C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

two quick contests, nrx and honda 200

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-13-2005, 08:20 PM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
slobote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: fort myers,florida
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c32amg
two quick contests, nrx and honda 200

Both started before I even knew that it was a race. They both jumped me with high RPMS and I hung on even until they shut down. On both of them I had W instead of sport. I may never have this chance again, so tell me how fast are these two cars?
Old 05-13-2005, 10:05 PM
  #2  
Member
 
KL316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: LA, California
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
03 silver C32 AMG
Originally Posted by slobote
Both started before I even knew that it was a race. They both jumped me with high RPMS and I hung on even until they shut down. On both of them I had W instead of sport. I may never have this chance again, so tell me how fast are these two cars?

what the hell is a NRX and a Honda 200?
Old 05-13-2005, 10:07 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
ronnie0738's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norcal
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 Nissan 350Z
i think you are referring to a NSX and S2000? damn dude least have an idea what you ran.
Old 05-13-2005, 10:52 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dragonAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sin City
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
12' C63 P31, 06' Supercharged Range, 08' BMW 550i
Originally Posted by slobote
Both started before I even knew that it was a race. They both jumped me with high RPMS and I hung on even until they shut down. On both of them I had W instead of sport. I may never have this chance again, so tell me how fast are these two cars?
To be honest, both those cars are pretty slow. Mid to high 14 second cars.
Old 05-13-2005, 11:09 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
ronnie0738's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norcal
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 Nissan 350Z
Originally Posted by dragonAMG
To be honest, both those cars are pretty slow. Mid to high 14 second cars.
you guys under-estimate these cars. NSX (3.2L V6) runs mid 13sec and the s2000 runs low 14s stock.
Old 05-13-2005, 11:20 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dragonAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sin City
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
12' C63 P31, 06' Supercharged Range, 08' BMW 550i
Originally Posted by ronnie0738
you guys under-estimate these cars. NSX (3.2L V6) runs mid 13sec and the s2000 runs low 14s stock.
Maybe the new NSX's do, but the old ones put up 14.5 all day long. And, the s2000's post high 14's. I'm in Vegas at 2,200 ft. above sea level.

I used to have a civic w/ GSR motor running a T3/T4 @ 12 lbs laying down 13.2 and my buddy had a stock s2000 laying down high 14's.

Last edited by dragonAMG; 05-13-2005 at 11:30 PM.
Old 05-13-2005, 11:25 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
ronnie0738's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norcal
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 Nissan 350Z
at your elevation, sure but not adjusted to sea level.

Trending Topics

Old 05-14-2005, 12:51 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2002 C32 Black/Charcoal
I have raced one (older) NSX and two S2000s in my modded C32. The NSX was on the freeway, and it was not even close (I killed him). I think that I could probably still beat the new NSX, but it would be close.

The S2000, with a good driver, can give you a good run for a short sprint if you are not in the C32 powerband when the race starts, such as if you start the race from 30 MPH (bottom end of 2nd gear) or 60 MPH (bottom end of 3rd gear). However, with equal drivers from a stop, the C32 will whomp the 2000. I beat a 2000 in the 1/4 mile by 15 car lengths or so. A modded S2000 is a different story (especially a supercharged one).
Old 05-15-2005, 12:40 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cntlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
SL55 will beat NSX for sure
S2000
Old 05-15-2005, 03:43 AM
  #10  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
BlackC230Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 12,403
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Fast Cars!
Originally Posted by cntlaw
SL55 will beat NSX for sure
S2000

whos talking about a SL55?


btw, i have seen a stock S2000 run high 13s.
Old 05-15-2005, 07:52 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cntlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
Originally Posted by BlackC230Coupe
whos talking about a SL55?


btw, i have seen a stock S2000 run high 13s.

you were right - I must not know what I was reading,
"SLK88 faster than my dog"

that's why ....... :p
Old 05-17-2005, 06:16 PM
  #12  
Member
 
AgentQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C55 AMG (Capri Blue)
New C55 owner, almost ex-NSX owner replies...

Originally Posted by dragonAMG
Maybe the new NSX's do, but the old ones put up 14.5 all day long. And, the s2000's post high 14's. I'm in Vegas at 2,200 ft. above sea level.

I used to have a civic w/ GSR motor running a T3/T4 @ 12 lbs laying down 13.2 and my buddy had a stock s2000 laying down high 14's.
Well, as I'm about to sell my NSX (just bought my C55), I have a say on this one. I ran a 13.9@101 at Moroso on a very good night. Nice cool weather and low humidity (in the fall last year). My C55 is SOOO much faster, I can't even begin to explain. My car dyno'd at 240rwhp, and that is a very strong number for a 3.0L NSX. I have a feeling my C55 will probably dyno quite a bit higher. The reason I sold my NSX?

1. Too few seats
2. Too little torque

The handling on the NSX is freaking sublime though. I installed the NSX-R shocks/springs and upgraded the brakes and clutch as well. It's a great handling car, but the $10,000 comptech supercharger still wouldn't bring the car up to C55 levels of acceleration. For that I'd need to go with a high boost kit (injectors/pulleys), a fuel management system (that would require me to switch from OBDII(really 1.5 on the '95) to OBDI, forged pistons, headers, exhaust, etc... All that would have left a gaping hole to the tune of around $35k (including labor) in my wallet and what would I have? 400rwhp & 320ft. lb. That's a hell of a lot of work for not a hell of a lot of performance. The car would also have been less reliable and that's not what I was looking for.

I love my NSX, but 30k miles was enough. It's time to move on.
Old 05-17-2005, 07:16 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
DbleNckel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: O.C./I.E., CA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05' MB C-dblenckel
Originally Posted by AgentQ
Well, as I'm about to sell my NSX (just bought my C55), I have a say on this one. I.

I love my NSX, but 30k miles was enough. It's time to move on.

great write up!! and welcome!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: two quick contests, nrx and honda 200



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.