Super Member
i went to cory and did my tune 2 months ago and got 445whp...i have the dyno sheet in my car if any body wants to check it out i can take pic of it.
MBWorld Fanatic!
^^ Was that a 5th gear or 4th gear pull? What octane tune?
Super Member
Quote:
Numbers look just about the same as a K1 that was done here in California.
Originally Posted by James@ACGSD
Looking at your graph looks like you got whats expected from the tune, what we're your baseline TQ numbers if you dont mind me asking?Numbers look just about the same as a K1 that was done here in California.
Hey James,
Base dyno jet was average 3 pulls 353 HP 350 TQ....
Can you explain why I'm seeing spikes on every pull??? I didn't see any on my base pulls,,, could it be that I didn't set cars dyno mode?
I'll be going to another shop to Dyno jet again, we'll see...
Super Member
Quote:
5th gear because of the 1:1 gear ratio, which makes sense... 93 octaneOriginally Posted by Sincity
^^ Was that a 5th gear or 4th gear pull? What octane tune?
I'm dealing with a established speed shop...
MBWorld Fanatic!
I wonder why Cory told me that 4th gear is more accurate?
Super Member
Quote:
Sure send them to me...thanksOriginally Posted by alqamzi
i went to cory and did my tune 2 months ago and got 445whp...i have the dyno sheet in my car if any body wants to check it out i can take pic of it.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Numbers look just about the same as a K1 that was done here in California.
Originally Posted by James@ACGSD
Looking at your graph looks like you got whats expected from the tune, what we're your baseline TQ numbers if you dont mind me asking?Numbers look just about the same as a K1 that was done here in California.
I was just posting to show what I meant re: how to format WinPEP7 to show hp/tq and Air/Fuel on the same chart. My 289rwhp/280rwtq chart posted is what my C32 achieved, stock, and on a DynoJet.
I hope K1 C63's aren't dyno'ing that low.
Were you talking about dlbello's chart?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Probably because you can't dyno a stock C63 in 5th unless the speed limiter has been raised/deleted.Originally Posted by Sincity
I wonder why Cory told me that 4th gear is more accurate?
The only major point with dyno'ing a vehicle (IMHO) is be as consistent as possible. Meaning, if at all possible, same dyno, same operator, similar weather, same vehicle settings, same gear, etc. So, if you baseline in 4th, run your post-tune runs in 4th - don't switch to 5th just because now you can. Same issue with baselining at one shop and then getting post-mod data from another one - their dynos may be calibrated slightly differently, so it could over- or under-inflate the figures. Even just 2-3% different, you're talking being off by ~10 rwhp/rwtq.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Explore
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Quote:
i really don't know it was 91 octane.Originally Posted by Sincity
^^ Was that a 5th gear or 4th gear pull? What octane tune?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
The only major point with dyno'ing a vehicle (IMHO) is be as consistent as possible. Meaning, if at all possible, same dyno, same operator, similar weather, same vehicle settings, same gear, etc. So, if you baseline in 4th, run your post-tune runs in 4th - don't switch to 5th just because now you can. Same issue with baselining at one shop and then getting post-mod data from another one - their dynos may be calibrated slightly differently, so it could over- or under-inflate the figures. Even just 2-3% different, you're talking being off by ~10 rwhp/rwtq.
+1 My baseline file was saved in the dyno computer, all I have to do now is roll up and go.Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Probably because you can't dyno a stock C63 in 5th unless the speed limiter has been raised/deleted.The only major point with dyno'ing a vehicle (IMHO) is be as consistent as possible. Meaning, if at all possible, same dyno, same operator, similar weather, same vehicle settings, same gear, etc. So, if you baseline in 4th, run your post-tune runs in 4th - don't switch to 5th just because now you can. Same issue with baselining at one shop and then getting post-mod data from another one - their dynos may be calibrated slightly differently, so it could over- or under-inflate the figures. Even just 2-3% different, you're talking being off by ~10 rwhp/rwtq.
Super Member
Quote:
sure but i don't know how to upload a pic here.if u can tell me howOriginally Posted by dlbello
Sure send them to me...thanks
thanks
Former Vendor of MBWorld
That's a lot of HP from a Kleeman upgrade. Do you have the dyno sheets? My stock C63 dyno'd at 360HP and 361TQ on a DynoJet.
Super Member
Quote:
Numbers look just about the same as a K1 that was done here in California.
Don't want to just revive an old post but was the Singh tune more powerful than the K1 tune? Price being the same that's some important info!Originally Posted by James@ACGSD
Looking at your graph looks like you got whats expected from the tune, what we're your baseline TQ numbers if you dont mind me asking?Numbers look just about the same as a K1 that was done here in California.
thanks
Tags
3sautosport, auto, autosport, autosporteurorev, c63, ecu, eurorev, fasterjags, gains, gallery, k1, kleeman, singh, singhautosport, tune
Currently Active Users (1)
