FS: Let 185 Pulley
08-26-2009, 10:26 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 c32 and 94 Bmw 325i
FS: Let 185 Pulley
Seeing if anyone is interested in my 185 Pulley Kit, I just bought it a few weeks ago and only has about 800 miles on it. im asking $700 i dont know what these go for used so let me know if its to high. If interested email me eazyd112@yahoo or u can call 330-242-6163 Thanks Derrick
Im also willing to trade for suspension like lowering springs,struts
Im also willing to trade for suspension like lowering springs,struts
08-27-2009, 09:17 PM
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 c32 and 94 Bmw 325i
well my plans were to try to make some power, but then i realized that these cars dont really make power with the supercharger thats on it so im leaving it stock and driving it
08-27-2009, 09:24 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
have you dyno'd yours? mine made 321 hp in stock form. with pulleys and tune power to the rear can approach 400 hp
08-27-2009, 09:39 PM
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 c32 and 94 Bmw 325i
I never dyno'd it i just looked at what they were making on here and im used to my dsms, big turbo,lots of fuel, high boost and call it a day im just gonna dd the c32 and stick to those
Trending Topics
08-27-2009, 09:55 PM
#8
you can definitely make some power with these things.
08-27-2009, 10:17 PM
#10
08-27-2009, 10:26 PM
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
08-27-2009, 11:57 PM
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Yeah, but IMHO you're misrepresenting a bit - that certainly wouldn't be an "average" result. "Pulley and tune can approach 400 rwhp" - LOL... wish it were that easy. 350 rwhp would even be on the high side of what's reasonable for a "pulley and tune" car, with 325-330 rwhp even being a very realistic result.
Most M112 Kompressor cars dyno in the 280-290 rwhp range when stock, at best... yours is atypical in that it's a solid 10-15% stronger than what's average. Three questions, just out of curiosity - what type of dyno did you run on, have you ever entertained the idea of dynoing somewhere different, and do you plan to obtain track data (ETs and trap speeds) to confirm/validate your dyno results?
Most M112 Kompressor cars dyno in the 280-290 rwhp range when stock, at best... yours is atypical in that it's a solid 10-15% stronger than what's average. Three questions, just out of curiosity - what type of dyno did you run on, have you ever entertained the idea of dynoing somewhere different, and do you plan to obtain track data (ETs and trap speeds) to confirm/validate your dyno results?
08-28-2009, 01:34 AM
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Yeah, but IMHO you're misrepresenting a bit - that certainly wouldn't be an "average" result. "Pulley and tune can approach 400 rwhp" - LOL... wish it were that easy. 350 rwhp would even be on the high side of what's reasonable for a "pulley and tune" car, with 325-330 rwhp even being a very realistic result.
Most M112 Kompressor cars dyno in the 280-290 rwhp range when stock, at best... yours is atypical in that it's a solid 10-15% stronger than what's average. Three questions, just out of curiosity - what type of dyno did you run on, have you ever entertained the idea of dynoing somewhere different, and do you plan to obtain track data (ETs and trap speeds) to confirm/validate your dyno results?
Most M112 Kompressor cars dyno in the 280-290 rwhp range when stock, at best... yours is atypical in that it's a solid 10-15% stronger than what's average. Three questions, just out of curiosity - what type of dyno did you run on, have you ever entertained the idea of dynoing somewhere different, and do you plan to obtain track data (ETs and trap speeds) to confirm/validate your dyno results?
