Hey MNL ICE, C63 this
10-08-2008, 12:05 AM
#151
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
ah here we go... after visiting the BMW site and reviewing the performance numbers of the m3 and the m3 dct, it appears as though sticky was right. the m3 dct is faster than a standard manual m3 (4.6s vs 4.8s) where 4.6 is an impressive number, it doesnt change the fact that it is a far cry from the C63 posted official 0-60 of 4.3.... nevermind all that right? you want to experience the race for yourself? real world dynamics apply to only the m3 dct right? well why did road and track test the c63 at 4.1? and why do many other sources claim 3.9?
face it sticky. the m3 dct is going to be slower every time, unless you weigh 100lbs and the guy youre racing in the merc weighs 300lbs, then you MIGHT catch up to the c63 IF you get your launch mode working right.... forget the rolling starts.
m3 = slow. sorry bmw, the c43 c55 and c63 have been faster than the bmw m counterpart in straight line racing. e36 e46 and e92, respectively, of course.
ill also bet that a c32 can give a e46 a really close run if not come out a bumper ahead.
face it sticky. the m3 dct is going to be slower every time, unless you weigh 100lbs and the guy youre racing in the merc weighs 300lbs, then you MIGHT catch up to the c63 IF you get your launch mode working right.... forget the rolling starts.
m3 = slow. sorry bmw, the c43 c55 and c63 have been faster than the bmw m counterpart in straight line racing. e36 e46 and e92, respectively, of course.
ill also bet that a c32 can give a e46 a really close run if not come out a bumper ahead.
10-08-2008, 12:23 AM
#152
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Taipei Taiwan
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'10 E63 Obsidiant Black; '06 R350 Alabaster White; 05 C55 Obsidiant Black (sold)
IMO this guys is just trying to get some fun races and came up with a humorous way to get attentions.. you guys are taking it too seriously..
10-08-2008, 12:35 AM
#153
MBWorld Fanatic!
10-08-2008, 02:33 AM
#154
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Buena Park CA
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
89 300ce//// 86 190e 2.3-16v//// 12 CLS63
Hmm...Since when does anyone at HMS know how I drive? Is this another imaginary conversation?...Like how you thought I'd roll with you to a Beemer meet (that you probably wouldn't race at)? 
Who buys a C63 for looks? Buy a C300 and throw some pretty little wheels on it if you're about aesthetic instead of performance...don't waste a good engine. Do me a favor and press the "C-->S-->M" button by the gear shift, put it in Manual and try to learn why they call it the M3 Killer instead of talking about M3s in your rearview when you don't even race them...
Anyways, I really don't see why so many people are getting butthurt
So it's a tried & true fact that the C63 beats the M3 straight line...and that it's a different situation when it comes to handling. But just because it's been proven and we all know the outcome doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun to race anyways. Since when does already knowing who's car is faster stop anyone from playing around on the track? Live a little, boys
Racing and beer. Sounds like good, clean fun to me.
Who buys a C63 for looks? Buy a C300 and throw some pretty little wheels on it if you're about aesthetic instead of performance...don't waste a good engine. Do me a favor and press the "C-->S-->M" button by the gear shift, put it in Manual and try to learn why they call it the M3 Killer instead of talking about M3s in your rearview when you don't even race them...
Anyways, I really don't see why so many people are getting butthurt
So it's a tried & true fact that the C63 beats the M3 straight line...and that it's a different situation when it comes to handling. But just because it's been proven and we all know the outcome doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun to race anyways. Since when does already knowing who's car is faster stop anyone from playing around on the track? Live a little, boys
Racing and beer. Sounds like good, clean fun to me.
Well well well we have someone here with a C63 are you willing to take that challenge. Race sticky2 and make us all proud if you lose we can all say a girl was driving.
10-08-2008, 02:38 AM
#155
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ah here we go... after visiting the BMW site and reviewing the performance numbers of the m3 and the m3 dct, it appears as though sticky was right. the m3 dct is faster than a standard manual m3 (4.6s vs 4.8s) where 4.6 is an impressive number, it doesnt change the fact that it is a far cry from the C63 posted official 0-60 of 4.3.... nevermind all that right? you want to experience the race for yourself? real world dynamics apply to only the m3 dct right? well why did road and track test the c63 at 4.1? and why do many other sources claim 3.9?
face it sticky. the m3 dct is going to be slower every time, unless you weigh 100lbs and the guy youre racing in the merc weighs 300lbs, then you MIGHT catch up to the c63 IF you get your launch mode working right.... forget the rolling starts.
