EAS's Dyno Sheet: My M5, C63 Black Series, E63TT with PP- same dyno different days




All three cars were done on different days but the conditions were relatively similar. Tom, co owner, was kind enough to do an overlay of the 3 cars for perspective. Keep in mind that the cars being done on different days will yield different results but arguably they wont differ too much.
I thought it would be cool to see where the sweet spots are on each car vs each other. I have had 2 M157 PP engines so I know what they are capable of but with all due respect stock vs stock my M5 beats the CLS and E63TT's that I had. My Black is lower on the power list but weighs less and that makes up the gap.
The cars:
2013 F10 m5
2012 C63 Black Series
2012 E63TT with the PP
All cars are stock.
This first dyno sheet shows the power with mph vs rpm's. Check out the Black's power (hp) curve vs the M5--- similar in shape just lower on the spectrum. Ill have an RPM overlay done soon. Thanks again to Tom and team at EAS (European Auto Source). These are all SAE corrected numbers.

Here is the same overlay with RPM's
Last edited by Vic55; Jan 8, 2013 at 07:29 PM.
On that note. How would you compare the 997 vs the F10? I know two completely different animal and also stock vs mod but would you say the 997 is still king in acceleration?
Great dyno comparison!








The M5 is certainly strong in the top end.

Thanks for getting the cars on the dyno and for sharing the results.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




The E63 would pull the CBS up top... down low it would be close up to about 100 IMHO. The CBS has the weight advantage and having owned 2 M157's its more difficult to launch with the factor lsd that only has a 30% lockup versus the CBS's 60%. The M5 has an active diff so the lockup varies based on conditions- this is a great btw.
Here is vdubpowers car at the very dyno:

BMW definitely went a different route with the S63TU engine... I love that its so responsive down low. Add in the DCT benefits and the car is fantastic but also a big pig at almost 4300 lbs.
Last edited by Vic55; Jan 9, 2013 at 12:28 AM.
I think you might be a good one to ask a couple of questions.
I have been strongly pondering moving to the newer platforms with the 5.5TT, (new)4.0TT, or something with two extra cylinders.

I wonder how a C63 like mine with heads, cams, and headers will compare on the road due to the weight and tranny differences?? I only have 520rwhp (N/A) so I'm a little short of what the M5 has. I wonder if the weight differential will allow me to stay with this group? I weigh in at about 3700# in street form now without driver.

You've driven them all, what do you think?




I think you might be a good one to ask a couple of questions.
I have been strongly pondering moving to the newer platforms with the 5.5TT, (new)4.0TT, or something with two extra cylinders.

I wonder how a C63 like mine with heads, cams, and headers will compare on the road due to the weight and tranny differences?? I only have 520rwhp (N/A) so I'm a little short of what the M5 has. I wonder if the weight differential will allow me to stay with this group? I weigh in at about 3700# in street form now without driver.

You've driven them all, what do you think?
Ill tell you this- I havent driven my CBS in a few weeks and have driven it 3 days in a row this week and Id much rather lose in this car than have most faster cars out there (I said most). The car is just inspiring and fawking fun.
The thing about TT motors is they are so stupid easy to mod. I did tunes on both my M157's and the cars were completely different animals and it would not be unlikely to see 126mph trap speeds in those modded cars at the strip. So now I wait for the tune on the M5 which should be out this month or early next (OBDII) and then that car with its smaller displacement (vs the M157) but bigger turbos will be a monster. And then there are downpipes, intake, etc and these cars are in the 130's.
Last edited by Vic55; Jan 9, 2013 at 10:55 AM.
Ill tell you this- I havent driven my CBS in a few weeks and have driven it 3 days in a row this week and Id much rather lose in this car than have most faster cars out there (I said most). The car is just inspiring and fawking fun.
The thing about TT motors is they are so stupid easy to mod. I did tunes on both my M157's and the cars were completely different animals and it would not be unlikely to see 126mph trap speeds in those modded cars at the strip. So now I wait for the tune on the M5 which should be out this month or early next (OBDII) and then that car with its smaller displacement (vs the M157) but bigger turbos will be a monster.
Thanks for your honest input.
If I were to move into another platform what would you suggest?? I actually like all the cars in your stable including the Porsche and GT-R so recommend away.

