w210 motor mounts
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1998 s320, 1995 e320 cabriolet, 1995 c36, 1988 230ce 5 speed, 2004 CL55 AMG
w210 motor mounts
this may be a total newb question but does the year matter when choosing the w210 mounts for a 98 c43?
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1967 Morris Cooper "S", 1983 911SC, 1997 Toyota Tacoma, 1999 HD FXSTB, 1998 C43
Why would you use them?
The W202 mounts are relatively cheap - why would you use the W210 mounts, am I missing something?
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1998 s320, 1995 e320 cabriolet, 1995 c36, 1988 230ce 5 speed, 2004 CL55 AMG
I think I read somewhere on here that the w210 are better/more durable than the w202? Not sure where but is there any truth to this?
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
If I am not mistaken I believe this is in reference to the E55 mounts, not just any old W210 mounts as there is a 3.2 and 4.3 that goes in the W210 as well and I can't imagine the 3.2 or the 4.3 mounts are any stouter than the C43's...
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego/Escondido, CA
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
1996 Mercedes C36 AMG
bushings from the w210 are better if i'm not mistaken, somebody correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't they solid while the w202's are hollow, or something along those lines?
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynocomped C43K, 08 X5
I think the w210 e class model shares same motor mounts. I dont know why its better than our mounts. I think they both use hydraulic fluid in the mounts. Prices are about the same as well.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
I posted about this topic in the stickies '55' swap thread. There are different part numbers for the C43 vs the E55 engine mounts. Anecdotal evidence is that they are 'better' whatever that means. I intend to buy a pair of 55 spec mounts for my swap. I do hope that the external dimensions are the same.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1967 Morris Cooper "S", 1983 911SC, 1997 Toyota Tacoma, 1999 HD FXSTB, 1998 C43
Give us the 411
I posted about this topic in the stickies '55' swap thread. There are different part numbers for the C43 vs the E55 engine mounts. Anecdotal evidence is that they are 'better' whatever that means. I intend to buy a pair of 55 spec mounts for my swap. I do hope that the external dimensions are the same.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynocomped C43K, 08 X5
I've already installed e55 lamfoerder motor mounts and to tell you the truth... I donno what make these w210 mounts better than c43's motor mounts. I mean I couldn't tell the difference
Maybe they last longer with no fluid leak. Its not like urethane motor mounts that you can feel the difference right away. I wish someone makes urethane motormounts+tranny mounts for our cars... sigh....
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#14
#16
Maybe non AMG cars have hydraulic moron mounts?
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynocomped C43K, 08 X5