C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Photos (Sneak Peak) :: Bolt-in Catless Down-Pipes / Test Pipes :: 2010 C63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 08:08 AM
  #51  
Dads C63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 14
From: Central Florida
2014 Audi RS7
Originally Posted by superlubricity
It is stupid loud . . . reminds me of avengerboater's car now.

Dyno, data-logging, 1/4-mile times and more coming tomorrow.
Now thats FUNNY!!!!!!
Isn't R&D work fun.
I think you could have probably bought some L/T headers by the time you paid for the PLM manifolds, GT Pro Single X-pipe, the custom exhaust and your time and efforts. Looks great though.
Good luck at the track tonight!! Keep us posted.

Last edited by Dads C63; Jul 21, 2010 at 08:12 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 12:41 PM
  #52  
AMS Performance's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 5
AMG
It would be a shame not to put an X-pipe in since it will improve both sound and power gains. Might as well put one in ....
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 12:53 PM
  #53  
Sincity's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,983
Likes: 21
From: Vegas and Vancouver, BC
.
Originally Posted by chubbs032
Subscribed, thanks superlubricity. Do you see your fabricator producing more of these after you've done all your fine tuning. Btw, I heard those vibrant resonators don't do much for sound, HF cats are probably the best of both worlds.
I had a 12" Vibrant resonator put in my '07 GTI with a catless DP. It toned down the raspiness and still allowed a free flow.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #54  
clkwork's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 4
CLK63 Black Series
Very, very cool stuff. If I were buying my car and money were no object I'd probably do the same. I ran my last car (c5 vette) with no mufflers for a long while and it was a blast.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 02:20 PM
  #55  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
Originally Posted by superlubricity
I'm going to start the car with the garage door closed tomorrow morning. That's the only data point I can share so far.
Hahahahahaahahahahaha!!!! I just about died reading that!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 02:23 PM
  #56  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
Originally Posted by Sincity
I had a 12" Vibrant resonator put in my '07 GTI with a catless DP. It toned down the raspiness and still allowed a free flow.
Turbo and Nat Asp exhausts have significantly different requirements and necessities. Lots of turbo guys (cars to trucks) just run straight pipe all the way back from the turbo and never have any issues with noise. My neighbor has a decent modified diesel truck with aforementioned straight shot exhaust, sucker is quieter than a stock E63 exhaust at idle part throttle and floored! The shameful part is it's also hella faster than my E...
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #57  
Sincity's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,983
Likes: 21
From: Vegas and Vancouver, BC
.
Originally Posted by RStevens63
Turbo and Nat Asp exhausts have significantly different requirements and necessities. Lots of turbo guys (cars to trucks) just run straight pipe all the way back from the turbo and never have any issues with noise. My neighbor has a decent modified diesel truck with aforementioned straight shot exhaust, sucker is quieter than a stock E63 exhaust at idle part throttle and floored! The shameful part is it's also hella faster than my E...
I understand that a turbo already muffles the sound a little. On that GTI exhaust, I already had a muffler in the rear, but, I prefer my 4-banger to be a little mellow and not sound like a ricer. I never had a V8 before. Do you think a straight-thru resonator will quiet things down a little with Super's setup?

I guess he could always re-install the GT-Pro X.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #58  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
Originally Posted by Sincity
I understand that a turbo already muffles the sound a little. On that GTI exhaust, I already had a muffler in the rear, but, I prefer my 4-banger to be a little mellow and not sound like a ricer. I never had a V8 before. Do you think a straight-thru resonator will quiet things down a little with Super's setup?

I guess he could always re-install the GT-Pro X.
I agree completely, nothing worse than a ricey 4 cylinder!No, you're also right that a resonator won't do much for an exhaust like this. High compression nat asp motors are just flat out loud when you decat them. Best solution will be cats but they will eat power, the Xpipe may change tone but won't do much of anything for volume. Either way sounds like Super has something in the works.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 01:55 AM
  #59  
superlubricity's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 6
From: USA
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Nothing terribly exciting to report. Sadly, conditions were a bit worse today on the dyno (compared to March) and there were not any measurable gains with the catless setup vs. my previous stock primaries plus X-pipe setup. We're still scratching our heads at this one.