m3 = slow. sorry bmw, the c43 c55 and c63 have been faster than the bmw m counterpart in straight line racing. e36 e46 and e92, respectively, of course.
ill also bet that a c32 can give a e46 a really close run if not come out a bumper ahead.
face it sticky. the m3 dct is going to be slower every time, unless you weigh 100lbs and the guy youre racing in the merc weighs 300lbs, then you MIGHT catch up to the c63 IF you get your launch mode working right.... forget the rolling starts.
m3 = slow. sorry bmw, the c43 c55 and c63 have been faster than the bmw m counterpart in straight line racing. e36 e46 and e92, respectively, of course.
ill also bet that a c32 can give a e46 a really close run if not come out a bumper ahead.
I guess it is a done deal, sorry for wasting everyones time. No need for the track, apparently SeeKlasse solved it all.
I'll remind you of this post after the track day.
I already did the C32 from E46 M3 thing back in the day, it was the M3 that came out several bumpers ahead, from a stop and from a roll. Heresy, I know, as apparently the C32 should win because you typed it so.
10-08-2008, 02:41 AM
#156
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are some pretty cool guys on here, who "got it" on page 1. Then there are the other people who would rather sit around and type BS.Looks like the track day is coming along nicely, still no confirmed C63 though.
10-08-2008, 03:10 AM
#158
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
ah here we go... after visiting the BMW site and reviewing the performance numbers of the m3 and the m3 dct, it appears as though sticky was right. the m3 dct is faster than a standard manual m3 (4.6s vs 4.8s) where 4.6 is an impressive number, it doesnt change the fact that it is a far cry from the C63 posted official 0-60 of 4.3.... nevermind all that right? you want to experience the race for yourself? real world dynamics apply to only the m3 dct right? well why did road and track test the c63 at 4.1? and why do many other sources claim 3.9?
face it sticky. the m3 dct is going to be slower every time, unless you weigh 100lbs and the guy youre racing in the merc weighs 300lbs, then you MIGHT catch up to the c63 IF you get your launch mode working right.... forget the rolling starts.
m3 = slow. sorry bmw, the c43 c55 and c63 have been faster than the bmw m counterpart in straight line racing. e36 e46 and e92, respectively, of course.
ill also bet that a c32 can give a e46 a really close run if not come out a bumper ahead.
face it sticky. the m3 dct is going to be slower every time, unless you weigh 100lbs and the guy youre racing in the merc weighs 300lbs, then you MIGHT catch up to the c63 IF you get your launch mode working right.... forget the rolling starts.
m3 = slow. sorry bmw, the c43 c55 and c63 have been faster than the bmw m counterpart in straight line racing. e36 e46 and e92, respectively, of course.
ill also bet that a c32 can give a e46 a really close run if not come out a bumper ahead.
10-08-2008, 03:13 AM
#159
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Seriously, you are going by manufacturer quoted numbers? SERIOUSLY?
I guess it is a done deal, sorry for wasting everyones time. No need for the track, apparently SeeKlasse solved it all.
I'll remind you of this post after the track day.
I already did the C32 from E46 M3 thing back in the day, it was the M3 that came out several bumpers ahead, from a stop and from a roll. Heresy, I know, as apparently the C32 should win because you typed it so.
I guess it is a done deal, sorry for wasting everyones time. No need for the track, apparently SeeKlasse solved it all.
I'll remind you of this post after the track day.
I already did the C32 from E46 M3 thing back in the day, it was the M3 that came out several bumpers ahead, from a stop and from a roll. Heresy, I know, as apparently the C32 should win because you typed it so.
10-08-2008, 03:15 AM
#160
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
Seriously, you are going by manufacturer quoted numbers? SERIOUSLY?
I guess it is a done deal, sorry for wasting everyones time. No need for the track, apparently SeeKlasse solved it all.
I'll remind you of this post after the track day.
I already did the C32 from E46 M3 thing back in the day, it was the M3 that came out several bumpers ahead, from a stop and from a roll. Heresy, I know, as apparently the C32 should win because you typed it so.
I guess it is a done deal, sorry for wasting everyones time. No need for the track, apparently SeeKlasse solved it all.
I'll remind you of this post after the track day.
