Debating on purchasing C32/C55
I've been looking at the C32 and the C55.
First, are there any mechanical/electrical issues with either model?
Also any advice from fellow owners?
Thanks, I appreciate any advice you guys have.
Now the best I can find is 13k miles.
I just don't want to pick up a badly abused one.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
However, if you value handling at all, get the C55. It's revised suspension/chassis offers grip/handling that approaches the M3. The C32 has softer suspension and correspondingly poorer handling with a more comfortable ride (stock, of course).
However, if you value handling at all, get the C55. It's revised suspension/chassis offers grip/handling that approaches the M3. The C32 has softer suspension and correspondingly poorer handling with a more comfortable ride (stock, of course).
Last edited by Fifth Ring; Nov 3, 2006 at 01:23 PM.
Having said that, I usually look to Sport Auto's Supertest to compare the handling capabilities of cars. They use the same pro driver for all their Supertests and they have a set testing procedure they have been using for many years.
Nordschleife laptime
M3 (E46): 8.22 minutes
C55 (W203): 8.22 minutes
S4 Avant (B6): 8.29 minutes
C32 (W203): 8:37 minutes
Hockenheim laptime
M3: 1.17.6 minutes
C55: 1.18.6 minutes
S4 Avant: 1.19.1 minutes
C32: 1.20.6 minutes
36m slalom course
M3: 123km/h
C55: 122km/h
S4 Avant: 121km/h
C32: 118km/h
110m evasive course
M3: 136km/h
C55: 134km/h
S4 Avant: 130km/h
C32: 132km/h
And even if you look at N. American magazines (like Road & Track), the C55 has slightly higher skidpad grip and slalom speeds than the C32, making the data very consistent.
I don't know whether all of this is "exagerated" or not. What I do think is that these is a difference between these cars when you push them to their limits. On everyday roads, it is unlikely you will benefit from the "superior" handling capabilities unless you drive like a maniac around turns (or if you are lucky enough to live where there are deserted twisty roads which allow you drive fast).
Of course, after the driver, the second most important factor is tires. I don't know what tires were OEM, or tested. And of course, there's HP, and the C55 has a tad more of that.
Also, I've seen first hand how much more power the C32 makes in cool weather (cool, dense air = HP), while the C55 is probably more consistent.
We may never know exactly how much the suspension contributed to the better test times, but I'll give you a few tenths.
Last edited by Fifth Ring; Nov 3, 2006 at 02:24 PM.
.................. On everyday roads, it is unlikely you will benefit from the "superior" handling capabilities unless you drive like a maniac around turns (or if you are lucky enough to live where there are deserted twisty roads which allow you drive fast).
well said.
It has helped me consider things I never thought of.
I will still be on the prowl for a local low mileage one *keeps fingers crossed*
that will slay all other AMG's that oppose it.
The facts that it handles better (significantly, I think) and can be modded to produce 600 HP if you get severely hooked make this easy, I think. The prices have dropped on both models to the point where a newer car with the advantages of lower mileage, longer warranty, reliability, handling and potential is not that much more expensive.
that will slay all other AMG's that oppose it.
If your considering supercharging a C55, I would suggest just starting out with an E55 instead.
But a SC C55 will be faster then a E55.
That's why you do basic mods to the E55, then there is room for even more power if you want it later
There are some known issues with both cars. The only really big issue is some of the early C32 Valeo radiators, that can leak fluid into the transmission. Some of the early C32s, also feel funny, when the lockup torque converter clutch engages at low RPM. There are a couple of people that had drivetrain vibration problems.
Sometimes the C32 blower or blower clutch needs to be replaced, but seems to be fairly rare. Also a few people have had a leaking intercooler.
The suspension bushings tend to go bad after 30k-40k miles and may need replacement, just feels less cushioned, when it goes.
Other stuff is pretty minor, like the SC coolant pump and seat tracks.
I am toying with the idea of selling my '05 C55 with 23k miles if you might be leaning that way. I just have too many cars right now.





