BTW Atco is this month on the 22nd.
OE-tuning dyno #s
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Are you talking about Albert?
For the 10000 times. What correction?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Dynojet should give you the run files. You can download the software from their site and play with the data all you like. (Create your own charts ect)
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 62
From: eNyCe
Steel Grey Metallic C63!!
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Dynojet should give you the run files. You can download the software from their site and play with the data all you like. (Create your own charts ect)
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
Correction means everything though. At STD correction my 5th run was 459whp 419 tq. At SAE 447whp 408 tq. SAE is the most common.
I hope I can make it to the track. If I cant get DR's by that time hopefully dodger will give us his so we can chase that 11.6!
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
E63 AMG 2010, Black, Pano, P2
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 2
From: NY
See Sig
Hey Jon, you can't compare my E63 numbers to your numbers to prove that k&N/air mod argument. Also dont forget we are running different tranys as well, so cant compare these numbers the way you do. The only way to show is to dyno your car with and without the mods preferably on the same day, same dyno.
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
'10 C63 AMG
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
E63 AMG 2010, Black, Pano, P2
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Hey Jon, you can't compare my E63 numbers to your numbers to prove that k&N/air mod argument. Also dont forget we are running different tranys as well, so cant compare these numbers the way you do. The only way to show is to dyno your car with and without the mods preferably on the same day, same dyno.
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
All you are showing is that my E63 and your C63 are putting down similar HP to the wheels. I cant show anything either since I don't have the baseline dyno before the mods and after the mods. So the whole point is mute.
But I can tell you that I did feel the difference in throttle response after the K&N and TTM airbox mode. That is all I can say.
BTW, did you find out if the numbers are SAE corrected or not?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
I was going to get into the E63, C63 last night but decided not to with him.
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
As I said before the only way to prove a point would be to swap out the filters and do a box mod and Dyno it again on the same day with the same conditions on the same dyno. I would put money on the C63 performing slightly better in HP and TQ.
I want to see his chart at this point. An answer is not good enough for me. I was to see the chart with the correction on it. Dynojet provides the run files and they are easily view on any home PC. The reason I want to see the chart is I know Jon and I know he will stop at nothing to be right.
Coming down Sunday Albert?