There are also a couple fitment/clearance issues with the pipes that we'll need to tweak before I run them again. Previous setup is going back on so I can compare in this warm weather. I have some fresh track times from tonight to compare to next week.

One positive note. The O2 simulators are working perfectly. No CEL and as expected AFR is dialed in @ 12.5:1 @ 6,000 RPM. The ECU adapted nicely.

So that's it. No fancy write-up until I can get some more meaningful data.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 07:26 AM
  #60  
clktoc63's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
'09 C63 Performance Package - Steel Grey/Sahara Biege
[QUOTE=superlubricity;4169679]Nothing terribly exciting to report. Sadly, conditions were a bit worse today on the dyno (compared to March) and there were not any measurable gains with the catless setup vs. my previous stock primaries plus X-pipe setup. We're still scratching our heads at this one. QUOTE]

7:22am and I feel like someone crapped in my cornflakes.
...I'll eat around it though until the new results. Of all of the cars I've owned, this C63 is by FAR the most sensitive to warmer weather. My butt-dyno says the car is a slug lately.

Good luck...look forward to the comparisons!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 07:41 AM
  #61  
hhughes1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 3
From: Central Florida
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
[QUOTE=clktoc63;4169846]
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Nothing terribly exciting to report. Sadly, conditions were a bit worse today on the dyno (compared to March) and there were not any measurable gains with the catless setup vs. my previous stock primaries plus X-pipe setup. We're still scratching our heads at this one. QUOTE]

7:22am and I feel like someone crapped in my cornflakes.
...I'll eat around it though until the new results. Of all of the cars I've owned, this C63 is by FAR the most sensitive to warmer weather. My butt-dyno says the car is a slug lately.

Good luck...look forward to the comparisons!
A few trips to the drag strip last summer support what you are saying.

December 2009 mid 11's 121+ mph

July 2009 low 12's 117 mph

heat and humidity......nobody's friend
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 08:29 AM
  #62  
Ghostrider's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 4
From: KCMO, but Houston is my home.
01 CLK 430
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Nothing terribly exciting to report. Sadly, conditions were a bit worse today on the dyno (compared to March) and there were not any measurable gains with the catless setup vs. my previous stock primaries plus X-pipe setup. We're still scratching our heads at this one.

There are also a couple fitment/clearance issues with the pipes that we'll need to tweak before I run them again. Previous setup is going back on so I can compare in this warm weather. I have some fresh track times from tonight to compare to next week.

One positive note. The O2 simulators are working perfectly. No CEL and as expected AFR is dialed in @ 12.5:1 @ 6,000 RPM. The ECU adapted nicely.

So that's it. No fancy write-up until I can get some more meaningful data.
Does the ECU not need the usual 200 miles to fully adapt?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #63  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Nothing terribly exciting to report. Sadly, conditions were a bit worse today on the dyno (compared to March) and there were not any measurable gains with the catless setup vs. my previous stock primaries plus X-pipe setup. We're still scratching our heads at this one.

There are also a couple fitment/clearance issues with the pipes that we'll need to tweak before I run them again. Previous setup is going back on so I can compare in this warm weather. I have some fresh track times from tonight to compare to next week.

One positive note. The O2 simulators are working perfectly. No CEL and as expected AFR is dialed in @ 12.5:1 @ 6,000 RPM. The ECU adapted nicely.

