C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Question: Removing Secondary Cats (possible issues)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-27-2009, 03:11 AM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SoCalC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 593
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
2019 AMG C43
Question Question: Removing Secondary Cats (possible issues)

So I had planned on taking my car to my exhaust guy Tuesday to remove the secondary cats, along with gutting the baffles and such in the mufflers.

I was talking to a friend of mine, who worked for MB & is extremely knowledgeable, and he told me it may not be a good idea. He said that the computer would think the engine was running cold and in turn I would run lean and possible throw a check engine light.

To my knowledge there are only sensors on the primary cats so I’m unsure how it would run any differently with the secondary removed and the mufflers gutted. I would only expect a slight increase in flow and hopefully a noticeable increase in sound (main reason for even doing anything)

Input anyone?
Old 04-27-2009, 04:32 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by Mr. Special
So I had planned on taking my car to my exhaust guy Tuesday to remove the secondary cats, along with gutting the baffles and such in the mufflers.

I was talking to a friend of mine, who worked for MB & is extremely knowledgeable, and he told me it may not be a good idea. He said that the computer would think the engine was running cold and in turn I would run lean and possible throw a check engine light.

To my knowledge there are only sensors on the primary cats so I’m unsure how it would run any differently with the secondary removed and the mufflers gutted. I would only expect a slight increase in flow and hopefully a noticeable increase in sound (main reason for even doing anything)

Input anyone?
Mike (Hooleyboy) did this. No problems. And he even saw quite decent gains on the dyno from doing this. Search the forum for his thread, as he made one about this.
Old 04-27-2009, 04:49 AM
  #3  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
hooleyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
I did see a gain in chopping out my secondary cats. I would leave the stock mufflers just the way they are. I think that sound amazing. Get rid of the res and 2nd cats and you will have a sound you will love. search You Tube under my user name Hooleyboy. I got races and sound clips you can check out.
Old 04-27-2009, 10:21 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
rockjock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I DON'T COME HERE ANYMORE
You can dump the second cats-they serve no real purpose (emissions only)-the front bank are the ones that you need to get tuned out (remove the O2 sensor read) or have high flows installed-and I agree with Hooley-leave the muffs alone (or try and sell them-someone would like a set of AMG's on their car!)
Old 04-27-2009, 05:01 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2002 C32 Black/Charcoal
Originally Posted by rockjock
You can dump the second cats-they serve no real purpose (emissions only)-the front bank are the ones that you need to get tuned out (remove the O2 sensor read) or have high flows installed-and I agree with Hooley-leave the muffs alone (or try and sell them-someone would like a set of AMG's on their car!)
Actually, they do not even really serve any emissions purpose either, unless perhaps if your primaries were to stop doing their job. A good friend of mine had his track car (no resonators, no secondaries) smog tested and it passed California standards easily. The sound without secondaries/resonator is much better, IMO, and the car definitely feels faster.

Better sound, lose 20 lbs (res and secondaries), better performance, no smog issues. The only downside is the cost of removal, IMO.
Old 04-27-2009, 05:15 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Robert AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 1,096
Received 82 Likes on 60 Posts
Cls63 & C32
I removed the 4 cats, i installed custom muffles instead, it throws sometimes check engine light but all i can say that i use to race with a friend always door to door, after the 4 cats removed i put now 3 cars on him plus the sound very owesome and high.
Old 04-27-2009, 05:34 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
rockjock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I DON'T COME HERE ANYMORE
Yeah, what he said
Old 04-27-2009, 06:24 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by Vomit
Actually, they do not even really serve any emissions purpose either, unless perhaps if your primaries were to stop doing their job. A good friend of mine had his track car (no resonators, no secondaries) smog tested and it passed California standards easily. The sound without secondaries/resonator is much better, IMO, and the car definitely feels faster.

Better sound, lose 20 lbs (res and secondaries), better performance, no smog issues. The only downside is the cost of removal, IMO.
So is my car throwing the EC light because I have no Primaries? I'm thinking of adding 2 more high flow cats.
Old 04-27-2009, 08:51 PM
  #9  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SoCalC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 593
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
2019 AMG C43
Thanks for your responses everyone (keep them coming!)