I already did the C32 from E46 M3 thing back in the day, it was the M3 that came out several bumpers ahead, from a stop and from a roll. Heresy, I know, as apparently the C32 should win because you typed it so.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/M...Audi_32798.htm
10-08-2008, 03:15 AM
#161
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-08-2008, 03:34 AM
#162
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
Did you not see the video of the DCT M3 Cab LOSING to the C63? Quit with this conspiracy nonsense, the owners bring their own cars and run them. You think the C63 owner was trying to lose? Seemed to me like he wasn't.
Regardless, November 1st we will have some fun runs. You are welcome to come, bring as many issues of Autobild with you as you like.
Regardless, November 1st we will have some fun runs. You are welcome to come, bring as many issues of Autobild with you as you like.
So a C63 actually wins over a CAB M3 DCT?! WOW! How noble of them?!
Just to put that into context:
BMW 335 Ci E92 Automatik - 2006 (Serie)
Motorart R 6 Benziner
Hubraum 2979 ccm
Aufladung BiTurbo 0,6 bar/Euro 4
PS - UMin 306 PS (225 kW) - 5800/Min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 1300/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 6/Automatik
Test in Auto Zeitung Jahrbuch 2007
Gewicht 1609 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,8 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,3 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,1 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 9,2 s
0 - 160 km/h 11,9 s
0 - 180 km/h 14,9 s
0 - 200 km/h 18,7 s
0 - 250 km/h - s
400 m, stehender Start - s
1 km, stehender Start - s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 36,1 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 35,2 m
Nordschleife - min
Hockenheim, kleiner Kurs - min
Motopark Oschersleben - min
max. Querbeschleunigung - g
Slalom 18 m 64,5 km/h
Slalom 36 m - km/h
ISO Ausweichtest 110 m - km/h
Testverbrauch min/max/ges -/-/12,3 L/SP
Grundpreis 45.300 Euro (11/2006)
Testwagenpreis - Euro (-/2006)
BMW M3 Cabrio Drivelogic (DKG) E93 - 2008 (Serie)
Motorart V 8 Benziner
Hubraum 3999 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro4
PS - UMin 420 PS (309 kW) - 8300/min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 3900/min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/sequentiell (Doppelkupplungsgetriebe)
Test in sport auto 06/2008
Gewicht 1870 kg
0 - 80 km/h - s
0 - 100 km/h 5,2 s
0 - 120 km/h - s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h - s
0 - 160 km/h - s
0 - 180 km/h - s
0 - 200 km/h 18,4 s
BMW M3 Cabrio Drivelogic (DKG) E93 - 2008 (Serie)
Motorart V 8 Benziner
Hubraum 3999 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro 4
PS - UMin 420 PS (309 kW) - 8300/min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 3900/min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/sequentiell (Doppelkupplungsgetriebe)
Test in auto motor und sport 18/2008
Gewicht 1839 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,9 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,5 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,3 s
0 - 130 km/h 8,4 s
0 - 140 km/h 9,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 15,4 s
0 - 200 km/h 19,3 s
So now we are talking... Next we can start the conversation where a 335i can take the C63 all over again. If you want BMW compassion please go to the M5meassageboard. You will get a lot of pro posts.
If you want to come to Finland anytime soon with you worlds fastest M3 you are very welcome to try to see if your car is faster than my E55.
You can take as many M5 messageboard videos with you as you can.
Oh and wait, actually we do now have scientifically proved data that the E55 is faster than the C63 dont we. Because there is a VIDEO about it, wow!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmQ94HHK7BE
Now we can all stop talking about it because there is a video to prove it...
10-08-2008, 04:25 AM
#164
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank You!
So a C63 actually wins over a CAB M3 DCT?! WOW! How noble of them?!
Just to put that into context:
BMW 335 Ci E92 Automatik - 2006 (Serie)
Motorart R 6 Benziner
Hubraum 2979 ccm
Aufladung BiTurbo 0,6 bar/Euro 4
PS - UMin 306 PS (225 kW) - 5800/Min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 1300/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 6/Automatik
Test in Auto Zeitung Jahrbuch 2007
Gewicht 1609 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,8 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,3 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,1 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 9,2 s
0 - 160 km/h 11,9 s
0 - 180 km/h 14,9 s
0 - 200 km/h 18,7 s
0 - 250 km/h - s
400 m, stehender Start - s
1 km, stehender Start - s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 36,1 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 35,2 m
Nordschleife - min
Hockenheim, kleiner Kurs - min
Motopark Oschersleben - min
max. Querbeschleunigung - g
Slalom 18 m 64,5 km/h
Slalom 36 m - km/h
ISO Ausweichtest 110 m - km/h
Testverbrauch min/max/ges -/-/12,3 L/SP
Grundpreis 45.300 Euro (11/2006)
Testwagenpreis - Euro (-/2006)
BMW M3 Cabrio Drivelogic (DKG) E93 - 2008 (Serie)
Motorart V 8 Benziner
Hubraum 3999 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro4
PS - UMin 420 PS (309 kW) - 8300/min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 3900/min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/sequentiell (Doppelkupplungsgetriebe)
Test in sport auto 06/2008
Gewicht 1870 kg
0 - 80 km/h - s
0 - 100 km/h 5,2 s
0 - 120 km/h - s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h - s
0 - 160 km/h - s
0 - 180 km/h - s
0 - 200 km/h 18,4 s
BMW M3 Cabrio Drivelogic (DKG) E93 - 2008 (Serie)
Motorart V 8 Benziner
Hubraum 3999 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro 4
PS - UMin 420 PS (309 kW) - 8300/min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 3900/min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/sequentiell (Doppelkupplungsgetriebe)
Test in auto motor und sport 18/2008
Gewicht 1839 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,9 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,5 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,3 s
0 - 130 km/h 8,4 s
0 - 140 km/h 9,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 15,4 s
0 - 200 km/h 19,3 s
So now we are talking... Next we can start the conversation where a 335i can take the C63 all over again. If you want BMW compassion please go to the M5meassageboard. You will get a lot of pro posts.
If you want to come to Finland anytime soon with you worlds fastest M3 you are very welcome to try to see if your car is faster than my E55.
You can take as many M5 messageboard videos with you as you can.
Oh and wait, actually we do now have scientifically proved data that the E55 is faster than the C63 dont we. Because there is a VIDEO about it, wow!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmQ94HHK7BE
Now we can all stop talking about it because there is a video to prove it...
So a C63 actually wins over a CAB M3 DCT?! WOW! How noble of them?!
Just to put that into context:
BMW 335 Ci E92 Automatik - 2006 (Serie)
Motorart R 6 Benziner
Hubraum 2979 ccm
Aufladung BiTurbo 0,6 bar/Euro 4
PS - UMin 306 PS (225 kW) - 5800/Min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 1300/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 6/Automatik
Test in Auto Zeitung Jahrbuch 2007
Gewicht 1609 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,8 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,3 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,1 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 9,2 s
0 - 160 km/h 11,9 s
0 - 180 km/h 14,9 s
0 - 200 km/h 18,7 s
0 - 250 km/h - s
400 m, stehender Start - s
1 km, stehender Start - s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 36,1 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 35,2 m
Nordschleife - min
Hockenheim, kleiner Kurs - min
Motopark Oschersleben - min
max. Querbeschleunigung - g
Slalom 18 m 64,5 km/h
Slalom 36 m - km/h
ISO Ausweichtest 110 m - km/h
Testverbrauch min/max/ges -/-/12,3 L/SP
Grundpreis 45.300 Euro (11/2006)
Testwagenpreis - Euro (-/2006)
BMW M3 Cabrio Drivelogic (DKG) E93 - 2008 (Serie)
Motorart V 8 Benziner
Hubraum 3999 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro4
PS - UMin 420 PS (309 kW) - 8300/min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 3900/min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/sequentiell (Doppelkupplungsgetriebe)
Test in sport auto 06/2008
Gewicht 1870 kg
0 - 80 km/h - s
0 - 100 km/h 5,2 s
0 - 120 km/h - s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h - s
0 - 160 km/h - s
0 - 180 km/h - s
0 - 200 km/h 18,4 s
BMW M3 Cabrio Drivelogic (DKG) E93 - 2008 (Serie)
Motorart V 8 Benziner
Hubraum 3999 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro 4
PS - UMin 420 PS (309 kW) - 8300/min
Nm - UMin 400 Nm - 3900/min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/sequentiell (Doppelkupplungsgetriebe)
Test in auto motor und sport 18/2008
Gewicht 1839 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,9 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,5 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,3 s
0 - 130 km/h 8,4 s
0 - 140 km/h 9,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 15,4 s
0 - 200 km/h 19,3 s
So now we are talking... Next we can start the conversation where a 335i can take the C63 all over again. If you want BMW compassion please go to the M5meassageboard. You will get a lot of pro posts.
If you want to come to Finland anytime soon with you worlds fastest M3 you are very welcome to try to see if your car is faster than my E55.
You can take as many M5 messageboard videos with you as you can.
Oh and wait, actually we do now have scientifically proved data that the E55 is faster than the C63 dont we. Because there is a VIDEO about it, wow!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmQ94HHK7BE
Now we can all stop talking about it because there is a video to prove it...
Post up a whole thesis on the subject if you like. Take until November 2nd to do the research on it. Really put some effort into it!
10-08-2008, 04:36 AM
#165
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AL,IL, GA, CA
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS, SLK, ETC
drama drama drama...
MNL ice doesn't want to race sticky... Thats' his choice.. No need to say he doesn't have *****.. It's not like some of you will pay for his speeding tix if he gets one...
Now, there are many C63 owners in Kali.. Just find one to race you.. Chrisdpharm? 's gf got one as well rite? There u go sticky! that's ur next target!
Do post vid of the result..
MNL ice doesn't want to race sticky... Thats' his choice.. No need to say he doesn't have *****.. It's not like some of you will pay for his speeding tix if he gets one...
Now, there are many C63 owners in Kali.. Just find one to race you.. Chrisdpharm? 's gf got one as well rite? There u go sticky! that's ur next target!
Do post vid of the result..
10-08-2008, 05:00 AM
#166
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 E55 BEAST
But back on topic. I think sticky2 came off as a jerk in the beginning but it seems to me like he is a car fanatic liuke most of us and he just wants to have some good fun. I dont know about his M3 being faster than a C63, but I know that his M3 could outhandle a C63. Different cars. It would suck if MB and BMW copied each other and made similar cars. Then it would be easy for us to pick which one is best, but MB and BMW make different cars. I think it would be awesome to get some races set up. Sticky2, if you're ever in the LA area let me know so we can get some runs set up, its not a 63, but we couls still have some fun.
But seriously... some of you guys are nagging like little b!tches on their periods. Just get a bigger tampon and STFU.
Thank you for listening and now back to your regularly scheduled program.
10-08-2008, 05:02 AM
#167
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 E55 BEAST
And +1 to getting ChrisDPham's GF racing Sticky2. Lol. If she wins Sticky2 was beat by a girl, and if he wins then we can say a girl was driving. Lol.
No offense to girls. God knows I like them more than guys. Maybe.
No offense to girls. God knows I like them more than guys. Maybe.
10-08-2008, 05:33 AM
#168
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
last thing to add for this thread:
i've seen videos of C63 beating M3 and M3 beating C63 on youtube. there are quite a lot of them.
however my question is in a day to day situation on the road and on the freeway and maybe at a stop light what are the chances that you'll be doing a launch control launch in the M3 where in the C63 all you need is a quick press of the ESP off button. IMO it's more about the driver than anything.
recent Fifth Gear test of the IS-F and M3 sedan MDCT. the IS-F was only .10 slower than the M3 around the track. to be honest I'm actually more impressed with the IS-Fake exhaust tips than neither the M3 or the C63.
i've seen videos of C63 beating M3 and M3 beating C63 on youtube. there are quite a lot of them.
however my question is in a day to day situation on the road and on the freeway and maybe at a stop light what are the chances that you'll be doing a launch control launch in the M3 where in the C63 all you need is a quick press of the ESP off button. IMO it's more about the driver than anything.
recent Fifth Gear test of the IS-F and M3 sedan MDCT. the IS-F was only .10 slower than the M3 around the track. to be honest I'm actually more impressed with the IS-Fake exhaust tips than neither the M3 or the C63.
10-08-2008, 10:40 AM
#169
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SS Minnow Johnson
10-08-2008, 11:37 AM
#170
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
lol i cant see you in your sig pic, you should have smiled!!
i know the euro m3 was much faster than the c43. but i stand firm that the c55>e46 m3. also the c63>e92
i know the euro m3 was much faster than the c43. but i stand firm that the c55>e46 m3. also the c63>e92
10-08-2008, 12:14 PM
#171
MBWorld Fanatic!
New Thread Please....C63-LSD VS M3-DCT....Coz my username is the title of this topic..Im becoming famous now, in a bad way, The guy with the chipped C63 who got no *****
Last edited by MNL ICE; 10-08-2008 at 12:24 PM.
10-08-2008, 01:18 PM
#172
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
yes! i was just noticing that the c63 used for all the previous professional tests was sans lsd and performance package.... is that performance package 030? id like to see numbers around a track for the c63 p030(lsd) vs m3 dct....
10-08-2008, 04:00 PM
#174
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-08-2008, 04:32 PM
#175
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W124's
