C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C63 or new Skyline GTR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-24-2007, 11:10 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vcruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2013 G63 AMG
at the end of the day, its still a mercedes vs a nissan.
go for the c63. leave the skyline for the ricers
Old 10-24-2007, 11:29 AM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by Jspeed
Yeah, it weighs the same as a C63 but laps the Nurburgring under 7:40 ... ???
it's active suspesion, smart AWD, and an F1 gearbox.

The car is constantly deciding where to apply the power, and the active shocks give it the right rates for the situation.
Old 10-24-2007, 11:52 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,725
Received 558 Likes on 368 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
it's active suspesion, smart AWD, and an F1 gearbox.

The car is constantly deciding where to apply the power, and the active shocks give it the right rates for the situation.
Exactly, unlike the Z06, the GTR actually gets traction. I'm going to sit patiently for the V-Spec to drop.
Old 10-24-2007, 11:58 AM
  #29  
Super Member
 
JDM_SXE-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South CA (LA, 818) & North CA (SJ, 408)
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E500
The more I find out about the Skyline, the more I become a fan.
Old 10-24-2007, 12:04 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
R35 GT-R, EvoX
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Exactly, unlike the Z06, the GTR actually gets traction. I'm going to sit patiently for the V-Spec to drop.
I wish I had that patience...the V-spec will be an amazing package

Although its nothing a few mods can't fix
Old 10-24-2007, 12:06 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
I wonder if v spec will be MUCH lighter?
Old 10-24-2007, 12:55 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Exactly, unlike the Z06, the GTR actually gets traction. I'm going to sit patiently for the V-Spec to drop.



Oh please. The Z06 weighs 20% less an has more power. Sorry but a little better traction isn't going to make up for that.
Old 10-24-2007, 01:09 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
user 76208202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK550
Originally Posted by chiphomme
Oh please. The Z06 weighs 20% less an has more power. Sorry but a little better traction isn't going to make up for that.
Your wrong, a little better traction IS going to make up for the power loss. Your being proven wrong by the #'s, the Skyline is faster...why? it gets tractiosn. Its not rocket science.....no use in power if you can't get it to stick.
Old 10-24-2007, 02:13 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by Amiricanmade
Your wrong, a little better traction IS going to make up for the power loss. Your being proven wrong by the #'s, the Skyline is faster...why? it gets tractiosn. Its not rocket science.....no use in power if you can't get it to stick.


It isn't going to make up for that much power and weight difference. You may get a jump off the line but once the wheels hook up its over. A good example is the 997 Turbo versus the GT2 (and they're a lot closer performance wise).
Now, let me clarify. I think the Skyline is great. I just think its a bit heavy. And the 7:38 'ring time is a bit suspicious.
Old 10-24-2007, 02:56 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
C63OrNotToC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Acura MDX
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
tough choice! But AWD and 3.5 to 60mph would win it for me!
AWD + DSG would be the big selling points for me on the GTR. That being said, the styling for me is down in the basement along with the IS-F. Love the C63, but the RWD is troubling given my areas 'aptitude for inclement weather'.
Old 10-24-2007, 04:17 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by chiphomme
I think the Skyline is great. I just think its a bit heavy. And the 7:38 'ring time is a bit suspicious.


http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?vie...ID=0&tID=10073

you can find 2 times for GT-R there and one is 7:35

Old 10-24-2007, 04:38 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
R35 GT-R, EvoX
The 7:38 is recorded on video and can be found on youtube. It was also stated that it hit 7:38 in less than optimal conditions (2 parts of the track were wet).

I'm hearing lots of rumors that the GT-R's hp ratings are really at the wheels...but who knows, theres going to be lots of speculation from now until they start to get delivered into the hands of the customers.

I'm just glad the car looks very refined and can be used as a daily driver in comparison with a Z06.
Old 10-24-2007, 05:02 PM
  #38  
Super Member
 
ultraseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: san francisco
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32
anyone has a link to the unveiling video? I couldn't find it on gtrnissan.com and it's not on Edmunds or MSN either.
Old 10-24-2007, 05:34 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,725
Received 558 Likes on 368 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by chiphomme
Oh please. The Z06 weighs 20% less an has more power. Sorry but a little better traction isn't going to make up for that.
Uhh....to late, it already did. Look at the numbers again. STOCK it runs an 11.7. The weight difference won't mean much with a few light mods, it will annihilate Z06's.
Old 10-24-2007, 05:47 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
user 76208202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK550
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Uhh....to late, it already did. Look at the numbers again. STOCK it runs an 11.7. The weight difference won't mean much with a few light mods, it will annihilate Z06's.
Annihilate it will. I'm starting to like it more and more the more i read about it. I think once i see one without the ugly wing, slammed on some 20's i will fall in love. Only downfall to the GT-R is that it's not too practival. Now i konw the 997's and Z06's are less practical becuase they have no back seats (and my Z eighter) but the GT-R just seems like a videogame car. Kina too good to be true. I'm attracted to the C63 becuase it will be just as fast on a 1/4 mile yet have alot more comfort and class. Who konws, anything can change in two years.
Old 10-24-2007, 06:35 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,725
Received 558 Likes on 368 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by Amiricanmade
Annihilate it will. I'm starting to like it more and more the more i read about it. I think once i see one without the ugly wing, slammed on some 20's i will fall in love. Only downfall to the GT-R is that it's not too practival. Now i konw the 997's and Z06's are less practical becuase they have no back seats (and my Z eighter) but the GT-R just seems like a videogame car. Kina too good to be true. I'm attracted to the C63 becuase it will be just as fast on a 1/4 mile yet have alot more comfort and class. Who konws, anything can change in two years.

Carlos Ghosn swears it's a Daily Driver. When that man says something, you believe it. With its AWD you can drive it all year round.
Old 10-24-2007, 08:58 PM
  #42  
Super Member
 
IdriveFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
I had read that the previous R33 and R34 GT-R's both held respective nurburgring records upon their release.

The R34 held the nurburgring record until dethroned by the 996 turbo.

The R34 was released in 1999 and the 996 Turbo was released in 2000/2001. That means the R34 was faster around the 'ring than the Ferrari 360.

Impressive stuff.
Old 10-24-2007, 09:51 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
user 76208202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK550
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Carlos Ghosn swears it's a Daily Driver. When that man says something, you believe it. With its AWD you can drive it all year round.


haha. Ya i konw i know, but i need to see it first, and i need to see how much i like the interior. It seems somewaht BOXIE! I hopppppppppppe the C63 AMG comes with a lil nicer interior than the C350. I really really want sueade headliner
Old 10-24-2007, 10:08 PM
  #44  
Member
 
hakaida442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'11 997.2 Carrera GTS
If it's just about performance then the GTR wins easily. This car is going to be scary because there's going to be so much mods out there. It's going to be like the Mk. IV supra.
Old 10-24-2007, 10:31 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Uhh....to late, it already did. Look at the numbers again. STOCK it runs an 11.7. The weight difference won't mean much with a few light mods, it will annihilate Z06's.

How was the car spec'd when they ran a 7:35? Sorry but it was consistently around 8:00 then magically it turned a 7:38. Sorry but it sounds modified.
Again I think its astonishing but I doubt a 3800lbs car with under 600 HP can go around that fast.
Old 10-24-2007, 10:34 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by Amiricanmade
Annihilate it will. I'm starting to like it more and more the more i read about it. I think once i see one without the ugly wing, slammed on some 20's i will fall in love. Only downfall to the GT-R is that it's not too practival. Now i konw the 997's and Z06's are less practical becuase they have no back seats (and my Z eighter) but the GT-R just seems like a videogame car. Kina too good to be true. I'm attracted to the C63 becuase it will be just as fast on a 1/4 mile yet have alot more comfort and class. Who konws, anything can change in two years.
The C63 doesn't run a sub 12 second quarter mile. The GTR will flat out waste a C63 in any performance measurement.
Old 10-24-2007, 10:53 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by chiphomme
How was the car spec'd when they ran a 7:35? Sorry but it was consistently around 8:00 then magically it turned a 7:38. Sorry but it sounds modified.
Again I think its astonishing but I doubt a 3800lbs car with under 600 HP can go around that fast.
where and how was it 8:00 consistently?
Old 10-24-2007, 10:55 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGe_fyhQazg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsbfE4RDVgY

Last edited by BoBcanada; 10-24-2007 at 11:41 PM.
Old 10-24-2007, 11:10 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
where and how was it 8:00 consistently?
"The company says that, during development testing at the Nrburgring Nordschleife racetrack in Germany, the GT-R consistently turned in lap times of about eight seconds, with a best time of 7 minutes, 38 seconds, "



http://www.automobilemag.com/new_and...t-r/index.html


and yes they have a typo

Last edited by chiphomme; 10-24-2007 at 11:12 PM.
Old 10-24-2007, 11:21 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
SO.... they were getting 8s not pushing it... i guess, the car is capable of doing under 7:40 times and they proved it. Get over it! Its a technological achievement of Nissan hat off to them, I might even buy this car! Its great . Will I ever attempt going to the ring and run 7:38? I don't think so! Will I Enjoy SMARTEST AWD, TUNABILITY, and 3.5 to a 60 mph??? ABSOLUTELY!!! But I damn sure it will be my 2nd car tho!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: C63 or new Skyline GTR?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 AM.