C32 > , < , = Clk550?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
C32 > , < , = Clk550?
Hey guys
I just dropped off my C32 at the stealership and was shocked to get an almost brand-spanking new CLK550. I did not realize how much power these things had. 382 hp @ 6000 rpm and 391 lb-ft @ 2800-4800 rpm. It weighs ~3720 lbs, compared to ~3540 for the C32.
Now, it definitely feels faster (and might be) than my stock C32. Though, I cant decide if it actually feels faster than my pullied C32 or if it is just that low-end V8 torque on that car that makes it "feel" faster.
Opinions?
Any C32, stock or modified, have any run-ins with one?
I just dropped off my C32 at the stealership and was shocked to get an almost brand-spanking new CLK550. I did not realize how much power these things had. 382 hp @ 6000 rpm and 391 lb-ft @ 2800-4800 rpm. It weighs ~3720 lbs, compared to ~3540 for the C32.
Now, it definitely feels faster (and might be) than my stock C32. Though, I cant decide if it actually feels faster than my pullied C32 or if it is just that low-end V8 torque on that car that makes it "feel" faster.
Opinions?
Any C32, stock or modified, have any run-ins with one?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 8
LET C32 2002
Well enjoy the fact that they lent you a CLK550 I can't say much of those but based on the numbers you mentioned it definitely sounds fast but I bet the extra weight will hamper it at some point or another...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,213
Likes: 8
LET C32 2002
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: The Woodlands, TX
C32 AMG
I know that the CLK550 is marginally faster than the old clk55. I still am not certain which is quicker, but v8's can be very deceiving. You may want to post up in the CLK part of this site and see what people say... or at least troll there.
-Mike
-Mike
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
CLK550s do indeed have an extra 30 hp or so, but you have to remember they also lack the AMG tuning. They do not have the AMG ECU software optimized for performance rather than luxury (which Mercedes focuses on). Also, they do not have AMG speedshift in that 7 speed tranny. Of course all the other goodies play a small role as well: lighter wheels, brakes, suspension, etc....
I think both cars should be very close in performance, but I truely believe that once the 550 engine gets a good ECU tune, it'll definately have an edge. Mercedes has a history of leaving plenty of power on the table and once an aftermarket companies start taking advantage of that, you'll see these cars really shine.
However, when it comes to a stage 1 or 2 C32, I don't think the 550s have a chance.
I think both cars should be very close in performance, but I truely believe that once the 550 engine gets a good ECU tune, it'll definately have an edge. Mercedes has a history of leaving plenty of power on the table and once an aftermarket companies start taking advantage of that, you'll see these cars really shine.
However, when it comes to a stage 1 or 2 C32, I don't think the 550s have a chance.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
CLK550s do indeed have an extra 30 hp or so, but you have to remember they also lack the AMG tuning. They do not have the AMG ECU software optimized for performance rather than luxury (which Mercedes focuses on). Also, they do not have AMG speedshift in that 7 speed tranny. Of course all the other goodies play a small role as well: lighter wheels, brakes, suspension, etc....
I think both cars should be very close in performance, but I truely believe that once the 550 engine gets a good ECU tune, it'll definately have an edge. Mercedes has a history of leaving plenty of power on the table and once an aftermarket companies start taking advantage of that, you'll see these cars really shine.
However, when it comes to a stage 1 or 2 C32, I don't think the 550s have a chance.
I think both cars should be very close in performance, but I truely believe that once the 550 engine gets a good ECU tune, it'll definately have an edge. Mercedes has a history of leaving plenty of power on the table and once an aftermarket companies start taking advantage of that, you'll see these cars really shine.
However, when it comes to a stage 1 or 2 C32, I don't think the 550s have a chance.
As far as the suspension goes, they are quite mushy and soft. They do not hold a candle to the suspension on the AMGs, at least that i have driven. the c32 and c55 have much tighter steering than the CLK550.