08-28-2009, 01:50 AM
#14
after i retune for my headers and work on my cooling issues, i will go over to a dynojet and see if i can hit 400. i bet it will be really close
08-28-2009, 10:07 AM
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Okay - but the C3P intake mod is dyno proven to add, what 10-15 hp? And headers probably add about the same? So even Silver's tremendously impressive, monster DJ run (at a dyno that he said tends to give unrealistically high numbers), you'd probably subtract out 20+ rwhp for those mods. My car ran what was considered to be "strong" stock baseline runs in the 290 range - a 181 pulley, tune, shorty headers, and K&N filters got me into the 330s... on a DynoJet both times.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
08-28-2009, 10:48 AM
#16
SPONSOR
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston/ Austin /Toronto / UAE / Minneapolis / Orlando /Cincinnati
Posts: 5,459
Received 149 Likes
on
109 Posts
Eurocharged Performance ML63 and TT lambo
Okay - but the C3P intake mod is dyno proven to add, what 10-15 hp? And headers probably add about the same? So even Silver's tremendously impressive, monster DJ run (at a dyno that he said tends to give unrealistically high numbers), you'd probably subtract out 20+ rwhp for those mods. My car ran what was considered to be "strong" stock baseline runs in the 290 range - a 181 pulley, tune, shorty headers, and K&N filters got me into the 330s... on a DynoJet both times.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
and it does require ton of work.. at one point you max out the sc and it becomes the bottleneck
08-28-2009, 11:55 AM
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Okay - but the C3P intake mod is dyno proven to add, what 10-15 hp? And headers probably add about the same? So even Silver's tremendously impressive, monster DJ run (at a dyno that he said tends to give unrealistically high numbers), you'd probably subtract out 20+ rwhp for those mods. My car ran what was considered to be "strong" stock baseline runs in the 290 range - a 181 pulley, tune, shorty headers, and K&N filters got me into the 330s... on a DynoJet both times.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
I hit 326whp with a code3 pulley...a really conservative tune that runs slightly rich, code3 intake, heavy 19'' wheels, not being in dyno mode and in 85degree weather. This is on a dynojet.
Since you had a 181 pulley you should be getting high numbers since your running more boost.
08-28-2009, 02:06 PM
#18
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Del Sol & CRX LS/VTEC turbo
EazyD, your FS thread may be better off in this forum
https://mbworld.org/forums/engine-performance-101/
Has anyone rebuilt these engines? Are the pistons forged or cast?
https://mbworld.org/forums/engine-performance-101/
Has anyone rebuilt these engines? Are the pistons forged or cast?
08-28-2009, 03:12 PM
#19
Okay - but the C3P intake mod is dyno proven to add, what 10-15 hp? And headers probably add about the same? So even Silver's tremendously impressive, monster DJ run (at a dyno that he said tends to give unrealistically high numbers), you'd probably subtract out 20+ rwhp for those mods. My car ran what was considered to be "strong" stock baseline runs in the 290 range - a 181 pulley, tune, shorty headers, and K&N filters got me into the 330s... on a DynoJet both times.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
Vadim's R&D on his C32 back in the early stages of C32 product development seemed to suggest that 400rwhp requires a ton of work, and ultimately isn't likely to be reliable, sustainable performance. YMMV, naturally.
You guys are missing my point that these aren't "pulley and tune" cars, but nevertheless... carry on.
08-28-2009, 04:01 PM
#20
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2002 C32 1987 190E 2.3 334K miles and going
My 2002 C32 dyno'd 288 RWHP, 298 Torque on a Land and Sea.
Mods: C3 pulley, C3 air intake, IK16s and a Powerchip tune.
I've read stock C32s have about 268 thru low 270s RWHP.
08-28-2009, 04:53 PM
#21
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
I had thought about the 185mm pulley, but ultimately decide to stick with evosport's 178 kit I already have. theoretically 185 produce 3 more psi which on FI car should result some 20-30hp over the 178, but I haven't seen that to be much truth since on colder day 178 also will ran around 19-20 psi according to Splinter when he data-logged his evosport 178 kit.
185 still makes more power, but 178 at least in my opinion is a little more reliable with less heat soak issue
does anyone have dyno on w/ and w/o the secondary? on the C32?
08-28-2009, 05:28 PM
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
Yeah, but IMHO you're misrepresenting a bit - that certainly wouldn't be an "average" result. "Pulley and tune can approach 400 rwhp" - LOL... wish it were that easy. 350 rwhp would even be on the high side of what's reasonable for a "pulley and tune" car, with 325-330 rwhp even being a very realistic result.
