C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

335i a threat to C55 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-11-2006, 11:45 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hubert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 2,157
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
14'G63 AMG ,1994 Mercedes E500, 2020 Range Rover HST
No M3 or M5 ever smoked me since i put on my Kleemann.
Old 09-11-2006, 11:50 AM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
What power you putting out? Doubt you've met an E60 M5 on the highway, they reallly move.
Old 09-11-2006, 12:05 PM
  #28  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
ChicagoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W211 E55
Originally Posted by EvilllEmpirE
Smoke it?! I don't think so......blah blah blah and prob mid-hi 13's and will prob trap in the lo 100's stock. blah blah speculation conjecture.
.....and I'll spank you in my modded v12tt scooter...

How many speculative, unfounded, irrelavent arguments can one actually put in one post?

Sad, really. Needing to troll on boards unrelated to your marque...
Old 09-11-2006, 05:09 PM
  #29  
Member
 
Andras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ferrara, Italy
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 K AMG 03/2002
Originally Posted by EvilllEmpirE
Smoke it?! I don't think so......the new 335Ci Twin Turbo I6 does 0-60 in 5 seconds and prob mid-hi 13's and will prob trap in the lo 100's stock. That would keep up just fine with a stock C32 AMG. Now if you wanna get sticky, add a ECU chip, exhaust and you will be faster than a C32, no doubt. Ahhh, the MAGIC of Twin-Turbo Forced Induction....it's hard to beat sometimes
Ciao,
335i's twin turbo system's pretty different from RS4/RS6 etc.
It features a small and a large turbochargers that work as follows:
at low rpm only the small one works
at medium rpm both turbocharger works
at high rpm only the big turbocharger works
this means 335i doesn't have RS4/RS6 wild "rage", but virtually has no turbolag at all.
Just like 535d it kind reminds of an electric engine at low rpm
It has a lot of performance to rely on, first dyno (europe testings) showed 330/340hp instead of 306hp official figure
Match that with the superb 6 speed manual from BMW and it is obvious that 335i VS C32 are pretty damn close in performance.
But I still think a stock C32 still has the edge on stock 335i
Not by far, but it should be a little ahead of the beemer
Alla prossima!

Last edited by Andras; 09-11-2006 at 05:12 PM.
Old 09-11-2006, 06:23 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TopGun32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
personally I would take the 335i over the C55 and C32 anyday out of the week.

The 203 is an old chassis and despite all of its updates with suspension, it will never handle and have the weight distribution of the bimmer.

I just purchased the E55, but it was a tough call over Bimmer. I could bought it if I wanted, but I needed 4 doors and a family cruiser not a sporty coup.

Give it 12 months and the 335i will be in the high 12's with trap speeds of about 109 and 110.

Right now they are in the mid 13's and trap speeds of 103 to 105. Similar to the C32 and trailing the C55 by a few tenths and miles

Chip and exhaust, downpipe and maybe a few other parts and it will be easily at 400hp.

As you all know the 300hp is down rated per Automobile magazine dyno. The car is putting down 270+/- to the wheels. Add another 60RWHP and you have 330RWHP (400hp range)

I love the styling too. I could care less about the interior.
Old 09-11-2006, 06:28 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TopGun32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Andras
Ciao,
335i's twin turbo system's pretty different from RS4/RS6 etc.
It features a small and a large turbochargers that work as follows:
at low rpm only the small one works
at medium rpm both turbocharger works
at high rpm only the big turbocharger works
this means 335i doesn't have RS4/RS6 wild "rage", but virtually has no turbolag at all.
Just like 535d it kind reminds of an electric engine at low rpm
It has a lot of performance to rely on, first dyno (europe testings) showed 330/340hp instead of 306hp official figure
Match that with the superb 6 speed manual from BMW and it is obvious that 335i VS C32 are pretty damn close in performance.
But I still think a stock C32 still has the edge on stock 335i
Not by far, but it should be a little ahead of the beemer
Alla prossima!

actually the turbos are small and symmetrical. 335i does not have the Asymmetrical design (1 small, 1 large)

You are correct about the dyno, it putting down more power.

Also the torque is available at 1900 rpmps or so.. much lower than my C32.

