C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Fuel

Old Nov 14, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #1  
link146's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 125
Likes: 2
From: Marlton
'02 325 xi; '02 C32; '90 ZX; '08 CBR 6RR, '86 V45 Magna
Fuel

Just curious...anyone ever run simply regular 89 oct fuel in their C32?

The reason I ask is because I know that all modern cars are equipped with anti-knock sensors which will adjust for which ever fuel you are running. I used to run regular in my 02 325xi (which recommends that premium be run in the owner's manual) and noticed little-to-no difference in performance. The Bimmer did, however, get slightly less mpg on regular than premium (it was such a small difference that there was no question that the lower price of regular was a better deal).

Anyway, I know that the C32 is a much different beast than my old 3-series; re: timing, compression, hp, etc. However, like all other modern cars, I assume that the C32 is equipped with an anti-knock sensor. Thus, my hypothesis is that regular can be ran in a C32 without destroying the car. Whether the gas mileage or the performance turns to **** when run on regular, I don't know, I have never tried it.

Anyway, I just wanted to put the thought out there for ideas and comments. If you have an educated opinion please chime in, but if your answer is something to the tune of "just do it because the owner's manual says so" or "premium fuel is better" don't bother responding. I simply want a good reason, supported by factual/scientific logic, data and reasoning why I should not run regular fuel like I have done so many times in the past. Just for one more example, I rode and owned several sportbikes in my day and I recognize that their engines were virtually tuned for the track and I have even done after market tuning (intake, exhaust) and fuel mapping. I ran both premium, regular and race fuel in them. The difference between premium and regular is negligible at best. The difference between street fuel and racing fuel is noticiable, however, I don't know whether it improved my times or performance or whether I just enjoyed the intoxicating smell of it.

Thank you for your input on the topic.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
hooleyboy's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 3
From: Glendale Arizona
C55,SL55,C63
You are 100% right about the knock sensors detecting knock for fuel types. So yes just like 100oct will advance timing and add power. 87 or 89 will pull timing.

Not to go to far OT: the knock sensor is the reason running race fuel adds HP in our cars. It is a myth to think otherwise.

Now running a low grade fuel in a FI car could be asking for trouble. Even having time pulled out by the ECU might not be enough to stop detonation. I've never done it, so you better hope the knock sensor is working. I'd chalk this one up as risky.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #3  
ScottW911's Avatar
Super Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 4
From: Southern Cal
a C32 AMG & S-Works Tarmac
Why would you purchase a fine automobile like the C32 and cheap out on a few pennies with non-recommended (and potentially damaging) fuel.

Sell the MB. Get a Civic.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
TemjinX2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
lol...just ask c32used what 87 does to a c32.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #5  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by ScottW911
Why would you purchase a fine automobile like the C32 and cheap out on a few pennies with non-recommended (and potentially damaging) fuel.

Sell the MB. Get a Civic.
+1

i dont know why you (the OP) would want to put regular gas in it....seriously. why?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #6  
ML500K's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 3
From: Taipei, Taiwan
C32 '02
what about changing the fuel settings with the star diagnostics from 91 to 93? anyone try that? Is it worth doing?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
link146's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 125
Likes: 2
From: Marlton
'02 325 xi; '02 C32; '90 ZX; '08 CBR 6RR, '86 V45 Magna
I appreciate all of your opinions, however, no one answered the question. Whether I am cheap or not has nothing to do with it...I simply asked a question seeking an educated opinion in either end of the spectrum.

Hooleyboy: I understand your point, but like I state above, I have run reg fuel in cars/bikes that call for prem and have noticed little-to-no-difference.

Basically, my question can be boiled down to this: Will running lower octane fuel in my C32 hurt anything other than performance? If yes, why?

If you can supply a well reasoned answer to that question, please do. If you want to ask me why I bought a C32 and tell me to buy a Honda Civic don't waste your time and go read a MB owner's manual. If we did everything a MB owner's manual instructed...no one would ever touch their car and drive straight to the dealership for every problem, however de minimus it may be.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #8  
link146's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 125
Likes: 2
From: Marlton
'02 325 xi; '02 C32; '90 ZX; '08 CBR 6RR, '86 V45 Magna
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
lol...just ask c32used what 87 does to a c32.
C32used: what does 87 oct do to a C32?
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 08:09 PM
  #9  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by link146
I appreciate all of your opinions, however, no one answered the question. Whether I am cheap or not has nothing to do with it...I simply asked a question seeking an educated opinion in either end of the spectrum.

Hooleyboy: I understand your point, but like I state above, I have run reg fuel in cars/bikes that call for prem and have noticed little-to-no-difference.

Basically, my question can be boiled down to this: Will running lower octane fuel in my C32 hurt anything other than performance? If yes, why?

If you can supply a well reasoned answer to that question, please do. If you want to ask me why I bought a C32 and tell me to buy a Honda Civic don't waste your time and go read a MB owner's manual. If we did everything a MB owner's manual instructed...no one would ever touch their car and drive straight to the dealership for every problem, however de minimus it may be.
GO BUY A HONDA CIVIC
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 09:10 PM
  #10  
MRAMG1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 11
From: PA
S600, GL450, GLC 43
Originally Posted by link146
Basically, my question can be boiled down to this: Will running lower octane fuel in my C32 hurt anything other than performance? If yes, why?
Okay where to start

1. Blown head gaskets due to pre ignition/spark rattle which GREATLY increase combustion pressure
2. Burnt exhaust valves due to over heating from pre ignition
3. Cracked rings
4. You have to be kidding and why didn't you go buy a GEO

I quit
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #11  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Okay... lot of aggression on MBW these days for whatever reason. IMHO, you guys are being too tough on this one - it is an interesting question.

