Different Crank Pulley #s




anyone knows why the C43 & E55 & E55K has a different part #s of the Crank Pulley....??
C43: "112 035 13 00" & optional with "14 00"
E55: "113 030 00 03"
E55K: "113 030 01 03"
* is the different #s related to the less weight or bigger size in dia.......??
ZAYED,,




provides a Crank Pulley for all M113 V8 Engines, they not mentioned if there are any kind of difference between them.....!?>!?
ZAYED,,






from Evosport, but i don’t know with whom he contact with, i well ask that shop within 2 days and see.........
ZAYED,,
Trending Topics

How long have you had it? What kind of gains did you see?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I've blown and rebuilt at least 4 P-car engines while experimenting with what I now consider to be stupid HP tricks. Those expensive lessons have led me to the jaded position that I'm currently in. Regarding the damper, it appears I can make one of two assumptions.
- Either the powertrain engineers at MB are wrong, and any 113 damper would work.
- Or the powertrain engineers have properly tested the parts, correctly overridden the accountants and said that despite the manufacturing, stocking, and all the other related costs, three different parts must be made.




system could gains 4-7 hp, less risky, under "$250-$280", you can do it your self easily, Pulley can gives you roughly 12hp, "$500-$700",
labor with NO warranty around "$150", more risky,,> many people could not have that knowledge to involve with a heart of Engine balancing,
just need some hps without thinking,, i don’t have any issue with Pulley mod., but in my opinion its not deserve to go with something even it
may gives you 1% headache, we may have some other ways to free hps with relaxing minds.........
ZAYED,,
Last edited by cm60k; Nov 6, 2011 at 05:24 AM.
I WOUND'T be fitting a balancer of a different harmonic frequency, MB doesn't redesign parts without a good reason.




+1.......
ZAYED,,








with you, many many horror stories about pulleys, that’s why i removed it after only 2 weeks used.......
ZAYED,,
Last edited by cm60k; Nov 20, 2011 at 05:45 PM.
Get it wrong and the crank will become over stressed at certain RPM's and fail prematurely.
MB know what they are doing which is why crank pulleys and the integrated harmonic dampers are frequently not interchangable between engines.
Further it's certainly NOT good engineering practice to have a 'one size fits all' approach like certain 'performance pulley' makers offer.

Get it wrong and the crank will become over stressed at certain RPM's and fail prematurely.
MB know what they are doing which is why crank pulleys and the integrated harmonic dampers are frequently not interchangable between engines.
Further it's certainly NOT good engineering practice to have a 'one size fits all' approach like certain 'performance pulley' makers offer.




I have a few questions regarding the crank pulleys. My car has the M112 E26 engine and I have read somewhere on the forum that somebody used to make aluminum crank pulleys for the 320 models. What sort of gains would you realistically expect from using a much lighter crank pulley then the cast steel one? (not sure if it's cast steel)
I know somebody who has been working with metal all his life and I'm confident he could make me an aluminum crank shaft pulley.
My questions would be
-Should I even waste my time with thinking about something like this?
-Is any special "machining" or something required?
-If he fully copies the one that I have on the car right now and he makes one out of aluminum exactly the same, would that work?




I would not even think about this mod. Harmonic balancers serve a very specific purpose. Others have had good experiences, some of us don't trust them at all.
A member here was building a supercharged C55 and his lightweight AMS crank pulley came apart sitting in traffic and shredded the front of his engine. He abandoned the project.



>>
>>
>>
