my s 2000 is faster and my c32 code3 380.500 nm,a im shame.
MBWorld Fanatic!
um....what?
if your s2000 is naturally aspirated and faster than your c32 with a code3, then you probably have a bad intercooler pump.
if your s2000 is naturally aspirated and faster than your c32 with a code3, then you probably have a bad intercooler pump.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
HUH??? Makes no sense to me??? I had a S 2000 Honda dude and it was no where near as quick nor fast as my C32 (except in the twisties at Joliet where it was a great car). Needed about another 100 HP in the S 2000 to make it competitive. Still, the S 2000 (now gone) is a great car and I loved every minute of it!!Originally Posted by merc4ever
my s 2000 is faster and my c32 code3 380.500 nm,a im shame.
Quote:
if your s2000 is naturally aspirated and faster than your c32 with a code3, then you probably have a bad intercooler pump.
oh no my pump is perfect just teh honda is to fast with the sos sc bump out 340 245 at wheelsOriginally Posted by jturkel
um....what?if your s2000 is naturally aspirated and faster than your c32 with a code3, then you probably have a bad intercooler pump.
Quote:
thats whats a im ment, you se, thats what i ment the s 2000 is a light weight carOriginally Posted by Newzchspy
HUH??? Makes no sense to me??? I had a S 2000 Honda dude and it was no where near as quick nor fast as my C32 (except in the twisties at Joliet where it was a great car). Needed about another 100 HP in the S 2000 to make it competitive. Still, the S 2000 (now gone) is a great car and I loved every minute of it!!
Quote:
thats why im in blower a bout 12- 13 psiOriginally Posted by Newzchspy
HUH??? Makes no sense to me??? I had a S 2000 Honda dude and it was no where near as quick nor fast as my C32 (except in the twisties at Joliet where it was a great car). Needed about another 100 HP in the S 2000 to make it competitive. Still, the S 2000 (now gone) is a great car and I loved every minute of it!!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
haha Originally Posted by kindafast
omgwtflol
i know, i wish i could understand his posts.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Explore
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
A 340RWHP S2000 would be quicker, yes, that's about a 12.8sec car given a good clutch dumping launch...
I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
Quote:
i know, i wish i could understand his posts.
you know isint that hard.i meen my s2000 with blower is faster an my cc32 with code 3 pulley intake resonator delete resorvoir seperation. love to her from you fellows,swedenOriginally Posted by jturkel
haha i know, i wish i could understand his posts.
Super Member
Hur går det .. det S2000 är mycket lättare, det kommer att bli snabbare. Hur mycket makt är C32 lägger ner?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
ok well i'm glad you like your s2000. it is a completely different car than the c32....i love how they look and hear they handle quite well, but they are utterly torqueless. i know Aho's buddy has one that is putting down upwards of 500whp IIRC...Originally Posted by merc4ever
you know isint that hard.i meen my s2000 with blower is faster an my cc32 with code 3 pulley intake resonator delete resorvoir seperation. love to her from you fellows,sweden
this thread just seems completely random.....just stating your s/c s2000 is faster. ok. cool i guess. enjoy your cars
Quote:
I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
thats little ca r is pretty fast when you suprchargit or turboit belive my word a have a c 32 and a im smoked.Originally Posted by alumar
A 340RWHP S2000 would be quicker, yes, that's about a 12.8sec car given a good clutch dumping launch...I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
Originally Posted by alumar
A 340RWHP S2000 would be quicker, yes, that's about a 12.8sec car given a good clutch dumping launch...I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
That's rare!! I'd love to see that, BUT mine was lightly modded and would never touch MY C32 or Kleemann in a straight line!!
Quote:
hörde jag lite svenskaOriginally Posted by alumar
Hur går det .. det S2000 är mycket lättare, det kommer att bli snabbare. Hur mycket makt är C32 lägger ner?
Quote:
well ther is a nou tape of ball game commin out the s2000 never gonna be at fst as c 32 at straight laine stock to stock but my s 2000 i,sint stock ainnt my c,32 either i am button 380 .500nm in my c32 and 360 250 in my s 2000 i have to say my s 2000 is faster at revs not lo ends.andreas from swedenOriginally Posted by Newzchspy
That's rare!! I'd love to see that, BUT mine was lightly modded and would never touch MY C32 or Kleemann in a straight line!!
Quote:
this thread just seems completely random.....just stating your s/c s2000 is faster. ok. cool i guess. enjoy your cars
well jurkel i have, im both and love them a dont now the word,to the comperd dome totoyly tefrence car.escuse me for my mad spellence.swedenOriginally Posted by jturkel
ok well i'm glad you like your s2000. it is a completely different car than the c32....i love how they look and hear they handle quite well, but they are utterly torqueless. i know Aho's buddy has one that is putting down upwards of 500whp IIRC...this thread just seems completely random.....just stating your s/c s2000 is faster. ok. cool i guess. enjoy your cars
Quote:
I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
alright a love the smol cars this is ma summer carOriginally Posted by alumar
A 340RWHP S2000 would be quicker, yes, that's about a 12.8sec car given a good clutch dumping launch...I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
Senior Member
This is my buddys S2k made 595whp @ 21psi
3rd to last dyno run, this one made 564whp
3rd to last dyno run, this one made 564whp
Super Moderator Alumni
Quote:
Huh? Every Swede I've met has told me that the school systems over there taught English from the start. Where you home schooled?Originally Posted by merc4ever
well jurkel i have, im both and love them a dont now the word,to the comperd dome totoyly tefrence car.escuse me for my mad spellence.sweden
And jturkel is right. This is a rather odd thread for this forum. Its like saying, "My mom can whoop your aunt in an arm wrestling foot race".
Oh, and the "jurkel" comment just makes me think you are putting us on with a false incapacity to communicate in English.
Quote:
I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
that a fast wanOriginally Posted by alumar
A 340RWHP S2000 would be quicker, yes, that's about a 12.8sec car given a good clutch dumping launch...I have a friend in Louisville that has a 355RWHP 286RWTQ ** Turbo, not Supercharged S2000 that hits about a 12.3-12.4 @ 112mph
Its a ball of a good time
Member
Quote:
honda boy jdm gibberish is mad tyte yo!Originally Posted by merc4ever
oh no my pump is perfect just teh honda is to fast with the sos sc bump out 340 245 at wheels
Quote:
And jturkel is right. This is a rather odd thread for this forum. Its like saying, "My mom can whoop your aunt in an arm wrestling foot race".
Oh, and the "jurkel" comment just makes me think you are putting us on with a false incapacity to communicate in English.
sure you right scott Originally Posted by ScottW911
Huh? Every Swede I've met has told me that the school systems over there taught English from the start. Where you home schooled?And jturkel is right. This is a rather odd thread for this forum. Its like saying, "My mom can whoop your aunt in an arm wrestling foot race".
Oh, and the "jurkel" comment just makes me think you are putting us on with a false incapacity to communicate in English.
MBWorld Fanatic!
i vote this thread be locked....This is a completely worthless thread. I can have a 500whp integra for less then 8k including the price of the car that would be faster then a s2k in the straights and twisties...wtf does that matter.
