cts-v2009

im new here and i just have little question to ask ...

how fast is stock CLS55 amg from 0-200km /h !!!

my CTS-V goes from 0-200 km/h in 12.4 second which is good and fast enough

look at this video ( my car ) doing from 0-210 km/h
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee9bvMWmuwI


but can stock cls 55 can goes faster than this number !!!

i have friend of mine who just bought used CLS55 AMG

and i raced him twice , rolling and from 0-230

look at the clips

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On2cjq5eQQ0

and standing from 0-230

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYGtfKHp6pQ


honestly ... he is saying his car is stock !!! i cant believe him

what do you think ?? i think for CLs to goe that fast it must be tuned !!!

By the way i joing AMG club soon with the new E63

trboda6

its stock bro you got OWNED! change the tittle on the videos to STOCK cls NOT modded.. and sell the us machine and jump on over to the other side..

turbotom1

I looked around and only found 13.2 to 13.6 for your CTS-V ?


http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s_pricing.html

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t/specs_page_2

2005 Cadillac CTS-V / 0-60 = 4.8 - 1/4 = 13.2 seconds (Car&Driver)
2003 M.Benz E55 / 0-60 = 4.2 - 1/4 = 12.39 seconds (R&T Online)
http://www.exoticcarsite.com/0-60-qu...mile-times.htm
13.3 for 1/4 mile
http://forums.roadfly.com/forums/cad...4951389-8.html

cts-v2009

hi my bro

the one i have has 556 HP 6.2 supercharged

which is the fastest 4 door sedean

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test

Zero to 60 mph: 3.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 8.7 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 14.8 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.1 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.2 sec @ 119 mph

cts-v2009

no not owned by modded car ... stock vs stock i will kill him .. my E63 will kill him too

trboda6

VTen555

http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-13798.html

cts-v2009

THanks VTEN55 for posting the links ... but do you think will pass me like im standing !!!!

to do so .... he must passing querter mile in less than 11.7 !!!

ssonss1

doesn't the cls in the video have the 6.3 badge on the side?

Trirotor

Yes, the car in the video was wearing CLS 63 badges, not a CLS 55 Compressor badges.

That being said, you have presented us with times of a quarter mile type (0-200kmh) race to justify your argument, but the race you ran seems to be faster and longer. At speeds above 200kmh, is where the breathing of the 32 valve motor of the 63 coupled with the close ratio 7 speed start to shine.

A race from 0 to 200kmh between all three cars would likely be won by driver differences and traction off the line. But, after 200kmh, the horsepower curve from 5000-7000, rear axle gear ratio, transmission gear ratios of gears 5-6-7, and aero dynamics of the vehicle would most likely make the decision.

If your car is the automatic transmission model, your car will be faster to 200kmh than a manual model because of being able to keep the boost up between shifts. However, the manual trans model will put more horsepower to the ground which will aid in top speed runs. I believe in one of the posted articles you can see the top speed difference between the auto and the manual trans. Also note that top speed for the auto is achieved in 5th gear not 6th gear. From my past experience, the manual will also be in 5th gear for top speed achievement, since 6th gear is usually .5 :1 which is way too tall to be useful with only 550 hp.

Finally, I hate to disappoint you, but your "new E63" will not kill your friend's CLS 63, since they are virtually the same car. However, you will will be able to do some true racing between yourselves and see who is the better driver, instead of who has the more powerful car.

pizzamancls63

cls 63 is not a joke!!! i raced a 2006 nissan 350z twin turbo 478rwhp, and went from a 5mph roll and killed him till i hit my govenor and was riding my govenor for like 15sec until he passed me. i never drove the 09 cts-v but i guess amg's 6.2 n/a motor is better than chevys zr1 6.2 supercharged. i just cant get over amg making monster power out of 6.2 v8, and 7.0 z06 is only 505. thats crazy!!!

jturkel

hate to jump in here, but i must be missing something.

you're saying that your car, which puts down LESS wheel horsepower than 478rwhp and weighs 4200lbs, beat a Z that puts down more power than you and weighs 3200 lbs?
1000 lb difference, and no way your car dynos 478whp in its stock form.

Or are you not stock? Or are you perhaps confusing wheel horsepower with crank horsepower? Or perhaps the guy wasnt racing you

pizzamancls63

wheel spin my man, wheel spin!! my car was made for the power and the 350z is not made for that power. the z has 478whp. plus you out shift the auomatic. he was playing catch-up the whole time. from a roll without break-boosting would be close, probally would get me by 4-5 cars.

jturkel

ahh ok. cool cool. thanks for the clarification

cts-v2009

sorry .. but we just found that the CLS55 AMG i raced not cls63 ( he is putting 6.3 but the engine is 5.4 supercharged ) ... is modded ... ECU + sport filters + increasing the boost of the supercharged ) ... now im happy i tried against CLS63 last night and i gave him 5 car length from 0-230 and i was able to give him more ... i will post the video soon ... also i will race sl55 soon ... i know that cts-v faster than any 4 door sedean in the market ..

jturkel

lol. not true.

race an S65 or S600. You will get WALKED.

cts-v2009

i raced CLS63 brabus when my CTS-V was new (like 1000km on the clock ) ... he couldnt pass me like this CLS55 ...

Anyway i will bring for him CTs-V with ECU tune .. ansd i will see if he can stand a chane !!!

cts-v2009

S600 is not fast ... my old jaguar XFSV8 with little tune was faster

S65 .. im looking for this race ... but stock please !!!

it seems most AMG guys they are not happy with stocks engine !!!

jturkel

it seems that most guys on car forums with modifiable cars modify them. that isnt an "AMG guy" thing. i can go over onto LS1tech or GM forums with your motor on it and tell you the exact same thing.

cts-v2009

But lim happy with my E63 .. i will buy because how it looks ... and because of the name of MB ... if i put little tune on it ... i will just overload the engine with extra hp ...

i love cars with stock engine ,,, and i will love my E63 although my CTS-V is faster ,, but in the END E63 is more enjoyable to drive than CTS-V ... and love the hertiage of MB

pizzamancls63

why would someone put 6.3 on a cls55 amg?? sounds scetchy?? thats like the sl65 and taking the v-12 off and put v-8!! no? maby it was a cls 550 with amg badges? haha!! but you still have a nice car though!!

cts-v2009

to show that hiscar is 2009 not 2006 ...

but as i ve heard CLS55 AMG faster than CLS63 AMG

pizzamancls63

but as i ve heard CLS55 AMG faster than CLS63 AMG [/quote]
oky doky! why dont you flash your cts-v? look at this sh*t right here!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfwBDjDjCV0

ThePatriot

2nd that one--I run two Vettes, a cls55, and a Hayabusa, love the forums and no matter how hard I try I just have to one-up the stock configurations. The only thing that would make these rides more fun is if I could jump one of them off the back of a C130.

RRnelcheeze

your CTS-V is faster than the Rocket? I thought the Brabus Rocket held the record for fastest 4 door?

516mbtek

CTS-V = supercharged. E63 Naturally aspriated. MB sees superchargers as OLD news...quit using went NA and now turbo. Caddi still trying to catch up lol