C36 AMG, C43 AMG (W202) 1995 - 2000

w210 motor mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-20-2011, 03:50 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
pfleger81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 s320, 1995 e320 cabriolet, 1995 c36, 1988 230ce 5 speed, 2004 CL55 AMG
w210 motor mounts

this may be a total newb question but does the year matter when choosing the w210 mounts for a 98 c43?
Old 04-20-2011, 08:36 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StapleGun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1967 Morris Cooper "S", 1983 911SC, 1997 Toyota Tacoma, 1999 HD FXSTB, 1998 C43
Why would you use them?

The W202 mounts are relatively cheap - why would you use the W210 mounts, am I missing something?
Old 04-20-2011, 11:36 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
pfleger81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 s320, 1995 e320 cabriolet, 1995 c36, 1988 230ce 5 speed, 2004 CL55 AMG
I think I read somewhere on here that the w210 are better/more durable than the w202? Not sure where but is there any truth to this?
Old 04-21-2011, 11:14 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
503C43 ////AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 4,433
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
1999 C43, 2008 P30 E63, 2014 SQ5, 2024 Model Y Performance
Originally Posted by pfleger81
I think I read somewhere on here that the w210 are better/more durable than the w202? Not sure where but is there any truth to this?
If I am not mistaken I believe this is in reference to the E55 mounts, not just any old W210 mounts as there is a 3.2 and 4.3 that goes in the W210 as well and I can't imagine the 3.2 or the 4.3 mounts are any stouter than the C43's...
Old 04-21-2011, 11:44 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
pfleger81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 s320, 1995 e320 cabriolet, 1995 c36, 1988 230ce 5 speed, 2004 CL55 AMG
Yup that rings a bell. So e55 mounts better than c43?
Old 04-22-2011, 01:14 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
503C43 ////AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 4,433
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
1999 C43, 2008 P30 E63, 2014 SQ5, 2024 Model Y Performance
Originally Posted by pfleger81
Yup that rings a bell. So e55 mounts better than c43?
I have heard that before but I do not know for sure...
Old 04-22-2011, 01:35 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Jasssc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego/Escondido, CA
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
1996 Mercedes C36 AMG
bushings from the w210 are better if i'm not mistaken, somebody correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't they solid while the w202's are hollow, or something along those lines?
Old 04-22-2011, 04:33 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Motorsport3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dynocomped C43K, 08 X5
I think the w210 e class model shares same motor mounts. I dont know why its better than our mounts. I think they both use hydraulic fluid in the mounts. Prices are about the same as well.
Old 04-22-2011, 06:08 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
hoontastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99 c43 / 99 ml430
its the same engine with a different bore.. so likely the same mounts
Old 04-22-2011, 11:14 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Saaboteur's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,846
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
eclectic assortment of cars
I posted about this topic in the stickies '55' swap thread. There are different part numbers for the C43 vs the E55 engine mounts. Anecdotal evidence is that they are 'better' whatever that means. I intend to buy a pair of 55 spec mounts for my swap. I do hope that the external dimensions are the same.
Old 04-22-2011, 11:38 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StapleGun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1967 Morris Cooper "S", 1983 911SC, 1997 Toyota Tacoma, 1999 HD FXSTB, 1998 C43
Give us the 411

Originally Posted by Saaboteur
I posted about this topic in the stickies '55' swap thread. There are different part numbers for the C43 vs the E55 engine mounts. Anecdotal evidence is that they are 'better' whatever that means. I intend to buy a pair of 55 spec mounts for my swap. I do hope that the external dimensions are the same.
Let us know if they are...we'd all like to know
Old 04-23-2011, 02:54 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Motorsport3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dynocomped C43K, 08 X5
I've already installed e55 lamfoerder motor mounts and to tell you the truth... I donno what make these w210 mounts better than c43's motor mounts. I mean I couldn't tell the difference Maybe they last longer with no fluid leak. Its not like urethane motor mounts that you can feel the difference right away. I wish someone makes urethane motormounts+tranny mounts for our cars... sigh....
Old 04-23-2011, 06:09 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
popey24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C43 AMG 5.5 - 396.4HP
Simply don't use the hydraulic ones.
Old 04-23-2011, 06:17 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
KJI3jflarryfe93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 0
Received 36 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by popey24
Simply don't use the hydraulic ones.
aren't they all hydraulic motor mounts?
what do you then recommend?
Lemfoerder is the best when it comes to aftermarket parts
Old 04-24-2011, 10:10 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
popey24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C43 AMG 5.5 - 396.4HP
There are hydraulic ones or metall/rubber available. I used the metal/rubber one.
Old 04-24-2011, 12:17 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
KJI3jflarryfe93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 0
Received 36 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by popey24
There are hydraulic ones or metall/rubber available. I used the metal/rubber one.
If I go to the stealership with an E55 AMG VIN # (chassi number) am I going to get hydraulic rubbers or metal/rubber motor mounts, these cars must have the best engine mounts installed from factory?

Maybe non AMG cars have hydraulic moron mounts?
Old 04-24-2011, 10:15 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Motorsport3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dynocomped C43K, 08 X5
Originally Posted by popey24
There are hydraulic ones or metall/rubber available. I used the metal/rubber one.
Where can I get those non hydraulic one?? stealer??
I really one them!! I may get some engine vibration but I rather have more solid feel.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: w210 motor mounts



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.