CA and AZ folks run regularly on 91 - some have speculated that they can get "crappy" 91 that's more like 89. If cars with intake, 185mm CP, tune, etc. can run "crap 91" without grenading the engine - I think it's likely that someone could run 89 (mid-grade) in a stock pullied and stock tuned C32 without adverse effects. The OP didn't ask about running 87 (regular) - but my curiosity has been piqued - what happened to c32used's car by running 87?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 10:35 PM
  #12  
TemjinX2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
it was a subtle joke. Basically last yr c32used posted a thread about how he was having problems with his engine.

We all thought there was something seriously wrong with his car. Until later in the thread he posted he put 87 gas into the car. Never i found it it was 89 gas, not 87.

Basically after he put premium back into the car, the car ran perfect again. He basically got flamed for a month about it...it was all in good fun. But you can probably find his thread about it.

Last edited by TemjinX2; Nov 18, 2009 at 10:45 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 10:49 PM
  #13  
TemjinX2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
To the op...you can try it out and let us know. Its 91 in ca because there emission additives that changes the octane rating to 91 from 93. California 91 is still higher then other states 89. There rating is still the same across all 50 states.

Its about a 10cent difference between 89 and 91. 14 gallons x .10 = $1.40?

you want to run your car below factory spec to save $1.40?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 11:00 PM
  #14  
Phil C55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Middle of IL in a corn field
2006 C55 AMG White/Ash
There are a bunch of guys on the Ducati forum that swear by lower grade fuels in even bikes like a 1098. I only used premium 92-93 octane in mine because that's what Ducati called for, same thing for the C55, it only gets premium. Some of them even claimed increase in performance.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #15  
TemjinX2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
you lose mpg and performance when you run lower grade fuel then the manfacturer recommends because the gas is igniting before its suppose to so the car retards the timing to compensate.

So any money you save on the lower grade gas becomes a wash since your losing mpg.

There's a huge thread on it on the w203 forum. You can check there...most of the common questions of premium vs regular has been answered.

generally speaking

low compression gas + high compression engine = BOOM!
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 12:35 AM
  #16  
gt4awd's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 1
2005 Pontiac GTO 6.0 LS2 - Blue
There's a big difference from running lower grade fuel in say my 2004 350z that says it requires premium. I'm sure it would be fine... However, the C32 is supercharged, and requires higher octane to achieve correct air fuel ratio. The manual states to stay off the throttle if you run lower octane, and to only do so if there is no option for higher octane fuel.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 06:46 AM
  #17  
MRAMG1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 11
From: PA
S600, GL450, GLC 43
Originally Posted by gt4awd
There's a big difference from running lower grade fuel in say my 2004 350z that says it requires premium. I'm sure it would be fine... However, the C32 is supercharged, and requires higher octane to achieve correct air fuel ratio.I am sorry my friend, but octane has NOTHING to due with A/F ratio The manual states to stay off the throttle if you run lower octane, and to only do so if there is no option for higher octane fuel.VERY true

Octane buy itself has nothing to do with A/F ration, what it does affect is the spark advance and detonation properties. The latter you do not want under ANY circumstance for my above reasons. I popped a head gasket on my supercharged stang do to some **** poor gas a few years back. My A/F guage showed nothing wrong, but the motor spark rattle hard, only once, and I was left with a milk shake in my oil

As far as performance increase or MPG, your car will ALWAYS get the BEST performance/mileage with the optimum octane for it. No more, no less is required. Run too much, and you will LOOSE both. Its simple physics guys. Believe it or not. The best octane you can run is the one that allows full timing without pre detonation and this will ALWAYS make the most power and give you the best mileage.

Translation, if your car has NO detonation on 91, using 93 or higher will only hurt both. Noiw tune it with more advance, and you WILL need more octane to suppress detonation
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #18  
MBH motorsports's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 93
From: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
Originally Posted by Phil C55
There are a bunch of guys on the Ducati forum that swear by lower grade fuels in even bikes like a 1098. I only used premium 92-93 octane in mine because that's what Ducati called for, same thing for the C55, it only gets premium. Some of them even claimed increase in performance.
To the ducati guys feel this is because the bike revs so high? Do they think with the high RPMs they simply can not burn all of the slower burning fuel at such high RPM's? So they use a lower grade fuel that burns crazy fast. This is very interesting to say the least. If I didnt fear detonation, this would mostlikey make sense to me.

I think diesal fuel burns real slow, Thats why (guessing) some diesal trucks redline at 4k because they cant burn all the fuel at any higher RPMs.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #19  
Phil C55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Middle of IL in a corn field
2006 C55 AMG White/Ash
Originally Posted by MBH motorsports
To the ducati guys feel this is because the bike revs so high? Do they think with the high RPMs they simply can not burn all of the slower burning fuel at such high RPM's? So they use a lower grade fuel that burns crazy fast. This is very interesting to say the least. If I didnt fear detonation, this would mostlikey make sense to me.

I think diesal fuel burns real slow, Thats why (guessing) some diesal trucks redline at 4k because they cant burn all the fuel at any higher RPMs.
Not sure what they are thinking, some just say the bike runs better. A 1098 is twin that has nearly 4" pistons, so you don't rev one past 10k rpm, but it is a high compression motor. 150 hp out of 1.1 liter is pretty healthy and so I would think it needs at least premium pump gas.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #20  
E55AMGFan's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
LS430
Any performance car especially boosted needs the highest grade available. 93+ and in Cali, the 91 water down stuff cuts it.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE