Naive tire question 275 v 255
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Naive tire question 275 v 255
Yea, this may be very basic and I think I know the answer, but why go to a 275 tire on the rear (18") versus a 255? The 275 if 6 lbs heavier so logic dictates it actually costs performance, but also logic says that there's now an additional six or so square inches of contact patch so the car hooks up better.
Is there more to this than meets they eye? At 5500 I need to dump my stocker rears and am trying to decide 255 or 275.
Thanks all!
Is there more to this than meets they eye? At 5500 I need to dump my stocker rears and am trying to decide 255 or 275.
Thanks all!
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Thanks for the suggestion - any reason why though? Is it the contact patch v weight issue as I suspect? What's the physics play here?
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I doubt it does anything - it's 10mm wider and at 35 that's 3.5 mm taller or bigger diameter. Original question stands though - anyone?
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
![word](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
Just switched to 265/35/18s for the rears last week. I get so much less tire spin now. Even pulling out of my neighborhood which is an uphill right turn I'd get some inside tire spin. Now it is much less. I'm hoping the rears last longer now and I like the added traction.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
If the real speed is 60 mph then the odometer on the 265 shod car will read 59.3
Just add 1 mph to what the odometer says when driving the 265 car.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
I had seen somewhere posted in this forum that you could input the new tire size in the nav computer and it would correct for that?? If not, then my theory is that since most car manufacturers might have the speedo read slightly higher than actual, a slightly larger diameter tire would correct for that and give you a true indication of speed(since your RPMs will stay the same for a given speed).
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
I had seen somewhere posted in this forum that you could input the new tire size in the nav computer and it would correct for that?? If not, then my theory is that since most car manufacturers might have the speedo read slightly higher than actual, a slightly larger diameter tire would correct for that and give you a true indication of speed(since your RPMs will stay the same for a given speed).
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
#13
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: austin,tx
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09 C63
straight line 275's are fine. but can barely make it around a turn at the posted limit without the traction control going off and quick lane changes especially under power almost set the car into a tank slapper. not having fun at all on them right now. The crappy bridgestones that i have that are probably a large part of it. tire data for this car especially for handling is few and far between. i may just suck it up and go back to the pzero's instead of putzing around trying to find a "better" tire.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Anyone else with 275 care to speak up on this subject? I hope that is not the case as I just ordered a set
Though Savoy - you mention that traction is coming on which leads me to believe that you're slipping rather than sticking - if that is the case, the size is probably unrelated.
HELP!
![Frown](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
HELP!
#15
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M156 and LS7
I just put on the Dunlop Direzza Sport Z1 Star Spec,235/40/18 front and 265/35/18 rear. Good tires, very sticky, feel even a bit quieter and softer than the Pzero. 265s fit the rear nice. 275 will be just fine, M3 have 265 PS2 tires in the rear, our cars need some fatter and sticky rubber
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
Anyone else with 275 care to speak up on this subject?
#18
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 BMW 330i, 2009 C63
I changed to 275 on the original rims, no problems what so ever on dry roads. I had some handling problems on some rainy days. I will go with 265.
George
George
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Well that settles that - between you guys and Gavin at the Tire Rack (great guy! no offense to Luke) I'm going 265. The biggest seller to me was the fact that the sidewall is taller - not a lot but this is almost 2 tons going on 450 torque after all.
#20
I put a set of 245's on the front and 275's on the rear (toyo RA1's). I have had the car on a road coarse and it handled great. The wider fronts help reduce the understeer which is still a problem in the slower corners. The tires also lasted longer than the stock tires eventhough they are R compound and were used for a track day.
#21
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego Area
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C63, SLK, F150
Think I should stop reading these post, you guys make to much sence and what you say about the tires are great comments. I have 275 rears and 245 fronts. All Egale F1, and I must say that I have not noticed any handling issues on the car as of yet. Although maybe I do not drive like others do, I only do 145mph on a daily basis and yes there are a few long sweeper turns in there, and the car handles great. I understand the taller tires with stock rims does throw off the odometer (need to add 1 mph) at all speeds above 7mph as based on radar gun. I agree with Earlyapex, that the car handles better in my opinion, and he has a better tire than mine. Personly I will remain with 275 and 245 setup until otherwise can see a big differeance. Like I say I do not drive the car like others here do, but I have 37,000 miles on it and most of it is hard driving, and having gone to Egale F1 I have put so far 13000 miles on the rear set. So for me the cost differeance vs. the handling to me is far outwieghs going back to lower width tires. I will be replacing all the suspension setup and tires and brakes soon, complete change to the car, but for now I have had ZERO problems with the wider tires and they do last longer as well. With agressive track runs, and hard cornering on these tires and stock rims, there is also no body rub and the handling is great. I am no Formula 1 driver so I do not push it as such and really do not want to pull the car out of the baricades, so do back off a little in the turns, but I have no complaints and will remain with wider tires. For me its cost effective and handling is very adiquite as well.I can run down the phyisics of the tires and compair them all, and back it all up with proven data, but you guys here are better at that then I am, so I will not go into that. All I say is do what your heart and foot tell you to do and for me I stay with my current setup until I change it over the "off season" for next year. I love the way it is now, sure can be better, could be a McLaren Mercedes, but for now we make do with what we have.
Follow your foot and heart, try and experiment, with tires they do not last long and after they wear out change to different type and or size and experiment to your own driving abilities and likes.
Follow your foot and heart, try and experiment, with tires they do not last long and after they wear out change to different type and or size and experiment to your own driving abilities and likes.
#22
Super Member
No problems with the Nitto NT05's, 275's on the rears. Keep in mind that a 275 in one brand is not the same for all brands. I would not go to a smaller tread width than I have now because the improvement is too good.
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Quinta, CALIF.
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2009 C63 Black on Black
![Talking](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
Anyone else with 275 care to speak up on this subject? I hope that is not the case as I just ordered a set
Though Savoy - you mention that traction is coming on which leads me to believe that you're slipping rather than sticking - if that is the case, the size is probably unrelated.
HELP!
![Frown](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
HELP!
I have the 275x35x18's on the rear in the Toyo T1R's
I love them. They handle better and reduce the spin dramatically too.
I will be going to 245x40x18 Toyo T1R's in the front shortly to match the rear diameter.
Just my opinion!
Good luck!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Phil
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 C63 K1
:
Just switched to 265/35/18s for the rears last week. I get so much less tire spin now. Even pulling out of my neighborhood which is an uphill right turn I'd get some inside tire spin. Now it is much less. I'm hoping the rears last longer now and I like the added traction.
Just switched to 265/35/18s for the rears last week. I get so much less tire spin now. Even pulling out of my neighborhood which is an uphill right turn I'd get some inside tire spin. Now it is much less. I'm hoping the rears last longer now and I like the added traction.
Also stayed with 235's on the front.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
I put a set of 245's on the front and 275's on the rear (toyo RA1's). I have had the car on a road coarse and it handled great. The wider fronts help reduce the understeer which is still a problem in the slower corners. The tires also lasted longer than the stock tires eventhough they are R compound and were used for a track day.