Does anyone have a dyno of a stock C55 after a resonator delete?
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Does anyone have a dyno of a stock C55 after a resonator delete?
I've got a resonator delete (sounds great and no droning at all) but I'm sure there were no power gains but I'm now curious if any power loss was caused?
Resonator deletes usually reduces backpressure but I think that only works in favor of a forced induced motor.
Any before/after dynos?
Resonator deletes usually reduces backpressure but I think that only works in favor of a forced induced motor.
Any before/after dynos?
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
It won't change anything, the stock C55 exhaust is very restrictive because of the primary cats. That's why Kleemann or MBH headers give such a great gain. From what I've seen C55s dyno 275-300 to the wheels, most are closer to 275 but there are a few factory freaks.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
How much of a gain are we talking about with Kleemann/MBH headers? I know with the Renntech headers they state 15+ hp and 20+ torque at the crank.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle, Warshington
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 C55, 2006 Ram 2500 MegaCab diesel, sold 2001 Dodge 2500 Cummins, sold 87 190e-16v, sold 97 e420
That is not their only choke point. The single Y at the differential has to be worse. All pipe sizing specs relate that to support 400 hp, you need a single 4" exhaust or dual 2 1/4" pipes.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
Renntech headers are only shorties if I remember correctly. Kleemann headers are supposed to be good for 50hp and I would guess the MBH headers a little more.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
When you say 50hp increase do you mean along with ECU and airbox right?
#7
message member named "MBH motorsports" (his actual name is Mike and used to have a highly modified supercharged C55) and ask him for specs/pricing. tell him i sent you
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
I've got a resonator delete (sounds great and no droning at all) but I'm sure there were no power gains but I'm now curious if any power loss was caused?
Resonator deletes usually reduces backpressure but I think that only works in favor of a forced induced motor.
Any before/after dynos?
Resonator deletes usually reduces backpressure but I think that only works in favor of a forced induced motor.
Any before/after dynos?
Last edited by wawy; 12-06-2012 at 07:29 AM.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Aston Martin V8 Vantage
305HP,316TQ. with K&N drop in fliters+resonator delete
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...u-flash-7.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...u-flash-7.html
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
305HP,316TQ. with K&N drop in fliters+resonator delete
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...u-flash-7.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...u-flash-7.html
Stock C55 with 20% drivetrain loss is 285 rwhp and 300 rwtp
So if I am getting this right, with your resonator delete and K&N filter you made 305 rwhp and 316 rwtq.
After adding the ECU you made an additional 15 rwhp and 30 rwtq increase without headers? So that would make flywheel horsepower about 420 and torque at 440?
What dyno did you run on?
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Aston Martin V8 Vantage
To put things into perspective:
Stock C55 with 20% drivetrain loss is 285 rwhp and 300 rwtp
So if I am getting this right, with your resonator delete and K&N filter you made 305 rwhp and 316 rwtq.
After adding the ECU you made an additional 15 rwhp and 30 rwtq increase without headers? So that would make flywheel horsepower about 420 and torque at 440?
What dyno did you run on?
Stock C55 with 20% drivetrain loss is 285 rwhp and 300 rwtp
So if I am getting this right, with your resonator delete and K&N filter you made 305 rwhp and 316 rwtq.
After adding the ECU you made an additional 15 rwhp and 30 rwtq increase without headers? So that would make flywheel horsepower about 420 and torque at 440?
What dyno did you run on?
not sure what dyno it was, check my sig. for the dyno runs. i did the same dyno on my E63. it was at dittos motors in daly city, CA.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
And the part that still has me puzzled is you had great gains without headers
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
All the other tuners didn't bother creating an exhaust for the C55 because gains were minimal. That's why you only see intakes/ECUs/headers for this car.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
The gains are huge with a complete exhaust. On my supercharged car, once I put on the Kleemann headers, high flow cats, and a full custom 2.5" exhaust back to the mufflers I gain 0.5 in the 1/4 mile.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
You might have a point because Dre's setup without any cats, Kleemann headers to 2.5" stainless duals w/ x-pipe, and stock AMG mufflers netted him 377rwhp on a Dynojet. However since he is N/A he only probably gained 15-20rwhp and the cost must have been extraordinary for custom exhaust system.
