AMG's new front rotor
I really think the Floating Rotor from a pure performance stand point is the better of the 2.
MNG explained the differences like this:
"Floating means when the pads are pressed the rotors can give either to the left or the right depending on pad pressure (providing a better more consistent grip). Where as non floating are solid and it relys on the pad on the left and the right of the rotor to spread the pressure."
Anyone else have thoughts or experience on this??
Last edited by NORTH 44 C63; Feb 9, 2010 at 09:42 AM.
I really think the Floating Rotor from a pure performance stand point is the better of the 2.
MNG explained the differences like this:
"Floating means when the pads are pressed the rotors can give either to the left or the right depending on pad pressure (providing a better more consistent grip). Where as non floating are solid and it relys on the pad on the left and the right of the rotor to spread the pressure."
Anyone else have thoughts or experience on this??
But they are very thick compare to regular one piece.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
This is on the amg microsite.
There was one guy on here that was complaining about the P30 brakes being inferior on the roadcourse, saying it ruined a set after 1 day, so he felt the non P30/PP version was better because of that. I believe he also complained of fade, which made zero sense.
I'll find out pretty quick when I track the car this summer. Our roadcourse here has a 1/2 mile straight, with an entry speed of around 70mph onto the straight, and a turn 1 speed of around 80mph, so the brakes will be well tested. Expecting the C63 to hit ~150-155mph before braking.




