Clk32..
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK63 Black Series
Clk32..
If MB had produced the a CLK32, with the same specs as the CLK55, but with the engine of the current C32, and costing about 10k more then the C32.. would you have gotten it instead of the C32?
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silicon valley
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Audi C7.5 S6
I picked the C32, because it was a small four door.
I picked the C32, because it was a small four door.
The E55 is too big.
The CLK55 only has two doors and the stupid motorized seat, for rear seat entry (long wait).
If it had not been for the rear seat access issue, I would have gotten the CLK55, the V8 sounds so much nicer.
The E55 is too big.
The CLK55 only has two doors and the stupid motorized seat, for rear seat entry (long wait).
If it had not been for the rear seat access issue, I would have gotten the CLK55, the V8 sounds so much nicer.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would pay the same amount of premium C32 - C320 = CLK32 - CLK320
Yeah, CLK is priced more than the C, but if the CLK32 gets the same amount of AMG-tization as a C32 would, then their premium over base should be the same...
Yeah, CLK is priced more than the C, but if the CLK32 gets the same amount of AMG-tization as a C32 would, then their premium over base should be the same...
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK63 Black Series
Originally posted by pokerFACE
I would pay the same amount of premium C32 - C320 = CLK32 - CLK320
Yeah, CLK is priced more than the C, but if the CLK32 gets the same amount of AMG-tization as a C32 would, then their premium over base should be the same...
I would pay the same amount of premium C32 - C320 = CLK32 - CLK320
Yeah, CLK is priced more than the C, but if the CLK32 gets the same amount of AMG-tization as a C32 would, then their premium over base should be the same...
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so what would the price diff between clk500 and a theoretical clk32 then? if the clk32 prices too close to it then it may be a problem....
on the other hand, with a C55 available.. hmm... then a C500 is possible, wouldn't it?
on the other hand, with a C55 available.. hmm... then a C500 is possible, wouldn't it?
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK63 Black Series
Originally posted by pokerFACE
so what would the price diff between clk500 and a theoretical clk32 then? if the clk32 prices too close to it then it may be a problem....
on the other hand, with a C55 available.. hmm... then a C500 is possible, wouldn't it?
so what would the price diff between clk500 and a theoretical clk32 then? if the clk32 prices too close to it then it may be a problem....
on the other hand, with a C55 available.. hmm... then a C500 is possible, wouldn't it?
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK63 Black Series
Originally posted by pokerFACE
on the other hand, with a C55 available.. hmm... then a C500 is possible, wouldn't it?
on the other hand, with a C55 available.. hmm... then a C500 is possible, wouldn't it?
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 CLK320
Re: Clk32..
Originally posted by AMG BRED
If MB had produced the a CLK32, with the same specs as the CLK55, but with the engine of the current C32, and costing about 10k more then the C32.. would you have gotten it instead of the C32?
If MB had produced the a CLK32, with the same specs as the CLK55, but with the engine of the current C32, and costing about 10k more then the C32.. would you have gotten it instead of the C32?
A s/c v6 CLK (w208) would probably have been lighter than the 5.5 v8 version turned out and probably would have pretty good performance. Especially with the 3.07 differential gearing the v6 has.
As it was, there was nearly 300# differance of the 3.2 vs the 5.5 model in the w208's.
The w209's got heavier with the larger body plus the extra reinforcements that going pillarless required to keep the body stiff enough.
#9
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG
Re: I picked the C32, because it was a small four door.
Originally posted by m444
I picked the C32, because it was a small four door.
The E55 is too big.
The CLK55 only has two doors and the stupid motorized seat, for rear seat entry (long wait).
If it had not been for the rear seat access issue, I would have gotten the CLK55, the V8 sounds so much nicer.
I picked the C32, because it was a small four door.
The E55 is too big.
The CLK55 only has two doors and the stupid motorized seat, for rear seat entry (long wait).
If it had not been for the rear seat access issue, I would have gotten the CLK55, the V8 sounds so much nicer.