C32 Vs. 335I
Questions is how will the C32 pair against it? Who do you see winning this race?. I am a former C32 owner before obtaining my E55 and I know how fast these C32's are. My C32 had ASP pulley though. Thanks for the input.
Good luck to him. I think it is a driver dependant race to tell you the truth. It will be very close. Unfortunately, I think the Bimmer will have the advantage though, but it'll be a great race. Take care
Good luck to him. I think it is a driver dependant race to tell you the truth. It will be very close. Unfortunately, I think the Bimmer will have the advantage though, but it'll be a great race. Take care
Note: make sure the IC pump is working properly on the C32, they are famous for slowly failing just like the E55 pumps.

edited 2:31pm 12/19/02 (Well not a C32 but its next of kin the C55 and here is the link: https://mbworld.org/forums/kill-stories/220650-finally-got-take-down-335i.html )
Last edited by c32used; Dec 19, 2007 at 03:32 PM.
If the guy takes of good without much spinning then the C32 will take him imo...
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ght=e46+m3+c32
Questions is how will the C32 pair against it? Who do you see winning this race?. I am a former C32 owner before obtaining my E55 and I know how fast these C32's are. My C32 had ASP pulley though. Thanks for the input.
Both of us didn't have much experience drag racing, so I guess skill wise it was an equal match.
I beat the 335i on both occasions quite single handedly.
However, I think if the 335i gets modded it will be a different story.
With turbo cars being fairly easy to mod initially with just a chip, I would seriously consider buying one if it weren't so ugly.
they tend to have less drivetrain loss than MB products. ( we have a torque converter that zaps power)
so.. 320 to 330 is about right
depends who has the best power band... will win.
from a dig.. I think the 335 will have an edge due to the better automatic 6 speed box.
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...ght=e46+m3+c32
I only posted the 335i figures so that people who weren't aware could know what the car's tested performance has been. Back in the day the C32, driven by pro test drivers, usually managed a 4.9-5.1 0-60 time, and 13.5 - 13.6 ET with mph around 105 or 106. Therefore, if the 335 is doing roughly 4.8 and 13.4 @ 105 (with presumably a similiarly skilled test driver), these cars are EXTREMELY evenly matched, stock for stock. Should be a driver's race in the end.
I only posted the 335i figures so that people who weren't aware could know what the car's tested performance has been. Back in the day the C32, driven by pro test drivers, usually managed a 4.9-5.1 0-60 time, and 13.5 - 13.6 ET with mph around 105 or 106. Therefore, if the 335 is doing roughly 4.8 and 13.4 @ 105 (with presumably a similiarly skilled test driver), these cars are EXTREMELY evenly matched, stock for stock. Should be a driver's race in the end.
Last edited by c32used; Dec 20, 2007 at 07:11 PM.
I only posted the 335i figures so that people who weren't aware could know what the car's tested performance has been. Back in the day the C32, driven by pro test drivers, usually managed a 4.9-5.1 0-60 time, and 13.5 - 13.6 ET with mph around 105 or 106. Therefore, if the 335 is doing roughly 4.8 and 13.4 @ 105 (with presumably a similiarly skilled test driver), these cars are EXTREMELY evenly matched, stock for stock. Should be a driver's race in the end.
So I'm guessing, it is probably somewhere in between those two figures, maybe 5.0 seconds. I'm sure it is not 4.8 seconds because that would be a slap on the face to the current M3 model drivers. Generally, reviews numbers will vary all over the place depending on how "close" that magazine to the car manufacturer.







! You will go places..