Can anyone help me make heads or tails of this???
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by mdncn2762; Oct 13, 2008 at 01:47 PM. Reason: added pics
Thanks in advance.
If your KW is 290 that means you have 388HP
1HP = 0.7456KW
Not sure that the newton meters are to torque but its much less than 525
IIRC, the multiplier for NM to Ft/lbs is 0.7376 and DIN to SAE divisor is 1.013
Healthy numbers. Who tuned your car?

How much HP and tq you have will be based on a solid number So I was just ballparking from the graph.
Are we talking to the wheels here? It seems high to me but im not complaining.. Should I subtract 17% for the drivetrain?Last edited by mdncn2762; Oct 13, 2008 at 02:44 PM.
New Dyno with LET tune and same MODS made 325.9 RWHP and 326.87 RWTQ assuming 17% drivetrain loss.
I lost some TQ and gained some HP? Is this a DynoJet VS Superflow Dyno thing?
Weather/ Temp maybe.
Last edited by mdncn2762; Oct 13, 2008 at 03:09 PM.
Thanks in advance.
http://www.onlineconversion.com/power.htm
Sorry bud, I can't figure out that dyno graph for the life of me... but it does appear that you're at 393 hp (292.8 kW) and 394 tq (534 Nm).
If that's at the wheels, you have one of (if not the) strongest "all-motor" C32's in the world. Could their software have been performing a "crank-conversion" calculation?
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Thanks in advance.
seems you had a very good time at Hennies
Chicago X and C32 AMG-DTM converted the HP correctly. The Graph shows 292 DIN-KW (398 HP at the crank/motor) and 534 NM (398 Lbft) at the crank. And Lambda 0,83 is approx. 12,09 A/F.
Regards Bruno
Last edited by AMG-Driver; Oct 14, 2008 at 10:52 AM.
seems you had a very good time at Hennies
Chicago X and C32 AMG-DTM converted the HP correctly. The Graph shows 292 DIN-KW (398 HP at the crank/motor) and 534 NM (398 Lbft) at the crank. And Lambda 0,83 is approx. 12,09 A/F.
Regards Bruno
If the dyno was somehow adding in a driveline loss assumption, you'd have to take that back out to get the numbers at the wheels.
398/398 at the crank would be 326/326 @ the wheels, assuming 18% driveline losses
398/398 at the crank would be 330/330 @ the wheels, assuming 17% driveline losses
healthy numbers either way - I'm only putting down a bit higher, and I have a similar (or same) tune, 181mm crank pulley, and headers.
If the dyno was somehow adding in a driveline loss assumption, you'd have to take that back out to get the numbers at the wheels.
398/398 at the crank would be 326/326 @ the wheels, assuming 18% driveline losses
398/398 at the crank would be 330/330 @ the wheels, assuming 17% driveline losses
healthy numbers either way - I'm only putting down a bit higher, and I have a similar (or same) tune, 181mm crank pulley, and headers.
Other things to consider would be addressing bottlenecks on the intake and/or exhaust side...
GL mdncn... I'll probably be pursuing similar mods in the near future; will let you know my results if/when I do.
VRP is selling headers right now for $899.