So that's it. No fancy write-up until I can get some more meaningful data.
Good, bad, or indifferent, thanks for sharing!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #64  
AMS Performance's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 5
AMG
You need the X-pipe, put it in there and the gains should show up. Right now you don't have any crossover of any kind.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #65  
superlubricity's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 6
From: USA
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by AMS Performance
You need the X-pipe, put it in there and the gains should show up. Right now you don't have any crossover of any kind.
Interesting. You don't feel the crossover connecting the stock resonators is sufficient?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #66  
AMS Performance's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 5
AMG
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Interesting. You don't feel the crossover connecting the stock resonators is sufficient?
not at all, you need a true X-crossover for proper scavenging effects. The closer it is to the headers the better.

hope that helps,
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #67  
AMMO1000hp's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
C63
Super, I agree with AMS about the x-pipe. Granted I only eliminated the sec. cats but I did test out with and without an X. The first setup I tried was a decent X-pipe in their place. I then went with straight pipes and took the X out. I definitely noticed a slight drop in power so for the next setup, I went back to an X(nicer design) setup and got the power back. I realize this was not dyno verified but I did feel the difference. I wasn't able to spin the wheels up top like I did with the X-pipe setup. That was enough proof for me to come to this conclusion. Just my .02c


Anthony
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #68  
superlubricity's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 6
From: USA
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by AMS Performance
not at all, you need a true X-crossover for proper scavenging effects. The closer it is to the headers the better.

hope that helps,
It does help and thanks for the feedback.

I assumed the existing crossover tube in the resonators would serve the purpose. I can easily add my X-pipe into the system. I'll give it a shot.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #69  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
The primary purpose of using a crossover pipe be it H or X is to increase torque. Straight pipes without a crossover of any kind will still make the HP up top. From what I've seen people are making good power and torque with the factory resonator aka mini crossover H, that is to say the gains from adding an X pipe don't seem to do much, and those that delete the factory resonator crossover aren't going any faster than those that have them.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:39 PM
  #70  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
Originally Posted by AMMO1000hp
I realize this was not dyno verified but I did feel the difference. I wasn't able to spin the wheels up top like I did with the X-pipe setup. That was enough proof for me to come to this conclusion. Just my .02c


Anthony
No quantifiable before & after data?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:46 PM
  #71  
Sincity's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,983
Likes: 21
From: Vegas and Vancouver, BC
.
Originally Posted by AMS Performance
You need the X-pipe, put it in there and the gains should show up. Right now you don't have any crossover of any kind.
That makes sense because Super said he didn't notice any gains after he removed his old setup and install this new DP. He just equaled his power with the original setup (factory primaries and GT Pro X) using a DP only. Put the X back in, and you'll see the gains; even in this warmer weather since his last dyno.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:49 PM
  #72  
AMMO1000hp's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
C63
Originally Posted by RStevens63
No quantifiable before & after data?
No, sorry. I wish I did. I was planning to do so but I did all these setup winthin a few weeks time. As I stated, numbers/data is the best and only way to 100% confirm this but it was a noticeable difference not just the "butt dyno" deal. It was most noticeable by doing a rolling start then punching it. Spun the tires up top with the X setup and did not without it. Again you can take with a grain of salt but it was a noticeable difference to me.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:49 PM
  #73  
superlubricity's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 6
From: USA
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by Sincity
That makes sense because Super said he didn't notice any gains after he removed his old setup and install this new DP. He just equaled his power with the original setup (factory primaries and GT Pro X) using a DP only. Put the X back in, and you'll see the gains; even in this warmer weather since his last dyno.
It appears I was severely underestimating the benefit of scavenging. We'll see in a couple weeks. Going back to the track with the stock primaries + X-pipe first.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 04:52 PM
  #74  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
Originally Posted by AMMO1000hp
No, sorry. I wish I did. I was planning to do so but I did all these setup winthin a few weeks time. As I stated, numbers/data is the best and only way to 100% confirm this but it was a noticeable difference not just the "butt dyno" deal. It was most noticeable by doing a rolling start then punching it. Spun the tires up top with the X setup and did not without it. Again you can take with a grain of salt but it was a noticeable difference to me.
Understood and thank you for taking the time to post your feedback.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 05:06 PM
  #75  
AMMO1000hp's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
C63
Originally Posted by RStevens63
Understood and thank you for taking the time to post your feedback.
No problem. I was hesitant to post my experience due to the lack hard data/numbers. I am just anxious to see what kind of a difference it will make on a setup like Super's.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE