98 better than 99 C43?
03-31-2011, 11:00 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
22 X3, 21 330e, 97 M3, 97 C36 (sold), but on the hunt for a clean, low-mile C43!
98 better than 99 C43?
So I was at the recent Mercedes March Madness event and spoke to a long-time owner of a 99 C43. He mentioned that 99s were (more?) prone to transmission failure than 98s. Then I researched some old threads on here and sure enough found similar statements...something about bad bearings in the 99 trannies?
So what's the real scoop? Why would MB have changed (esp for the worse) the tranny in the C43 from one year to the next? Doesn't quality normally improve with each model year?
So what's the real scoop? Why would MB have changed (esp for the worse) the tranny in the C43 from one year to the next? Doesn't quality normally improve with each model year?
03-31-2011, 02:00 PM
#2
So I was at the recent Mercedes March Madness event and spoke to a long-time owner of a 99 C43. He mentioned that 99s were (more?) prone to transmission failure than 98s. Then I researched some old threads on here and sure enough found similar statements...something about bad bearings in the 99 trannies?
So what's the real scoop? Why would MB have changed (esp for the worse) the tranny in the C43 from one year to the next? Doesn't quality normally improve with each model year?
So what's the real scoop? Why would MB have changed (esp for the worse) the tranny in the C43 from one year to the next? Doesn't quality normally improve with each model year?
no I don't know why they differ between years, that's strange if 98 is better?
mine is built 98 as a 99 and I'm not happy with my car's over all quality
Last edited by KJI3jflarryfe93; 03-31-2011 at 02:43 PM.
03-31-2011, 04:48 PM
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Land of mountains, cheese, chocolate and watches
Posts: 5,647
Received 251 Likes
on
212 Posts
12' W204 C63 AMG coupe "T-Rex", 12' W451 Smart Fortwo Pulse (99' W202 C43 AMG sold)
Mine is an April 99 production model and I have NO complaints apart from some rust in the usual places for a W202. My 98' C240 has NO rust whatsoever but that is because I cherish and wash the underside regularly (8 years ownership now)
03-31-2011, 06:57 PM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
22 X3, 21 330e, 97 M3, 97 C36 (sold), but on the hunt for a clean, low-mile C43!
Great, so now that I've heard from our two Europe-based forum members, any local guys got any feedback?~ 
03-31-2011, 10:29 PM
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fallon, NV
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
BMW and Mercedes
I never had any trans problems with my '99, but then again, when I got home to my house right after it was totalled in an accident (and shortly after having been out of town for 3 weeks with the car parked in my garage), I noticed an ominous pool (no exaggeration) of trans fluid where the car had been. No idea how much longer things would have lasted with that kind of a leak, but I'm guessing it was a seal vice a true mechanical problem with the trans itself.
04-01-2011, 08:31 PM
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1999 C43 AMG
I've got a 99' and the first time I put it in the shop because I thought I had a transmission problem at 15,000 miles the MB service manager laughed at me and said it was my rear tires were bald. I told him I didn't have many miles on them and he told me these continentals are very soft and wear quickly. The second time I took it in was because of the MAF sensor, which this one scared me but it only cost me $8oo some odd dollars. Other than this my transmission is great, but I keep it in the garage and waiting for my wife to learn to drive so she will have a safe car to drive.
Trending Topics
04-04-2011, 01:34 PM
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
I've got a 99' and the first time I put it in the shop because I thought I had a transmission problem at 15,000 miles the MB service manager laughed at me and said it was my rear tires were bald. I told him I didn't have many miles on them and he told me these continentals are very soft and wear quickly. The second time I took it in was because of the MAF sensor, which this one scared me but it only cost me $8oo some odd dollars. Other than this my transmission is great, but I keep it in the garage and waiting for my wife to learn to drive so she will have a safe car to drive.
04-04-2011, 07:42 PM
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1999 C43 AMG
I wish I was, I picked up a MAF sensor at Autozone and and put it in myself and 29 days later it was throwing 3 codes including the same MAF sensor code. I then took it to the dealership and they told me it was the MAF so I had them install a new one and took the POS that Autozone sold me and got my money back. I know it was expensive but I just wanted the thing fixed.
04-05-2011, 03:43 AM
#16
I wish I was, I picked up a MAF sensor at Autozone and and put it in myself and 29 days later it was throwing 3 codes including the same MAF sensor code. I then took it to the dealership and they told me it was the MAF so I had them install a new one and took the POS that Autozone sold me and got my money back. I know it was expensive but I just wanted the thing fixed.
04-05-2011, 07:52 PM
#17
Member
04-06-2011, 09:02 AM
#18
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-06-2011, 04:17 PM
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Land of mountains, cheese, chocolate and watches
Posts: 5,647
Received 251 Likes
on
212 Posts
12' W204 C63 AMG coupe "T-Rex", 12' W451 Smart Fortwo Pulse (99' W202 C43 AMG sold)
? He was on practically every thread....
04-06-2011, 04:57 PM
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
22 X3, 21 330e, 97 M3, 97 C36 (sold), but on the hunt for a clean, low-mile C43!
