Mr. AMG reviews the C43
This has got to be the most properly objective C43 review I have seen to date. Also, major kudos and credibility to the reviewer, given that he probably owns more AMG vehicles than any current reviewer or nay sayer of the C43. That Green Hell GT doe
Kudos to Rokenr. Instead of banging on for half the time debating if this car deserves the badge or not, he actually gave us a proper review. And like Silver Surfer said, this is coming from a guy who owns more AMGs than anyone I know atleast.
Last edited by munis; Sep 3, 2017 at 07:53 AM.
This has got to be the most properly objective C43 review I have seen to date. Also, major kudos and credibility to the reviewer, given that he probably owns more AMG vehicles than any current reviewer or nay sayer of the C43. That Green Hell GT doe

Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
1) the race seemed more like a 1/8 mile drag race, not a 1/4 mile. The 63's would've wiped the floor with the 43 if it was a 1/4 mile.
2) they raced in wet-ish conditions. Obviously these conditions aren't ideal for anyone, but it's even worse for the RWD cars (duh).
3) based on the video, I don't think the 63's used launch control. I'm assuming this was to try and minimize wheel spin, and level the playing field for the 43?
Lesson to be learned here? Never roll race a 63
1) the race seemed more like a 1/8 mile drag race, not a 1/4 mile. The 63's would've wiped the floor with the 43 if it was a 1/4 mile.
2) they raced in wet-ish conditions. Obviously these conditions aren't ideal for anyone, but it's even worse for the RWD cars (duh).
3) based on the video, I don't think the 63's used launch control. I'm assuming this was to try and minimize wheel spin, and level the playing field for the 43?
Lesson to be learned here? Never roll race a 63

911 around 3 seconds or less 0-60 depending on year
C43 around 4.0 or 4.1. C&D says 4.1
911 around 3 seconds or less 0-60 depending on year
C43 around 4.0 or 4.1. C&D says 4.1
There's no realm on earth where a c43 will ever "beat" a 911, let alone a turbo. I think you were just trolled mate.
There's no realm on earth where a c43 will ever "beat" a 911, let alone a turbo. I think you were just trolled mate.
My neighbour has some timing gear as he is a SERIOUS racing nut and sometimes rents a whole track with his buddies and their exotics. I have been 4.1 off his timer. Consistently in the 4.3's
I think any two cars with a second difference can go either way 1/10 times.
If you haven't tried it - run with traction / esc all the way off and do a brake stand start. If you have dry pavement you can do pretty well.
There's no realm on earth where a c43 will ever "beat" a 911, let alone a turbo. I think you were just trolled mate.
PS: My car is bone stock.








