auto is achieved in 5th gear not 6th gear. From my past experience, the manual will also be in 5th gear for top speed achievement, since 6th gear is usually .5 :1 which is way too tall to be useful with only 550 hp.
Finally, I hate to disappoint you, but your "new E63" will not kill your friend's CLS 63, since they are virtually the same car. However, you will will be able to do some true racing between yourselves and see who is the better driver, instead of who has the more powerful car.
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
09 cls63amg,05 nissan armada,03 mits evo viii,06 ninja636
cls 63 is not a joke!!! i raced a 2006 nissan 350z twin turbo 478rwhp, and went from a 5mph roll and killed him till i hit my govenor and was riding my govenor for like 15sec until he passed me. i never drove the 09 cts-v but i guess amg's 6.2 n/a motor is better than chevys zr1 6.2 supercharged. i just cant get over amg making monster power out of 6.2 v8, and 7.0 z06 is only 505. thats crazy!!!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
cls 63 is not a joke!!! i raced a 2006 nissan 350z twin turbo 478rwhp, and went from a 5mph roll and killed him till i hit my govenor and was riding my govenor for like 15sec until he passed me. i never drove the 09 cts-v but i guess amg's 6.2 n/a motor is better than chevys zr1 6.2 supercharged. i just cant get over amg making monster power out of 6.2 v8, and 7.0 z06 is only 505. thats crazy!!!
you're saying that your car, which puts down LESS wheel horsepower than 478rwhp and weighs 4200lbs, beat a Z that puts down more power than you and weighs 3200 lbs?
1000 lb difference, and no way your car dynos 478whp in its stock form.
Or are you not stock? Or are you perhaps confusing wheel horsepower with crank horsepower? Or perhaps the guy wasnt racing you
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
09 cls63amg,05 nissan armada,03 mits evo viii,06 ninja636
hate to jump in here, but i must be missing something.
you're saying that your car, which puts down LESS wheel horsepower than 478rwhp and weighs 4200lbs, beat a Z that puts down more power than you and weighs 3200 lbs?
1000 lb difference, and no way your car dynos 478whp in its stock form.
Or are you not stock? Or are you perhaps confusing wheel horsepower with crank horsepower? Or perhaps the guy wasnt racing you
you're saying that your car, which puts down LESS wheel horsepower than 478rwhp and weighs 4200lbs, beat a Z that puts down more power than you and weighs 3200 lbs?
1000 lb difference, and no way your car dynos 478whp in its stock form.
Or are you not stock? Or are you perhaps confusing wheel horsepower with crank horsepower? Or perhaps the guy wasnt racing you
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
wheel spin my man, wheel spin!! my car was made for the power and the 350z is not made for that power. the z has 478whp. plus you out shift the auomatic. he was playing catch-up the whole time. from a roll without break-boosting would be close, probally would get me by 4-5 cars.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
sorry .. but we just found that the CLS55 AMG i raced not cls63 ( he is putting 6.3 but the engine is 5.4 supercharged ) ... is modded ... ECU + sport filters + increasing the boost of the supercharged ) ... now im happy i tried against CLS63 last night and i gave him 5 car length from 0-230 and i was able to give him more ... i will post the video soon ... also i will race sl55 soon ... i know that cts-v faster than any 4 door sedean in the market ..
Last edited by cts-v2009; Aug 16, 2009 at 05:51 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
sorry .. but we just found that the CLS55 AMG i raced not cls63 ( he is putting 6.3 but the engine is 5.4 supercharged ) ... is modded ... ECU + sport filters + increasing the boost of the supercharged ) ... now im happy i tried against CLS63 last night and i gave him 5 car length from 0-230 and i was able to give him more ... i will post the video soon ... also i will race sl55 soon ... i know that cts-v faster than any 4 door sedean in the market ..
race an S65 or S600. You will get WALKED.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
i raced CLS63 brabus when my CTS-V was new (like 1000km on the clock ) ... he couldnt pass me like this CLS55 ...
Anyway i will bring for him CTs-V with ECU tune .. ansd i will see if he can stand a chane !!!
Anyway i will bring for him CTs-V with ECU tune .. ansd i will see if he can stand a chane !!!
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
it seems that most guys on car forums with modifiable cars modify them. that isnt an "AMG guy" thing. i can go over onto LS1tech or GM forums with your motor on it and tell you the exact same thing.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
But lim happy with my E63 .. i will buy because how it looks ... and because of the name of MB ... if i put little tune on it ... i will just overload the engine with extra hp ...
i love cars with stock engine ,,, and i will love my E63 although my CTS-V is faster ,, but in the END E63 is more enjoyable to drive than CTS-V ... and love the hertiage of MB
i love cars with stock engine ,,, and i will love my E63 although my CTS-V is faster ,, but in the END E63 is more enjoyable to drive than CTS-V ... and love the hertiage of MB
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
09 cls63amg,05 nissan armada,03 mits evo viii,06 ninja636
why would someone put 6.3 on a cls55 amg?? sounds scetchy?? thats like the sl65 and taking the v-12 off and put v-8!! no? maby it was a cls 550 with amg badges? haha!! but you still have a nice car though!!
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
but as i ve heard CLS55 AMG faster than CLS63 AMG
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa.
09 cls63amg,05 nissan armada,03 mits evo viii,06 ninja636
but as i ve heard CLS55 AMG faster than CLS63 AMG [/quote]
oky doky! why dont you flash your cts-v? look at this sh*t right here!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfwBDjDjCV0
[/quote]oky doky! why dont you flash your cts-v? look at this sh*t right here!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfwBDjDjCV0
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
CLS55 AMG
Who mods cars...
