Stacked Pulleys..
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 IWC
Stacked Pulleys..
Does anyone have any hard information on having the Code3 S/C pulley and any of the various crank pulleys available? Iam sure alot of people on this forum would love to know more about the possibilities of this mod.. I figured no one has started a thread about them yet, but it was eventually going to happen and I cant wait to know more!!!!
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
Thanks,
Jm
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
Thanks,
Jm
#2
Does anyone have any hard information on having the Code3 S/C pulley and any of the various crank pulleys available? Iam sure alot of people on this forum would love to know more about the possibilities of this mod.. I figured no one has started a thread about them yet, but it was eventually going to happen and I cant wait to know more!!!!
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
Thanks,
Jm
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
Thanks,
Jm
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...725&highlight=
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Eleventeen has done it. Do a search on this forum, also the SRT-6 Crossfire forum. Anything over a 178 with the C3 is dubious, although it might be feasible with a larger intake manifold (increased volume/reduced boost pressure). Of course then there's the fuel issue etc., etc...
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...725&highlight=
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...725&highlight=
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55 IWC
Well I have looked every where for information and nothing is very informative, otherwise I wouldnt have even started the thread.. I have read threw our forums there forums and various other ones; stil havent found any good information... I thought Code3 was doing some testing? If they would chime in and give us something instead of nothing it would be great..
Thanks,
Jm
Thanks,
Jm
#5
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
If you search you will find what you are looking for. There are a couple people doing it. Eleveteen stands out as a member that has it. I know the boost is at max.
Does anyone have any hard information on having the Code3 S/C pulley and any of the various crank pulleys available? Iam sure alot of people on this forum would love to know more about the possibilities of this mod.. I figured no one has started a thread about them yet, but it was eventually going to happen and I cant wait to know more!!!!
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
Thanks,
Jm
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
Thanks,
Jm
#6
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon12.gif)
The caveats are:
1. Max boost, if running a crank pulley larger than 178mm
2. Belt slip
C3P is working on a solution to the latter.
Stay tuned for some VERY exciting mods coming.
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
#7
Just vaporware and hype.
Trending Topics
#8
#11
Eleventeen has done it. Do a search on this forum, also the SRT-6 Crossfire forum. Anything over a 178 with the C3 is dubious, although it might be feasible with a larger intake manifold (increased volume/reduced boost pressure). Of course then there's the fuel issue etc., etc...
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...725&highlight=
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...725&highlight=
I like this answer the best
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#12
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C32 AMG
I actually just posted up yesterday on Crossfireforum.org about this:
This set up has physically worked well so far, but it has only been about 4-5 months. However, the ECU doesn't like seeing the peak boost. I keep getting P0108 - MAP Circuit High Input code since I am maxing out the MAP (just barely) at 22 psi in 3rd. I really need to get it on the dyno to see what actually happens when I hit that pressure. Upper RPM doesn't seem to be much different from the ASP alone (if any), but lower and mid-range RPM's pull hard. It now hits 12 lbs. of boost by 2000 RPM and maybe even a little sooner (hard to watch boost gauge and tach at the same time). A more precise dyno tune, rather than my mail-in, and controlling IAT spikes should make for more top-end power. Overall, the car DEFINITELY feels faster on the street than it did with the ASP alone (due to all the extra low to mid-range power). I'm not sure how it will translate at the strip where you spend more time in the upper RPM range. I plan on hitting the track in the next week or two, so I'll post up as soon as soon as I have some 1/4 mile numbers.![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
P.S. The C32 MAP is a typical 3 wire 5V setup. The P0108 CEL can be remedied by using a standard MAP clamp, which I do have, but I need to get the car on the dyno to get it safely dialed in.
This set up has physically worked well so far, but it has only been about 4-5 months. However, the ECU doesn't like seeing the peak boost. I keep getting P0108 - MAP Circuit High Input code since I am maxing out the MAP (just barely) at 22 psi in 3rd. I really need to get it on the dyno to see what actually happens when I hit that pressure. Upper RPM doesn't seem to be much different from the ASP alone (if any), but lower and mid-range RPM's pull hard. It now hits 12 lbs. of boost by 2000 RPM and maybe even a little sooner (hard to watch boost gauge and tach at the same time). A more precise dyno tune, rather than my mail-in, and controlling IAT spikes should make for more top-end power. Overall, the car DEFINITELY feels faster on the street than it did with the ASP alone (due to all the extra low to mid-range power). I'm not sure how it will translate at the strip where you spend more time in the upper RPM range. I plan on hitting the track in the next week or two, so I'll post up as soon as soon as I have some 1/4 mile numbers.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
P.S. The C32 MAP is a typical 3 wire 5V setup. The P0108 CEL can be remedied by using a standard MAP clamp, which I do have, but I need to get the car on the dyno to get it safely dialed in.
Last edited by Eleventeen; 10-16-2008 at 10:25 AM.
#13
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 Crossfire SRT6
stacked pulleys
Here is the link to the other forum. Brian Brave put up some great numbers that make it easier to understand. Thanks Brian.
http://www.crossfireforum.org/forum/...ad.php?t=28783
http://www.crossfireforum.org/forum/...ad.php?t=28783
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: FT POLK LOUISIANA
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1992 Toyota Corolla, 1994 Chevy C1500, 2002 C32, 2012 Prius, 2013 Toyota Sienna
Eleventeen
Are you still running this setup? If so how is it holding up? Any new info?
Thanks
Are you still running this setup? If so how is it holding up? Any new info?
