My MHP Experience
That is 520.5hp at the crank - using the 17.5% or 522.7 using 18%
All in 5th gear - Video to prove it. watch the speedo - near 300km/hr is redline in 5th...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQCv2eB9z2I
Last numbers I saw from EvoSport - which are stickeyd, are 430hp and 385 ft-lbs (in 5th) - this tune is 13hp and 21 ft-lbs higher
here is a link to the comparisons - MHP has them all beat - by alot!
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ners-mods.html
The reason why they made the car with 451hp is because when you have 520 you can not control the bloody thing, this thing was a beast, now its a beast out of its cage, i have trouble finding traction in most of 2nd and sometimes in 3rd ... way different, way better...wayyyyy more tires.
I have attached a very high quality scan of the dynos - one weather corrected numbers one not - the weather correction factor was .96. and everyone will see the huge gain over stock.
Stock Base line was done on same dyno, same set up, same operators. I have 350Km on my tune...ill re dyno at 1000.
take it for what it is - a ***king insane tune.
Last edited by stefario; Feb 12, 2009 at 09:21 PM.
In all fairness the month did include Christmas and New Years - i dont get much **** done in that period either.
To make it easier to compare the numbers across multiple tuners, it'd be great if you can re-dyno the car on a dynojet and in 4th gear. This should make it easier to compare this MHP-tuned C63 dyno sheet to Evosport/Powerchip's tuned C63 dyno sheet.
A month for a copy and paste (flash) tune?
That's what we're talking about, right?
How about one day out and one day back like VRP flashed my 55 ecu?
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
How can you say MHP has them beat by alot? All these dyno's are on done all over the country on different dynos.
This data is not exactly fair since the ML63 has bigger wheels and tires, that would result in baseline dyno number along with flashed numbers to be lower.
If your tune is making you happy than that is all that matters.
Jimmy

7% of 446 rwhp is about 31 hp. Even if we take only half of that figure, we get 16 hp + 8 to 10 hp gained if dynoed in 4th gear + original 13 hp difference, we should get at least 30 hp difference between the tunes. I think the op should dyno in 4th gear and on a dynojet, then compare it directly to Evosport, RennTech, etc....
Last edited by MB_Forever; Feb 13, 2009 at 03:52 AM.
I did 4 runs - the last 3 were all 452-453 Non corrected.
Pick it apart all you want, i sent my ecu to Andy and i got a solid tune that was proved immediatly on a 3rd party dyno - that is what i gave him my money for.
tell me where a DynoJet station is near Vancouver and ill try and make it there ...
are there any PC/ Renntech / Kleeman dyno's availalbe - could someone link it if there is ?

Based on the reported gains I would say the results are pretty much what I saw with my Renntech program on my car.These 1/4 mile times with Drag Radial are not real world for most on this forum since we are running stock sized street tires.
Thanks to AMG for letting us uncork so much power with a simple ECU tune!