Most M112 Kompressor cars dyno in the 280-290 rwhp range when stock, at best... yours is atypical in that it's a solid 10-15% stronger than what's average. Three questions, just out of curiosity - what type of dyno did you run on, have you ever entertained the idea of dynoing somewhere different, and do you plan to obtain track data (ETs and trap speeds) to confirm/validate your dyno results?
Most M112 Kompressor cars dyno in the 280-290 rwhp range when stock, at best... yours is atypical in that it's a solid 10-15% stronger than what's average. Three questions, just out of curiosity - what type of dyno did you run on, have you ever entertained the idea of dynoing somewhere different, and do you plan to obtain track data (ETs and trap speeds) to confirm/validate your dyno results?
and lastly i hope to meet a crossfire member called goodgenes79 with his srt6 and do some 1/4 runs!!
he has dual cai and c3 pulley with a wrap kit. i will have c3 and sl55 intake with a wrap kit. should be a heads up race, but i have never dragged on a track with lights so i might be my own worst enemy!!i would like to add i never expected the numbers i got. i would have been happy with 290. but every pull was over 300 rwhp on a stock motor. if the right mods are installed i believe 350 is very doable. mabye pushing 400 was wishful thinking! but i am convinced 350 to 375 with a super reliable motor is easily within reach. try needswings and see whats available for the 3.2 s/c engine. also eurocharged and let along with tvt
08-29-2009, 02:19 PM
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
to answer your questions my dyno was on a mustang dyno, temps inthe 70's humidity in the 50 to 60% range . 5 pulls from a low of 304 to a high of 323 hp. i would do a diff dyno but none in my area that i know of.
and lastly i hope to meet a crossfire member called goodgenes79 with his srt6 and do some 1/4 runs!! he has dual cai and c3 pulley with a wrap kit. i will have c3 and sl55 intake with a wrap kit. should be a heads up race, but i have never dragged on a track with lights so i might be my own worst enemy!!
i would like to add i never expected the numbers i got. i would have been happy with 290. but every pull was over 300 rwhp on a stock motor. if the right mods are installed i believe 350 is very doable. mabye pushing 400 was wishful thinking! but i am convinced 350 to 375 with a super reliable motor is easily within reach. try needswings and see whats available for the 3.2 s/c engine. also eurocharged and let along with tvt
and lastly i hope to meet a crossfire member called goodgenes79 with his srt6 and do some 1/4 runs!!
he has dual cai and c3 pulley with a wrap kit. i will have c3 and sl55 intake with a wrap kit. should be a heads up race, but i have never dragged on a track with lights so i might be my own worst enemy!!i would like to add i never expected the numbers i got. i would have been happy with 290. but every pull was over 300 rwhp on a stock motor. if the right mods are installed i believe 350 is very doable. mabye pushing 400 was wishful thinking! but i am convinced 350 to 375 with a super reliable motor is easily within reach. try needswings and see whats available for the 3.2 s/c engine. also eurocharged and let along with tvt
If you pulled 321 rwhp stock, what did you pull with the SL55 intake and C3P S/C pulley w/ belt wrap kit (sorry if I missed it, or misunderstood)?Look forward to hearing of your track times and experiences... and agree, 350-375 with a reliable motor is an attainable goal. Thanks again.
Last edited by c32AMG-DTM; 08-29-2009 at 02:21 PM.
08-29-2009, 04:29 PM
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: murfreesboro,tn
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 porsche 996 turbo
Appreciate the additional info on the dyno results. If you pulled 321 rwhp stock, what did you pull with the SL55 intake and C3P S/C pulley w/ belt wrap kit (sorry if I missed it, or misunderstood)?
Look forward to hearing of your track times and experiences... and agree, 350-375 with a reliable motor is an attainable goal. Thanks again.
If you pulled 321 rwhp stock, what did you pull with the SL55 intake and C3P S/C pulley w/ belt wrap kit (sorry if I missed it, or misunderstood)?Look forward to hearing of your track times and experiences... and agree, 350-375 with a reliable motor is an attainable goal. Thanks again.
my dyno sheet is on crossfireforum on the srt-6 page