Tomorrow I’ll just remove the secondary cats for now, see how I like it
Old 04-28-2009, 09:31 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2002 C32 Black/Charcoal
Originally Posted by ProjectC55
So is my car throwing the EC light because I have no Primaries? I'm thinking of adding 2 more high flow cats.
That would be my guess.
Old 04-28-2009, 06:08 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
Dude put O2 spacers on the last sensor and the CE is GONE
4$ BTW at autozone (sparkpulg spacers)
Old 04-28-2009, 07:28 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by Mikegpr03
Dude put O2 spacers on the last sensor and the CE is GONE
4$ BTW at autozone (sparkpulg spacers)
That's if I have the room. I guess we are talking about putting the spacers on the secondary O2 sensors correct?
Old 05-01-2009, 02:25 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mikegpr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami Dade, FL
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
C63
You have room if its a C55 (I did it to mine)
Old 05-01-2009, 10:50 AM
  #14  
Super Member
 
rockjock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I DON'T COME HERE ANYMORE
Its a common fix for CEL on O2's-buy 1-2 spark plug spacers (if you need 2-drill out the first one to the correct dia for the sensor) and use that in the bung to "push" the sensor out of the exhaust flow (it makes the ECU think there is resistance on the exhaust if it isnt getting the full stream on the O2 sensor tip)-
Old 05-01-2009, 11:22 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Robert AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 1,096
Received 82 Likes on 60 Posts
Cls63 & C32
by this way does the O2's make the ECU influence the A/F ratio or not??
Old 05-01-2009, 12:09 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
rockjock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I DON'T COME HERE ANYMORE
Nope-these are the second set of O2's we are tricking-not the fronts-the fronts monitor the AFR's-the rears....I dont know what those do on any car....really-anyone know? They're always narrow band....
Old 05-01-2009, 01:22 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Robert AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 1,096
Received 82 Likes on 60 Posts
Cls63 & C32
are you sure that the fronts monitor AFR? this is new to me.
Old 05-01-2009, 01:47 PM
  #18  
Super Member
 
rockjock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I DON'T COME HERE ANYMORE
99.9% sure-
Old 05-01-2009, 01:55 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Gramma_Benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Bay, Bay Area
Posts: 2,000
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
2002 C32, 2012 S550
Originally Posted by rockjock
99.9% sure-
Anyone done this on a C32?

Wondering if its too loud or still subtle. Or if it causes any codes to be thrown.

TIA!
Old 05-01-2009, 03:38 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by Gramma_Benz
Anyone done this on a C32?

Wondering if its too loud or still subtle. Or if it causes any codes to be thrown.

TIA!
deleting secondaries? not it 1000000% does not throw any codes. O2s are not over there. they are up front by the primaries.

C32s have definitely removed the secondary cats before. however, you will not see sizable gains like Hooleyboy did. You will have a slightly louder exhaust sound, will drop a little bit of weight, and will have a little better flowing exhaust. maybe a gain of 1-2whp, like with the resonator delete. however, if you ever did headers, deleting the resonator and secondary cats will net you more gains with the headers than if you had the resonator and secondary cats b/c these are no longer bottlenecks in the exhaust.
Old 05-01-2009, 07:30 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Gramma_Benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Bay, Bay Area
Posts: 2,000
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
2002 C32, 2012 S550
Originally Posted by jturkel
deleting secondaries? not it 1000000% does not throw any codes. O2s are not over there. they are up front by the primaries.

C32s have definitely removed the secondary cats before. however, you will not see sizable gains like Hooleyboy did. You will have a slightly louder exhaust sound, will drop a little bit of weight, and will have a little better flowing exhaust. maybe a gain of 1-2whp, like with the resonator delete. however, if you ever did headers, deleting the resonator and secondary cats will net you more gains with the headers than if you had the resonator and secondary cats b/c these are no longer bottlenecks in the exhaust.
Ahhh, so I see you're gonna do that next huh?

Cool, thanks brother. Hope you're feeling better.
Old 03-31-2011, 02:56 PM
  #22  
Member
 
newbenz2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Palm Beach
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
86 16v turbo, 02 c32
Originally Posted by rockjock
Its a common fix for CEL on O2's-buy 1-2 spark plug spacers (if you need 2-drill out the first one to the correct dia for the sensor) and use that in the bung to "push" the sensor out of the exhaust flow (it makes the ECU think there is resistance on the exhaust if it isnt getting the full stream on the O2 sensor tip)-
Did you stack two on top of each other then put in the o2 bung or just a single that was drilled? Also what size hole is needed to clear the o2 fillement for the secondary 02?
Old 03-31-2011, 06:22 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
mikekuriger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 854
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2010 C63
the o2 sensors are BEFORE the 2nd cats. Removing the 2nd cats has no affect on the computer.
Old 03-31-2011, 09:48 PM
  #24  
Member
 
newbenz2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Palm Beach
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
86 16v turbo, 02 c32
Originally Posted by mikekuriger
the o2 sensors are BEFORE the 2nd cats. Removing the 2nd cats has no affect on the computer.
I know but I'm removing both cats and running long tube headers.
Old 03-31-2011, 10:24 PM
  #25  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
AMS Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
AMG
You will have no problems. Although it is preferred to put in an X-pipe instead of just running two parallel straight pipes. It will improve scavenging effects and also help "clean up" the exhaust note quite a bit. You should pick up some low end part throttle torque, and high end HP WOT, but it won't really do anything in the mid range (maybe 1HP).

hope that helps.
AMS


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Question: Removing Secondary Cats (possible issues)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.