The c32 has no torque under 2900 rpms.
Old 09-11-2006, 06:45 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jgsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 C32
Originally Posted by TopGun32
actually the turbos are small and symmetrical. 335i does not have the Asymmetrical design (1 small, 1 large)

You are correct about the dyno, it putting down more power.

Also the torque is available at 1900 rpmps or so.. much lower than my C32.

The c32 has no torque under 2900 rpms.
Yup. With good reason, asymmetrical/sequential turbos look great on paper, but in reality, they suck.
Old 09-11-2006, 07:00 PM
  #33  
Member
 
Andras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ferrara, Italy
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 K AMG 03/2002
Originally Posted by TopGun32
actually the turbos are small and symmetrical. 335i does not have the Asymmetrical design (1 small, 1 large)

You are correct about the dyno, it putting down more power.

Also the torque is available at 1900 rpmps or so.. much lower than my C32.

The c32 has no torque under 2900 rpms.
are you totally sure about 335i not being Asymmetrical?
Here in europe the fuzz was all about this car using the same system of the 535d (i.e. the Asymmetrical one).
Some pics would help........
Old 09-11-2006, 07:24 PM
  #34  
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
white and whiter
335i when the sedan comes out mid 2007-08. I'm gonna check it out. The E92 coupe's rear's does not belong on that car.

as far as which car is faster stock vs stock...let's just say C55>C32>335i manual in small margins.

modded it's hard to say, but the HIGH HP tuning ability of the turbo engine is out there and far better than supercharged cars. The 335 should easily see 360-380hp with few mods, but as far as changing the turbo out like you can do with the S4 that's another story. all depends on if aftermarket tuners want to make a E92 M3 killer out of a E92/90 335.

it's a simple fact that newer cars are quicker and faster by the miniutes as technology keeps moving forward. There's no point in arguing old versus new. You wouldn't see people saying an E30 M3 is POS versus the 330i now would you? or the C36 is POS versus the C350?

Last edited by FrankW; 09-11-2006 at 07:30 PM.
Old 09-11-2006, 08:15 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MercedesFTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cee Fiddy Five
The turbos are two VERY small ones of equal size.
Old 09-11-2006, 08:38 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jgsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 C32
Originally Posted by FrankW
it's a simple fact that newer cars are quicker and faster by the miniutes as technology keeps moving forward. There's no point in arguing old versus new. You wouldn't see people saying an E30 M3 is POS versus the 330i now would you? or the C36 is POS versus the C350?
I completely agree
Old 09-11-2006, 09:23 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
knepster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gl450
More 335 reviews

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2204
http://www.bmwcca.org/files/roundel/...tember2006.pdf
Old 09-11-2006, 11:20 PM
  #38  
Super Member
 
IdriveFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Who cares if a 06-07 335I is faster than a 02 C32. A car thats 5 yrs newer is almost as fast as a older car. Is this supposed to be some kind of accomplishment?!?!



P.S. Audi sucks ball. The RS4 sucks as well. at 80k its a joke of a car and Audi blows.
Old 09-11-2006, 11:26 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
mthomas141's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 S4
80k for an RS4? I dont know where you get your stuff from but, you need to chill out a little
Old 09-11-2006, 11:34 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jgsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 C32
Originally Posted by IdriveFast
Who cares if a 06-07 335I is faster than a 02 C32. A car thats 5 yrs newer is almost as fast as a older car. Is this supposed to be some kind of accomplishment?!?!
Uhhh, yeah, it is. The 335 isn't the performance version, while the C32 was.
If the new C350 had the same performance as the E46 M3 these forums would be on fire about it

Last edited by jgsx; 09-11-2006 at 11:39 PM.
Old 09-11-2006, 11:42 PM
  #41  
Super Member
 
IdriveFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by mthomas141
80k for an RS4? I dont know where you get your stuff from but, you need to chill out a little
my friend visited an Audi dealership and he said he saw a RS4 for 80k

I do believe an RS4 would come out to about 80k after options, tax, and title anyways.
Old 09-11-2006, 11:48 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
mthomas141's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 S4
loaded its about $71,000, but base price is $66,000.
Old 09-11-2006, 11:49 PM
  #43  
Super Member
 
IdriveFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by jgsx
Uhhh, yeah, it is. The 335 isn't the performance version, while the C32 was.
If the new C350 had the same performance as the E46 M3 these forums would be on fire about it
no its not. this kind of stuff happens every generation.

its supposed to be a regular model catching up performance-wise to a older special model. thats call progress. like i said this happens every generation.

if it was a newer special model just catching up in performance to a older special model, while costing 20k more....then....well...only audi manages to do that (RS4 vs C32/C55 M3 ).
Old 09-11-2006, 11:58 PM
  #44  
Super Member
 
IdriveFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by mthomas141
loaded its about $71,000, but base price is $66,000.
i stand corrected. you are right.

then the RS4 doesnt cost 20k more than a C55 it only costs 11k
Old 09-12-2006, 12:01 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
mthomas141's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 S4
Yea Audi really seems to be behind a little bit. I do have an 05' S4 and its great cause I live in MN and quattro is worth a ton to me. The S4 should be what the RS4 is.
Old 09-12-2006, 02:15 AM
  #46  
Member
 
Andras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ferrara, Italy
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 K AMG 03/2002
Originally Posted by sdsilverm3
For a NA car the C55 sure does have crappy throttle response. I haven't driven the 335i but I doubt BMW would screw that up.
ever thought of purchasing the sprintbooster?
Old 09-12-2006, 05:10 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
EvilllEmpirE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
Originally Posted by ChicagoX
.....and I'll spank you in my modded v12tt scooter...

How many speculative, unfounded, irrelavent arguments can one actually put in one post?

Sad, really. Needing to troll on boards unrelated to your marque...
LOL oh puleeeze......what "speculative, unfounded, irrelavent arguments" did I put in that post? Please do tell me? My reponse was to Zeppeling who stated "A 4 year old C32 is half the price of the 335i and will smoke it" Smoke it? Again...not true as the new 335Ci would do just fine (perhaps a tad slower) vs. a C32. So again...please tell me how I'm off base stating facts about the perfomance of the new 335 Ci and how it'd do vs a C32? I'd like to hear this one? Also, this is a "Public Auto" forum...is it not?

PS. That must be one fast Scooter ya got

Last edited by EvilllEmpirE; 09-12-2006 at 05:15 AM.
Old 09-12-2006, 05:21 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
EvilllEmpirE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
Originally Posted by Andras
hopefully Evilempire doesn't have a super-mega-hyper-beefed up 335i yet
therefore yes, C32's quicker than 335i. But 335i is pretty damn good too........
No.....not yet LOL Srsly though, the 335Ci seems like a very fun car fer sure.....and even though the jury is still out on the styling, the powerplant would make me consider and buy it over the new V8 M3...thats fer sure. It's like you said "pretty damn good"
Old 09-12-2006, 10:07 AM
  #49  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
ChicagoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W211 E55
Originally Posted by EvilllEmpirE
LOL oh puleeeze......what "speculative, unfounded, irrelavent arguments" did I put in that post? Please do tell me? ..... Also, this is a "Public Auto" forum...is it not?

"..the new 335Ci Twin Turbo I6 does 0-60 in 5 seconds and prob mid-hi 13's and will prob trap in the lo 100's stock. "

The twice-applied "prob", short for "probably" is what is known in English as speculation. As in, "you will probably be a dumba$$ your whole life...."

Here's the irrelavent part, pay close attention:

" Now if you wanna get sticky, add a ECU chip, exhaust and you will be faster than a C32, no doubt. Ahhh, the MAGIC of Twin-Turbo Forced Induction....it's hard to beat sometimes."

Now you are comparing a MODDED car to a stock one...completely irrelavent. Unless, that is, you enjoy comparing your Audi to modded Civics and the like. How about a race between a $9000 modded civic and your car for titles? No? How about for dollars? No? That's what I thought...

As far as this being a public place, yes it is. We even allow your type here.... I doubt you need much reminding, but you can still be kicked out of "public places"......

Anything else need clarification, sweetheart?
Old 09-12-2006, 10:13 AM
  #50  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Um.
V8 > I6.
There is no replacement, for displacement.
Enough said.

BTW: E90 as a whole > W203. Wait for W204 to come out and we'll ask again.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 335i a threat to C55 ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM.