Replaced pads with EBC yellow stuff

thanks,
Bry
Last edited by Autotechnica; Sep 12, 2011 at 01:53 PM.
2.When I ask fellow drivers opinions about EBC at a track day, they all look at me funny and ask why I would consider EBC at all?
thanks,
Bry
The stock pads would last maybe 14-16 laps before going to the floor, while the Redstuff I could run for a FULL 30 minute session. As far as the warm up, I never saw a differnece from cold to hot, but then again everyone drives differently on the track and street
2. A few years back almost all of the local guys near me would use EBC yellow and blues, note this is at BEaverun and Nelson Ledges. Some still do, some have moved on to even MORE aggressive pads. What track were you at, as I am guessing it was Mosport?
Sorry, But I still use and REALLY like EBC red for street/occasional track.
Low dust, low fade, low cost
Low dust
Better than stock performance, by far
No squealing, when bedded properly, aka follow directions.
If you do open track days, and do not mind some dust, yellows are a better choice. But they WILL dust and are NOT ceramic
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The stock pads would last maybe 14-16 laps before going to the floor, while the Redstuff I could run for a FULL 30 minute session. As far as the warm up, I never saw a differnece from cold to hot, but then again everyone drives differently on the track and street
2. A few years back almost all of the local guys near me would use EBC yellow and blues, note this is at BEaverun and Nelson Ledges. Some still do, some have moved on to even MORE aggressive pads. What track were you at, as I am guessing it was Mosport?
Sorry, But I still use and REALLY like EBC red for street/occasional track.
Low dust, low fade, low cost
Redstuff is more than adequate for the street, although better options exists for "other" cars. I would be more interested in a Porterfield vs. EBC comparison.
Last edited by Autotechnica; Sep 13, 2011 at 04:45 PM.
Redstuff is more than adequate for the street, although better options exists for "other" cars. I would be more interested in a Porterfield vs. EBC comparison.

Okay, it IS a very tight track for sure, and VERY little passing room. Which configuration did you run?
I always liked the whole track, but the back track was also very fun as well.
Is there still the huge rout in turn one on the back track?
Okay, back on brakes. Porterfield have a WILD following in the Porsche group, and I have seen them work well in LIGHT cars, aka under 3400lbs. So for a C32 they are not a bad choice, but pricey.
Hawks are okay, but tend to eat rotors.
I don't know if they make them for the C32 but EBC Blues are VERY aggressive, aka NOT for street use.


thanks,
Bry
either way, check out this brake test by Car and Driver.
http://blog.caranddriver.com/perform...c-yellowstuff/
The SCCA instructors that rode with me all and people I work with at Autox don't necessarily endorse late braking unless you are trying to pass, you are better off on the brakes slightly early to get the car set up and on the throttle as soon as possible.









