How can we get the full potential of our 6.3?
Is there a way to get this untapped power? Would it be a chip or is it more complicated than that like head work?
...I'm new to the AMG scene and I haven't studied the 6.2, but I did go through a rebuild for my 3.6 in my 911 and I know that how well an engine breaths is a huge factor in tapping into more power. So, until the tuners do their thing, I think it'll be hard to know where the bottlenecks are on the C63. Maybe it IS the ECU that's detuned and bottleneck. Maybe the diameter of this or that on the intake side is tight, or there's a lot of turbulence in the intake manifold. Who knows. Probably noone at this point. We know the 6.2 is the same 6.2 found in other cars. So, power gets maximized by the freedom/amt of air that you can move into it and out of it, then tuning the ecu to get to the ideal AFR.
Is there a way to get this untapped power? Would it be a chip or is it more complicated than that like head work?
the C63, and im pretty sure all AMG 63's come with 2 types of air filters
the normal ones, and an added charcoal air filter
many ppl here have removed the charcoal filters, and then re-dyno'd
they say it adds anywhere from 10-20 HP
pretty slick for something so easy and free
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Is there a way to get this untapped power? Would it be a chip or is it more complicated than that like head work?
If you abide by these rules please drive in the far right lane...
(sorry off topic)
They always try to holeshot me to the open lane on the freeway when I'm in my wife's bug. But, I always win b/c Turbo Bugs rule! ...a least when I'm racing against Priuses.
"The thing with the 63's is, they tend to get a lot faster after the first 5k miles or so.
When the E63 came out, everybody was saying the same thing. It was a slow pig and just wouldn't go fast. They were getting walked all over the place by E39 M5's, etc. But now, even the bone stock ones have loosened up to where they're down in the 12s.
So I would say it's way too early to write the C63 off yet. It's much lighter than the E63, which after getting broken in turned out to be a strong performer. The C63 has the same motor and weighs less. It's not rocket science that it should be faster eventually.
I also don't think Mercedes' claims of "de-tuning" are anything more than marketing hype designed to avoid the possibility of steering E63 buyers into buying the cheaper E63. The E55's were allegedly 469hp instead of the 500 or so that the same engine produces in CL and S class applications, for the same marketing reasons. However, the dyno comparisons of S55's and E55's proved they are exactly the same...and I bet the same thing is happening with the C63 vs. E63 numbers.
And even if they did manage to de-tune it, getting the ECU done will fix that immediately for almost no money, at which point it's a no-brainer that the C63 will outperform the E63 because of the weight difference. Personally, I think the C63 is going to be a very strong performer when they get broken in."
Last edited by C63newdude; Sep 1, 2009 at 12:47 AM.
the C63, and im pretty sure all AMG 63's come with 2 types of air filters
the normal ones, and an added charcoal air filter
many ppl here have removed the charcoal filters, and then re-dyno'd
they say it adds anywhere from 10-20 HP
pretty slick for something so easy and free



