Before - After Comparison - C63 dropped on H&R Springs
Here are some before and after photos of the drop. Keep in mind this is fresh after the install prior to any settling. We like the drop

Trending Topics
I'm not sure what kind of archaic dealership you go to, but MB of Walnut Creek does laser alignment.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Haven't done a track day so my experience is only on the streets.
As you are used to do alignments, would you be able to tell if H&R springs would keep the factory rake and if so, what that would be ?
Thank you for your input.
as for camber settings, most Mercedes have no adjustment for camber in rear. Just toe. You are stuck with the camber gain you get after lowering. The car is scheduled to come back next week for an aligment. If you guys are interested, I can post up the #'s as well as take measurements of fender height at each corner.
Mike
Last edited by AdvancePerformance; May 12, 2012 at 12:03 AM.
as for camber settings, most Mercedes have no adjustment for camber in rear. Just toe. You are stuck with the camber gain you get after lowering. The car is scheduled to come back next week for an aligment. If you guys are interested, I can post up the #'s as well as take measurements of fender height at each corner.
Mike
If a C63 has no rear camber adjustment, and you end up with so much negative camber that you start eating the inside edge of the tires (like these cars need more help eating rear tires) what are your options:
1. Adjustable upper links (dog bones).
2. Symmetrical tires and swap have them remounted side to side every few thousand miles
as for camber settings, most Mercedes have no adjustment for camber in rear. Just toe. You are stuck with the camber gain you get after lowering. The car is scheduled to come back next week for an aligment. If you guys are interested, I can post up the #'s as well as take measurements of fender height at each corner.
Mike
thank you for taking your time to respond. You're 100% correct that the alignment as good as the person who does it.
So with no rear adjustment, we already have a problem, I'll put the car on the lift next week and check the suspension design, to verify if the camber is controlled by upper control arms (which it shouldn't) or by the lower control arm.
The reason why it shouldn't be controlled by the upper arms is that changing the length of the upper arm, you will change the dynamic adjustment of the suspension. By that I mean, by the time it compresses and decompress.
Duane, I understand you asking about the upper control arms (dog bones) on a porsche, but if you compensate camber using those, that's not the correct way to do. You should use the Porsche Motorsports lower control arms, which are divided, and use the lower shims to do so.
Your alignment is only as good as the person who does that, but a proper string alignment, which is proper way to do, just a lot more time consuming and also expensive, every time the equipment is set up, it also needs to be calibrated, so you don't run the same problem as major places like dealerships, by your equipment being out of specs. Also dealerships only care about putting the car into specs, and not being accurate from side to side, in every adjustment.
thank you for taking your time to respond. You're 100% correct that the alignment as good as the person who does it.
So with no rear adjustment, we already have a problem, I'll put the car on the lift next week and check the suspension design, to verify if the camber is controlled by upper control arms (which it shouldn't) or by the lower control arm.
The reason why it shouldn't be controlled by the upper arms is that changing the length of the upper arm, you will change the dynamic adjustment of the suspension. By that I mean, by the time it compresses and decompress.
Duane, I understand you asking about the upper control arms (dog bones) on a porsche, but if you compensate camber using those, that's not the correct way to do. You should use the Porsche Motorsports lower control arms, which are divided, and use the lower shims to do so.
Excellent suggestion re the Motorsports control arms. We tried those first but even with no shims in them they still left me with -2.2 degrees in the back and too much toe in that the stock eccentrics could not compensate for. Its great for track work but destroys rear tires on the street. (esp with 315's in the back). So I left them in and added rear dog bones with adjustable toe steer links which gives me a lot of adjustment and really stiffened lateral movement in the back end (along stiffer motor mounts).
Last edited by DuaneC63; May 13, 2012 at 02:14 AM.
If a C63 has no rear camber adjustment, and you end up with so much negative camber that you start eating the inside edge of the tires (like these cars need more help eating rear tires) what are your options:
1. Adjustable upper links (dog bones).
2. Symmetrical tires and swap have them remounted side to side every few thousand miles
Please keep in mind I am answering over the weekend and have not talked to my alignment tech to confirm 100% that the C63 has no camber in rear, but that is the norm now for Mercedes. I am pretty sure the case is the same for C63. As you stated, changing a control arm to add camber adjust ability or swapping tires side to side are the only two options. We do the latter and pull out some of the extreme to in that comes from factory. A lot of these cars (different models not specifically C63AMG) spec +25 to +30. This is to help stability at super high speeds and help flatten out wear pattern due to high negative camber, but accelerates total overall wear. We usually pull out some toe (shoot for +15) and recommend flip flop tires at 8-10k. Having directional or symmetrical tires is needed.
Also the wider the tire the less camber you need. This is the exact opposite of what usually takes place. Most people lower after getting new/wider wheels and tires. Everyone should really complain to Mercedes for not having camber adjustment in rear. Everyone else does.
mike
Last edited by AdvancePerformance; May 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM.
Excellent suggestion re the Motorsports control arms. We tried those first but even with no shims in them they still left me with -2.2 degrees in the back and too much toe in that the stock eccentrics could not compensate for. Its great for track work but destroys rear tires on the street. (esp with 315's in the back). So I left them in and added rear dog bones with adjustable toe steer links which gives me a lot of adjustment and really stiffened lateral movement in the back end (along stiffer motor mounts).
For example I run -1.8 in the rear, using toyo RA-1 tires (335/30-18), and 2mm of toe in.
Just be careful not to run the car too low if keeping the pick up points in the suspension stock, this will change the kinematics in the suspension by a fair lot.
If so, we might have a solution (would have to present the idea to him first to make sure he wants to take on the project)
There's a guy on the Crossfire forums (MikeR) that has built camber bars, adjustable links, the whole nine. HIGH quality stuff and very inexpensive, no Mercedes Tax. He might need an OEM C63 bar for mock-up, but I'm sure he could work something out for you all. He also makes adjustable sway-bar links so the sway-bar isn't pre-loaded... makes a HUGE difference on the lowered Crossfires, as the suspension is allowed full articulation as if it were at factory height.
-2.2° camber in the rear is a tire-killer for sure.

Here's a link for a preview, you guys let me know your thoughts?
http://www.crossfireforum.org/forum/...-hardware.html



