OE-tuning dyno #s
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
OE-tuning dyno #s
Ok I just have the OE-tuning. Everything is stock-no airbox mod,stock filters,charcoals intact. The 432 max hp was done with a long cool down. But still operating temps.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Trending Topics
Hmm... I read a ton of posts with Dyno results for different ECU tunes, but the engine heat issue was brought up only in those with the OE tune. Is it just a coincidence or the OE tune does heat up the engine?
Why?
I've been running without charcoals for almost 5,000 miles.
The only problem I've ever had was a stuck purge valve
and the MB tech. said it was not related in any way.
Actually, the car is running really strong.
I've been running without charcoals for almost 5,000 miles.
The only problem I've ever had was a stuck purge valve
and the MB tech. said it was not related in any way.

Actually, the car is running really strong.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Well mine with the charcoals removed the Cel comes on. Now no problems.Also the dyno #s show..
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
No charcoals for me for 2K miles. No CEL. Also putting down much more torque than you and more HP.

Now Dyno it with the charcoals removed and K&N's and the air box mod done if you wanted to prove a point. Without that other test you proved nothing.

Also a weak chart. Show me the chart showing the correction. What correction is that showing? The 2010 is putting down more HP and torque though. This proves it.
Nice numbers though.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
No charcoals for me for 2K miles. No CEL. Also putting down much more torque than you and more HP. 
Now Dyno it with the charcoals removed and K&N's and the air box mod done if you wanted to prove a point. Without that other test you proved nothing.
Also a weak chart. Show me the chart showing the correction. What correction is that showing? The 2010 is putting down more HP and torque though. This proves it.
Nice numbers though.

Now Dyno it with the charcoals removed and K&N's and the air box mod done if you wanted to prove a point. Without that other test you proved nothing.

Also a weak chart. Show me the chart showing the correction. What correction is that showing? The 2010 is putting down more HP and torque though. This proves it.
Nice numbers though.
We should touch the charcoals because theres no point in them being there. if the ROW doesn't need them, we shouldn't either
btw ice packs in between runs is as natural as nitrous
btw ice packs in between runs is as natural as nitrous
Last edited by GHAZAN; Nov 11, 2010 at 08:04 PM.
Cooled between runs with ice. First run was after 25 mile drive in 70 degree weather 100% humidity with very little cool down in the wrong gear. 5th and final run was full cooldown (using ice) in 5th gear putting down 447whp and 408 torque SAE corrected. Only 900 miles also.
What correction are you showing us? How about a better chart.
Your torque curve looks nice, but your HP curve is spikey.. sup with that? What gear were you in?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Cooled between runs with ice. First run was after 25 mile drive in 70 degree weather 100% humidity with very little cool down in the wrong gear. 5th and final run was full cooldown (using ice) in 5th gear putting down 447whp and 408 torque SAE corrected. Only 900 miles also.
What correction are you showing us? How about a better chart.
Your torque curve looks nice, but your HP curve is spikey.. sup with that? What gear were you in?
What correction are you showing us? How about a better chart.
Your torque curve looks nice, but your HP curve is spikey.. sup with that? What gear were you in?
https://mbworld.org/forums/4254088-post19.html
Again..... What correction are you showing us? Put up a better chart since I know you are trying to prove a point.
I thought MIR was the 22nd... If its ATCO I think I might be able to make it.
Just gotta drop 100 lb's before then for a fair race. 
Nice numbers though. Go OE!
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Seem high?
https://mbworld.org/forums/4254088-post19.html
Again..... What correction are you showing us? Put up a better chart since I know you are trying to prove a point.
I thought MIR was the 22nd... If its ATCO I think I might be able to make it.
Just gotta drop 100 lb's before then for a fair race. 
Nice numbers though. Go OE!
https://mbworld.org/forums/4254088-post19.html
Again..... What correction are you showing us? Put up a better chart since I know you are trying to prove a point.
I thought MIR was the 22nd... If its ATCO I think I might be able to make it.
Just gotta drop 100 lb's before then for a fair race. 
Nice numbers though. Go OE!

Very common at the track to use ice between runs to cool down a car doing runs in quick succession..


