Those with C32 and SL55 Y-Pipe.... - Page 3

Nov 11, 2007 | 11:51 PM

#51

Eurocharged Rick

SPONSOR

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 2,517

Likes: 1

From: Ohio

...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShawnQ

I plan to try it at the track, and will also do a pulley swap and tune eventually. If I can afford it, I'll dyno with and without it to see what I come up with.

I just couldn't believe that I LOST 10hp with it? Didn't make much sense!

SQ

when you went to the dyno, what setup had you been running on the car right before you dyno'd?

Nov 12, 2007 | 09:23 AM

#52

ShawnQ

Thread Starter

Junior Member

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 39

Likes: 0

SRT-6 (3.2 AMG)

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1FASTC32

when you went to the dyno, what setup had you been running on the car right before you dyno'd?

I had been running the SL55 Pipe for approximately 200miles or so. Dyno runs 4 and 5 were with the SL55 pipe (these were the first two after the guy figured out he couldn't punch it or it would kick down)...and 7/8 were with the stock pipe. The runs were in numerical order.

SQ

Nov 13, 2007 | 09:29 AM

#53

turbo16lbs

Super Member

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 594

Likes: 2

From: Miami, FL

1991 Toyota MR2, 2002 C32 AMG

I believe that different engine configurations may yield different horsepower results. I also believe that the amount of airflow that your vehicle is producing with the stock pulley is playing a factor in your output horsepower. I'm sure that once more boost is generated, the Y-pipe will surely be necessary and in turn give you better results.

Nov 13, 2007 | 10:21 AM

#54

c32used

MBWorld Fanatic!

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 6,213

Likes: 8

LET C32 2002

I say dump it back to stock til you have a bigger PSI pulley installed then dyno with stock then with SL55 splitter to see if it works better with other mods instead.

Reply Subscribe