Last edited by Capn; 12-06-2012 at 06:29 PM.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
You might have a point because Dre's setup without any cats, Kleemann headers to 2.5" stainless duals w/ x-pipe, and stock AMG mufflers netted him 377rwhp on a Dynojet. However since he is N/A he only probably gained 15-20rwhp and the cost must have been extraordinary for custom exhaust system.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
Dre bought Alumar's used exhaust from his car when he went long tubes. I wanted it bad myself but I missed out, he got a great deal. I've got a good bit of cash into mine, but it's about the best it can be. There's about 30 hours of fab into it.
#19
Super Member
IMHO, the reason no full exhausts were developed was becaut the C55 has a production of only 1750 vehicles to the North American market. Assuming that what I've read about the US getting 40% of AMG production, that would mean a whopping 4375 worldwide. Given that most owners will not mod their cars it would be stupid for a company to invest much in product development. The mods that are available were developed for the engine, not the chassis.
My custom exhaust was a little over $900 iirc.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
Close, it was AMGSC...it's been a while, I had to think about it myself
IMHO, the reason no full exhausts were developed was becaut the C55 has a production of only 1750 vehicles to the North American market. Assuming that what I've read about the US getting 40% of AMG production, that would mean a whopping 4375 worldwide. Given that most owners will not mod their cars it would be stupid for a company to invest much in product development. The mods that are available were developed for the engine, not the chassis.
My custom exhaust was a little over $900 iirc.
IMHO, the reason no full exhausts were developed was becaut the C55 has a production of only 1750 vehicles to the North American market. Assuming that what I've read about the US getting 40% of AMG production, that would mean a whopping 4375 worldwide. Given that most owners will not mod their cars it would be stupid for a company to invest much in product development. The mods that are available were developed for the engine, not the chassis.
My custom exhaust was a little over $900 iirc.
The C was always the ******* child anyway. It never took off until the W204. That's why the CLK got all the cool factory options that the C could have easily had since it's the same car with two more doors. Plus, all the companies making performance parts for Benz focused on the E since it left the factory with a supercharger so it was easier to make faster.
#21
Senior Member
Just for the record,
4.600 C55´s were made in total between late 04 and early 07.
1.750 were shipped to North America, all sedans.
Maybe 1.750 were wagons...
4.600 C55´s were made in total between late 04 and early 07.
1.750 were shipped to North America, all sedans.
Maybe 1.750 were wagons...
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S.E. FLA.
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
05 ML-500 , 03 CLK5.5 AMG has left the Garage
Horse Power gain
Hello All:
I believe that there is not much to gain in a Horse power increase with a Res delete. Just maybe a noise incrase. The real Hing pin is the exhaust manifolds . Stock manifold outlet is a little over 1.5 ". The Klee Headers are 2.5 ". Somewhere Here are some answers ? https://mbworld.org/forums/clk55-amg...er-review.html. I'll find the dyno sheets & Pic
Cheers
_PTEngineering
I believe that there is not much to gain in a Horse power increase with a Res delete. Just maybe a noise incrase. The real Hing pin is the exhaust manifolds . Stock manifold outlet is a little over 1.5 ". The Klee Headers are 2.5 ". Somewhere Here are some answers ? https://mbworld.org/forums/clk55-amg...er-review.html. I'll find the dyno sheets & Pic
Cheers
_PTEngineering
Last edited by PTE; 12-08-2012 at 07:49 AM.
#23
Senior Member
There´s no hp-gain with a resonator delete!
The resonator takes away some drone and is a big straight
muffler.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
The resonator takes away some drone and is a big straight
muffler.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
[QUOTE=amgen;5460850]There´s no hp-gain with a resonator delete!
The resonator takes away some drone and is a big straight
muffler./QUOTE]
Funny enough I hear zero drone with the resonator delete.
The resonator takes away some drone and is a big straight
muffler./QUOTE]
Funny enough I hear zero drone with the resonator delete.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2016 Chevrolet SS, 2006 Cadillac STS-V
I have no drone with my exhaust now with the headers and 100-cell high flows. I had no drone even right after I put the headers on with no cats. Drone is all in the muffler(s).