Super Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, California
07 E550, 02 C32, 91 300E
Ya when I first drove our E550, I was shocked at how easily it lit up the rear tires and how much it pulled while accelerating. The new tranny really makes a difference while accelerating and the engine isnt spinning as fast at freeway speeds (I can take my foot off the gas and I hardly lose any speed). Even bigger diff than my old 300E haha.
But the weight really feels like it is there even though the airmatic smooths out some of the body roll.
But the weight really feels like it is there even though the airmatic smooths out some of the body roll.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
you make an excellent point. while driving it around yesterday, i noticed that when i manually shifted it, either using the paddle shifters or the regular shift stick, it had some lag in between shifts. the AMG speedshift is so much quicker than the shifting in that 7Gtronic. It is quite noticeable.
As far as the suspension goes, they are quite mushy and soft. They do not hold a candle to the suspension on the AMGs, at least that i have driven. the c32 and c55 have much tighter steering than the CLK550.
As far as the suspension goes, they are quite mushy and soft. They do not hold a candle to the suspension on the AMGs, at least that i have driven. the c32 and c55 have much tighter steering than the CLK550.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 9
From: OC
a quarter mile at a time
Yes the AMG speedshift enhancement makes the transmission shift 35 to 50% faster than the normal Mercedes tranny. Also, the AMG ECU tuning optimizes power output when at WOT. I'm sure also the suspension and other components help transfer weight and power better when racing for a dig. Also the high performance light alloy wheels and high performance brakes make it generally easier to accelerate and brake. The AMG models get a lot more goodies than just engine power
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Although I'd agree with you on the speedshift enhancements, some of the other points aren't valid in comparison to the CLK550. ECU tuning is totally moot because power is power. Yes the 550 engine could benefit from the AMG tuning, but that dosen't change the fact that even without it, it still makes more power than the C32 or the C55. I'm not 100% certain about the CLK550 but the C-Class sport sedans got the same sway bars and suspension components from the C55. The CLK550 most definitly has the AMG wheels from the C55/CLK55. The 4-piston fixed calipers and 13.6" rotors are also from the C55/CLK55.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 9
From: OC
a quarter mile at a time
can anyone confirm? the 18" double five spoke wheels look identical to the C55 wheels.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
This was not a result of more or less power from the engine, but I believe was tuning and better power transfer and use.As for the suspension, I'm not sure exactly of which part numbers they use, but I know in the E-Class, the AMG versions get a different suspension and steering rack, and even firmer airmatic programming.
In the end, what I mean to say is this: if you line up an AMG with a similarly powered Mercedes, the AMG should beat it because Mercedes are tuned more for luxurious and comfortable rides. Even a slightly more hp Mercedes would still have trouble vs an AMG.
Last edited by MB_Forever; Feb 19, 2008 at 07:49 PM.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
i should have clarified what AMG rims were on it.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 9
From: OC
a quarter mile at a time
About the ECU tuning...... I was in no way saying the C32 or C55 is producing more power. I was saying that the ECU tuning from AMG gives the car multiple advantages, such as, optimizing power output when WOT through A/F ratios, timing, etc.... This allows the car to use its power much more productively when racing. I did not say it gives the car more power. I've raced with multiple cars that were producing same hp as my C32 (when it was stock) and most of the time, my C32 pulled on them hard. I felt like the AMG engine was working hard and was pulling even harder This was not a result of more or less power from the engine, but I believe was tuning and better power transfer and use.
The wheels that come on the C-Class sport sedan are Mercedes wheels NOT AMG wheels. They are identical in design to the AMG ones and have the Mercedes symbol, but they are not actually AMG. They are made from different material and weight more. I think Mercedes uses those AMG-Design wheels to appeal to the younger crowd without charging them $1000 / rim.
As for the suspension, I'm not sure exactly of which part numbers they use, but I know in the E-Class, the AMG versions get a different suspension and steering rack, and even firmer airmatic programming.
In the end, what I mean to say is this: if you line up an AMG with a similarly powered Mercedes, the AMG should beat it because Mercedes are tuned more for luxurious and comfortable rides. Even a slightly more hp Mercedes would still have trouble vs an AMG.