Thanks
I actually just posted up yesterday on Crossfireforum.org about this:
This set up has physically worked well so far, but it has only been about 4-5 months. However, the ECU doesn't like seeing the peak boost. I keep getting P0108 - MAP Circuit High Input code since I am maxing out the MAP (just barely) at 22 psi in 3rd. I really need to get it on the dyno to see what actually happens when I hit that pressure. Upper RPM doesn't seem to be much different from the ASP alone (if any), but lower and mid-range RPM's pull hard. It now hits 12 lbs. of boost by 2000 RPM and maybe even a little sooner (hard to watch boost gauge and tach at the same time). A more precise dyno tune, rather than my mail-in, and controlling IAT spikes should make for more top-end power. Overall, the car DEFINITELY feels faster on the street than it did with the ASP alone (due to all the extra low to mid-range power). I'm not sure how it will translate at the strip where you spend more time in the upper RPM range. I plan on hitting the track in the next week or two, so I'll post up as soon as soon as I have some 1/4 mile numbers.![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
P.S. The C32 MAP is a typical 3 wire 5V setup. The P0108 CEL can be remedied by using a standard MAP clamp, which I do have, but I need to get the car on the dyno to get it safely dialed in.
This set up has physically worked well so far, but it has only been about 4-5 months. However, the ECU doesn't like seeing the peak boost. I keep getting P0108 - MAP Circuit High Input code since I am maxing out the MAP (just barely) at 22 psi in 3rd. I really need to get it on the dyno to see what actually happens when I hit that pressure. Upper RPM doesn't seem to be much different from the ASP alone (if any), but lower and mid-range RPM's pull hard. It now hits 12 lbs. of boost by 2000 RPM and maybe even a little sooner (hard to watch boost gauge and tach at the same time). A more precise dyno tune, rather than my mail-in, and controlling IAT spikes should make for more top-end power. Overall, the car DEFINITELY feels faster on the street than it did with the ASP alone (due to all the extra low to mid-range power). I'm not sure how it will translate at the strip where you spend more time in the upper RPM range. I plan on hitting the track in the next week or two, so I'll post up as soon as soon as I have some 1/4 mile numbers.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
P.S. The C32 MAP is a typical 3 wire 5V setup. The P0108 CEL can be remedied by using a standard MAP clamp, which I do have, but I need to get the car on the dyno to get it safely dialed in.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Don't get me wrong, the Code3 Pulley runs great and I haven't had ANY issues with it, but i want more power.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Morehead, KY USA
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
SLK55 AMG, E320 BlueTec, ML350, (formerly) C32 AMG, MR2 Turbo, HD-FLH-FSE, BMW R100RS, Ducati M900
Pulleys
So, how much boost does the Code 3 pulley alone peak at? and what peak level of boost (roughly) can be generated with a 185mm crank pulley as an alternative? What is normal peak stock boost?
How much boost is too much on these cars? I read that hitting 22psi is causing overboost ECU code? That sounds quite high for pump gas.
I would like to find a safe performance increase with modest gains while keeping the car reliable. Does the belt slip on the smaller Code3 SC pulley? How much gain does it offer?
Irish
How much boost is too much on these cars? I read that hitting 22psi is causing overboost ECU code? That sounds quite high for pump gas.
I would like to find a safe performance increase with modest gains while keeping the car reliable. Does the belt slip on the smaller Code3 SC pulley? How much gain does it offer?
Irish
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
#20
I know, trust me - I have been without my car since October 1, or 10 weeks, and I have several thousand $ out of pocket ![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
I will be posting a thread VERY soon with my overall impressions vis-a-vis:
1. Performance outcome - before/after
2. Supplier response and ability/inability to deliver on promises
Stay tuned folks.
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
I will be posting a thread VERY soon with my overall impressions vis-a-vis:
1. Performance outcome - before/after
2. Supplier response and ability/inability to deliver on promises
Stay tuned folks.
#21
SPONSOR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes
on
109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
I know, trust me - I have been without my car since October 1, or 10 weeks, and I have several thousand $ out of pocket ![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
I will be posting a thread VERY soon with my overall impressions vis-a-vis:
1. Performance outcome - before/after
2. Supplier response and ability/inability to deliver on promises
Stay tuned folks.
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
I will be posting a thread VERY soon with my overall impressions vis-a-vis:
1. Performance outcome - before/after
2. Supplier response and ability/inability to deliver on promises
Stay tuned folks.
#22
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: FT POLK LOUISIANA
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1992 Toyota Corolla, 1994 Chevy C1500, 2002 C32, 2012 Prius, 2013 Toyota Sienna
So whats up Fellas, ASP + code 3, will it work or not? Any recommendations? I dont want to take the ASP pulley off,,,,lazy,,,,,If I can just add a SC pulley it would be
. What size crank pulley would be compared to this setup. 187mm, 188???
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#24
Super Moderator
They’ll physically work. However, Eleventeen and two SRT-6 enthusiasts who’ve attempted the combination suffered mixed and potentially catastrophic results. Seems the ECU and fuel supply system are inexorably overcome by the additional airflow.
One MIA sponsor that tested the setup promised he would have “injectors available with pricing in the next day or two” (in October) as a solution to going dangerously lean at WOT. He has yet to post again regarding their hardware.
Wouldn’t want to read of yours having melted a piston or two on the autobahn by chancing it before a suitable solution has been brought to market.
reference: https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...eave-room.html
One MIA sponsor that tested the setup promised he would have “injectors available with pricing in the next day or two” (in October) as a solution to going dangerously lean at WOT. He has yet to post again regarding their hardware.
Wouldn’t want to read of yours having melted a piston or two on the autobahn by chancing it before a suitable solution has been brought to market.
reference: https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...eave-room.html
#25
SPONSOR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes
on
109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
Safer bet would be to go to the 181 or 185 crank pully. Don't do the code3 plus asp, its not a good situation. I have been there presonally and have seen the car fall on its face. Its not worth the risk.