99 C43 with 41k on it's way!!!!!!!!!!





Trending Topics

The CLK55 is of a lesser build quality then the W202 C43.
The C43 is more of a "landmark" AMG vehicle as it was the first V8 in the small chassis.
Future value of C43 will increase, CLK55 decrease.....
The Best of Mercedes & AMG





If the W202 C55 ever sold in the US there would be no W210 E55 and perhaps no CLK55,which for the CLK55 thank God was not the case.
The CLK body is now going into extinction as an E-class coupe
but MB will ALWAYS have the C-Class .
Last edited by ProjectC55; Nov 15, 2008 at 06:46 PM.

A quick search around the country shows 5 all priced under $11.000 the lowest with 80k miles.The least cost at $7800. For the extra 5g 55NA swap this one makes sense
.Not knowing market prices is the single biggest factor in the quick drop of these models.Price them right,buy them right.Value is retained.
$8900
1999 air seats ,hids,custom 17's
This one tempts me

1998 C43 $7000 obo
Last edited by ohlord; Nov 15, 2008 at 10:48 PM.
you cant judge the car by that
Ive seen so many good deals on these cars but all on east coast
so cheap with rly low miles but guess what
rust my friend
if u find one under 80k for under 10k here on wc, consider your self rly lucky
Not knocking the CLK 55, just that it's not as collectable as the C43.
Performance isn't the only factor in buying and holding a low mileage example of a low production volume vehicle.
A CLK55 is faster then a 6.0L AMG 124 Hammer...but I know which I would prefer owning and be willing to pay a premium for...
The CLK fell short as a coupe because it wasn't pillarless....
Mercedes corrected this design deficiency in the next generation.
The C208 syle was not a high point in Merc design and failed to follow the head turning design of the C124.
Mercedes Enthusiast Magazine just did an article on the C208 with primary emphasis on its affordability.
A museum piece ,yes,but a 41k car is not a garage queen,will never be one,and the value or price will keep slipping.
A museum piece ,yes,but a 41k car is not a garage queen,will never be one,and the value or price will keep slipping.

Collectable vehicles do not begin to achieve appreciating value in the first ten years +/- .
The C43 is still a "new" car, but one with low production numbers.
Key to making money on collectable vehicles is to have foresight and buy at a bottom.
"Buy low, sell high" is how you make money in any investable asset !
Case in point... would you have thought a 1971 280SL W113 that was worth less then $10K in 1981 would now be valued at $50K-70K for a 2+ condition vehicle ?
Look at the 300SL market...when they were ten years old they were at $4K.
Current market forty years later they are at 70 to 100 times the ten year price.
I purchased a 1966 Aston Martin DB6 Vantage ( DB6/2447/R ) early in 1983 for $12K. Invested about $25K over a sixteen year period. Sold it in 1997 for $95K. Enjoyed it, showed and raced it, but kept it as pristine as possible.
I do however regret selling a 1964 lightweight Dodge max performance hemi, one of fifty made, in 1975 for $3500...no market then for race cars...now it would fetch close to 150K-$200K at auction.
I remember a story the late Bob Grossman told me.
Grossman owned and drove more then one 1962 Ferrari GTO under Luigi Chinetti and NART.
He sold his GTO's for $6500 ten years later...they then reached a value of over $7M in the late eighties.
Low production Mercs such as C36 and C43 AMG's, C124's and A124's are going to be more then double their current low value within the next ten years.
Only to look at Europe, U.K. and Japan for values on these models which have already increased !
Last edited by RBYCC; Nov 16, 2008 at 09:11 AM.
In 2005 when I sold my 57 Belair convertible that I had bought in 67 for $600 in mint condition,That was buy low sell high.
I could be wrong.Let's see how low the market goes and if in 10 years there are buyers that dreamed of always having a C43 will pony up the cash.