This was not a result of more or less power from the engine, but I believe was tuning and better power transfer and use.The wheels that come on the C-Class sport sedan are Mercedes wheels NOT AMG wheels. They are identical in design to the AMG ones and have the Mercedes symbol, but they are not actually AMG. They are made from different material and weight more. I think Mercedes uses those AMG-Design wheels to appeal to the younger crowd without charging them $1000 / rim.
As for the suspension, I'm not sure exactly of which part numbers they use, but I know in the E-Class, the AMG versions get a different suspension and steering rack, and even firmer airmatic programming.
In the end, what I mean to say is this: if you line up an AMG with a similarly powered Mercedes, the AMG should beat it because Mercedes are tuned more for luxurious and comfortable rides. Even a slightly more hp Mercedes would still have trouble vs an AMG.
I never said that the C-Class sport sedans came with AMG wheels. I said the CLK550 did. Unless anyone proves otherwise, the 18" staggered wheels on the CLK550 are in fact the same AMG wheels that came on the C55 and CLK55. AMG wheels are also not known to be light weight.
AMG cars are great vehicles but facts are facts. Mercedes borrows parts from the AMG parts bin all the time. The 4-piston fixed caliper AMG brakes that came on your C32 are also found on the 2004.5 C230 Sport sedans, C350 Sports sedans, ML500's, ML55's, SL500's and S500's.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18,677
Likes: 9
From: OC
a quarter mile at a time
Although I HATE to say this, I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree. The debate about whether the CLK55 is faster than a CLK550 is not that trivial. I have not been able to find a definitive head to head comparison between the two cars. You really can't compare a MotorTrend or any other magazine number against an MB published number either. We all know MB is very very conservative about 0-60 times. As far as member results, I've searched the forum even before I started posting in this thread and found posts confirming both cars have won.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
CLK550s do indeed have an extra 30 hp or so, but you have to remember they also lack the AMG tuning. They do not have the AMG ECU software optimized for performance rather than luxury (which Mercedes focuses on). Also, they do not have AMG speedshift in that 7 speed tranny. Of course all the other goodies play a small role as well: lighter wheels, brakes, suspension, etc....
I think both cars should be very close in performance, but I truely believe that once the 550 engine gets a good ECU tune, it'll definately have an edge. Mercedes has a history of leaving plenty of power on the table and once an aftermarket companies start taking advantage of that, you'll see these cars really shine.
However, when it comes to a stage 1 or 2 C32, I don't think the 550s have a chance.
I think both cars should be very close in performance, but I truely believe that once the 550 engine gets a good ECU tune, it'll definately have an edge. Mercedes has a history of leaving plenty of power on the table and once an aftermarket companies start taking advantage of that, you'll see these cars really shine.
However, when it comes to a stage 1 or 2 C32, I don't think the 550s have a chance.
+1
I have big doubt a 550 engine powered MB has the same (better?) exhaust sound than my C55 W203 AMG
(cause I heard those S550 were dead quiet
) I aint even sure if a regular CLK sports seats hold better than ones on a C55. 7G is a plus plus no question.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
the 7G is nice, but like i mentioned earlier, it does not have the AMG SpeedShift. The shifting between gears is a little bit slow, which is a disadvantage.
Not sure about the comfort of the seats, but I miss the seat heaters on my C32 that arent on this loaner. lol.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Although I HATE to say this, I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree. The debate about whether the CLK55 is faster than a CLK550 is not that trivial. I have not been able to find a definitive head to head comparison between the two cars. You really can't compare a MotorTrend or any other magazine number against an MB published number either. We all know MB is very very conservative about 0-60 times. As far as member results, I've searched the forum even before I started posting in this thread and found posts confirming both cars have won.
About the members races..... personally, I've read more members saying C55 is faster than CLK550 than the other way around. But because both cars are close in performance, the driver will likely determine the outcome. However, if all things being equal: same road, same driver, same conditions, then the AMG will have an edge. So if you would drive a C32/C55 and time yourself a couple of times, then drive a CLK550 on same road with same conditions, I bet you will have a better time in C55 than CLK550.
