OE-tuning dyno #s
11-11-2010, 08:27 PM
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
BTW Atco is this month on the 22nd.Are you talking about Albert?
For the 10000 times. What correction?
11-11-2010, 08:32 PM
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Dynojet should give you the run files. You can download the software from their site and play with the data all you like. (Create your own charts ect)
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
11-11-2010, 08:33 PM
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
11-11-2010, 08:36 PM
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Dynojet should give you the run files. You can download the software from their site and play with the data all you like. (Create your own charts ect)
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
11-11-2010, 08:42 PM
#39
MBWorld Fanatic!
11-11-2010, 08:45 PM
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
11-12-2010, 10:53 AM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E63 AMG 2010, Black, Pano, P2
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
11-12-2010, 12:16 PM
#44
MBWorld Fanatic!
Hey Jon, you can't compare my E63 numbers to your numbers to prove that k&N/air mod argument. Also dont forget we are running different tranys as well, so cant compare these numbers the way you do. The only way to show is to dyno your car with and without the mods preferably on the same day, same dyno.
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
11-12-2010, 01:08 PM
#45
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 C63 AMG
11-12-2010, 02:27 PM
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E63 AMG 2010, Black, Pano, P2
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
11-12-2010, 07:01 PM
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Hey Jon, you can't compare my E63 numbers to your numbers to prove that k&N/air mod argument. Also dont forget we are running different tranys as well, so cant compare these numbers the way you do. The only way to show is to dyno your car with and without the mods preferably on the same day, same dyno.
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
11-12-2010, 07:07 PM
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
11-12-2010, 07:14 PM
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
