Interest in Aftermarket parts?
With the C43 most of our parts will swap right over so the R&D is 90% finished, but the C36 is a whole new ball game.
We should finally be opening up a shop to do some testing in after cleaning the property all summer and if the interest is there, we would like to get our hands on one of these cars and see what we can do.
I think a N/A 400 HP C43 for a decent price would sound pretty good.
Let me know what you think and we'll go from there.
Anthony




As for V6 hp at 300, I assume your referring to crank hp.
Why don't you modify your M112 headers to fit the W208 chassis, you would be the only company in the market place offering these and I would be be very interested.

An up graded intake that really works, some headers, and maybe some exhaust tweaks. Not sure how that is going to get 400 crank hp, but i'd be game to try. Heck i'd be happy with 350-360 hp crank na. The car is already fast, it just needs a litte extra oomph to make it over the top of being competative again with the newer crop of V8 euro cars.
Turbo/SC only viable option for anything 350HP+ on any W202 period. stick to Chrysler crossfires.
Turbo/SC only viable option for anything 350HP+ on any W202 period. stick to Chrysler crossfires.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
There are some things that could be done to a NA m113 (head work, headers, cams, bottom end stuff), but you won't end up w/ 100 extra ponies. Take a look at what some of the guys on the w211 E55 forum have been doing....of course everything there involves a supercharger, but many of the mechanical mods they are doing are relevant to all motors. Then take a look at how much $$$ they are shelling out. It's crazy, maybe not for an E55, but for a 10 yr old w202 it is.
Last edited by FLYNAVY; Jul 21, 2008 at 04:15 AM.
The V8 kits include a dc to dc inverter to up the voltage on the fuel pump to increase fuel flow. Since the pump is gear driven, upping the voltage increases the fuel volume.
Make you you get all of that hardware as well, as the inverter kit alone runs $800 and you won't have enough fuel pressure without it.
ECU remapping is not required, but you should consider spending the money and having it done.
or run an adjustable "amplifier" on your fuel pump and step-up the voltage exactly the amount you want (for about $350 new) and set it dependent on another variable.
i have spent a lot of effort and time looking into tuning options- talking on the phone with people who have the capabilities etc. and i'm just not convinced that any of them really know what they are doing. I was so excited when i first found a list of numbers (nationally) for tuning places with the capabilities, but as i spoke with more and more of them i realized i trusted myself to street tune my car with fuel pressure and maf scaling more than i trusted any of those people to get a tune right (even with multiple trips back and forth to the dyno mailing them the ecu back and forth etc. etc.)
that said- i definitely want to get a proper ecu tune for my car if possible, lol.
currently i'm 10.5-10.9 in 1st and 2nd and 12.6-12.9 afr in 3rd and 4th at wot and without going into the ecu will never be able to lean out first and 2nd. ecu tuning would also put me in a better situation for my nitrous plans.
The V8 kits include a dc to dc inverter to up the voltage on the fuel pump to increase fuel flow. Since the pump is gear driven, upping the voltage increases the fuel volume.
Make you you get all of that hardware as well, as the inverter kit alone runs $800 and you won't have enough fuel pressure without it.
ECU remapping is not required, but you should consider spending the money and having it done.
As for the ECU, I solved the tuning problem by integrating a Unichip piggy back ecu, so now I can control timing and fuel, but I am hitting 100% duty on the injectors, which I suspect is a fuel delivery problem. So I will be installing a CLK55 fuel pump on my car, which flows more than the stock clk320 pump.
Last edited by 2PHAST; Jul 21, 2008 at 04:43 PM.
you won't even need that "044" pump as it is overkill for this unless you modify the car a lot more than just bolting this on. The "982" pump which flows quite a bit less supports my car running at around 95 psi of fuel pressure too.
you won't even need that "044" pump as it is overkill for this unless you modify the car a lot more than just bolting this on. The "982" pump which flows quite a bit less supports my car running at around 95 psi of fuel pressure too.
the "044" bosch pump is larger than he will need to go with a 4.3 equipped with the Kleemann SC
when i said "this" in that post i was referring to the SC
so how did you get the piggyback to work?
With just an intake, ECU tune, and larger injectors we consistently get 260 HP+ out of the 3.2L, which has a starting point of 215 HP. That's a 20% increase.
If the 4.3L is choked in the same ways as its v6 cousin then I don't see why a lot more power isn't possible. Just because it hasn't been done doesn't mean it can't be.
Look at what LET and VRP are doing with SC motors. I'm sure no one thought things like that could happen. If it wasn't from the big German tuners it must be impossible.
We'll do a quick build up and see the reaction we get.
If we can get 350 HP to the crank for less then 2K would you be interested?
However part of the skeptecism comes from the fact that the car is already tweaked for 27 extra hp from the factory over a stadard 4.3L engine.
With just an intake, ECU tune, and larger injectors we consistently get 260 HP+ out of the 3.2L, which has a starting point of 215 HP. That's a 20% increase.
If the 4.3L is choked in the same ways as its v6 cousin then I don't see why a lot more power isn't possible. Just because it hasn't been done doesn't mean it can't be.
Look at what LET and VRP are doing with SC motors. I'm sure no one thought things like that could happen. If it wasn't from the big German tuners it must be impossible.
We'll do a quick build up and see the reaction we get.
If we can get 350 HP to the crank for less then 2K would you be interested?
Last edited by FLYNAVY; Jul 21, 2008 at 11:37 PM.

build something that works and i'll buy it- but you will have to show real gains with independent testing (which i could also handle for you to some degree) as well as good power numbers for the $ before anyone will take your claims seriously.
Flynavy is correct, just b/c its easy to make one engine make alot of HP doesn't mean its easier to do it on another. S50/52/54 engines are very rare exception. there aren't many 3.0/3.2L cars that you can extract an extra 60HP NA (25% increase) from a starting base of 240 then you are foolishishly optimistic. Those family of engines are a rare exception. C43 is not in that family. C36 can make roughly 50HP but only b/c it has a .4-.6 displacement advantage on the MB M5xx family engines.
50HP for $3000 is realistic estimate and many of the mods are already out there (crank pulley, headers, software, etc etc). I would definitely NOT recommend injectors and more importantly they are not necessary, the stock injectors in both the 36 and 43 are more than enough to cope for incoming extra air & etc (high capacity injectors running @ high pressures). Most importantly in a climate of every increasing fuel prices the LAST mod you should be doing is fuel injectors they will destroy fuel efficiency and for very little gain.
not trying to rain anyones parade but just giving a dose of reality. 100HP will not happen NA on any realistic budget (less than $10k in work), might as well just drop in 5.5L NA as mentioned for alot less, or SC.
What needs to be done, has been done already, its just a matter of people spending the $$ to get it done, as simple as that.
Last edited by Dr. C36; Jul 22, 2008 at 01:15 AM.