What about the new E63 5.5TT with some new down pipes, exhaust, tune etc.....? or do you recommend the CLS?
Last edited by Dads C63; Jan 9, 2013 at 10:55 AM.




Thanks for your honest input.
If I were to move into another platform what would you suggest?? I actually like all the cars in your stable including the Porsche and GT-R so recommend away.

What about the new E63 5.5TT with some new down pipes, exhaust, tune etc.....? or do you recommend the CLS?
The 997.2TT has a tune and exhaust its faster than a stock turbo S- and out of the gate is just stupid--- mid 2's zero to 60 but the AWD system in the turbo even with the PDK robs its power up top and you can feel it get slugish past 160 mph (Im able to get to these speeds daily where I live in Mexico). But its the best stop light racer I have right now and passing from 60 to 120 is incredible in this car. Its also a 150k car so its overpriced.
I think if you want luxury, speed, and power and a drag strip king you go with the E63TT and do the mods to get you over 130mph in the traps. It is a basic looking car to me- the W212 is so not "look at me" vs the likes of the GTR or the CBS. If you want to add in a little panache then the CLS is a great car- sexy as all hell and you can get it almost as fast as an E (weight).
If cost is an issue the E is the best bang for the buck along with the GTR but the GTR is just not a daily driver for me.
But like above I love the CBS and its freaking stock!!! Im sure if you got a hold of CBS you would mod it and make faster than an SLS.
The 997.2TT has a tune and exhaust its faster than a stock turbo S- and out of the gate is just stupid--- mid 2's zero to 60 but the AWD system in the turbo even with the PDK robs its power up top and you can feel it get slugish past 160 mph (Im able to get to these speeds daily where I live in Mexico). But its the best stop light racer I have right now and passing from 60 to 120 is incredible in this car. Its also a 150k car so its overpriced.
I think if you want luxury, speed, and power and a drag strip king you go with the E63TT and do the mods to get you over 130mph in the traps. It is a basic looking car to me- the W212 is so not "look at me" vs the likes of the GTR or the CBS. If you want to add in a little panache then the CLS is a great car- sexy as all hell and you can get it almost as fast as an E (weight).
If cost is an issue the E is the best bang for the buck along with the GTR but the GTR is just not a daily driver for me.
But like above I love the CBS and its freaking stock!!! Im sure if you got a hold of CBS you would mod it and make faster than an SLS.

I think that based on what you are saying my best option is to keep my modded C63 and use it as a track/car show car. Then look for something more refined(streetable) like the 997.2TT or the E63 to drive daily and play with.




How about a CTS-V? It's not a Benz but it's easily modded and much cheaper to mod too.
Intake, tune and upper pulley puts you about 530 to 550rwhp in an auto and 550 to 570rwhp with a manual.
Add a lower pulley, cam, heat exchanger and retune and your pushing 650whp.
Many good tuners down in Florida too.
This proves that the M5 hp is way underrated. It looks like at least 610 crank power which explains your statement that a stock M5 beats a E/CLS63PP.
MB probably knew this and that is the reason why they have upped the power of the redesigned base E63 and PP.
I can't wait to see what a tune on the M5 can do.
Aren't we living in a great decade or what? Manufacturers are producing 4 door sedans with the performance of supercars of the 80s. And since we live in the US, it is not reserved for the super elite
.




Either way a great comparison OP.
R.K.
The E63 would pull the CBS up top... down low it would be close up to about 100 IMHO. The CBS has the weight advantage and having owned 2 M157's its more difficult to launch with the factor lsd that only has a 30% lockup versus the CBS's 60%. The M5 has an active diff so the lockup varies based on conditions- this is a great btw.
Here is vdubpowers car at the very dyno:

BMW definitely went a different route with the S63TU engine... I love that its so responsive down low. Add in the DCT benefits and the car is fantastic but also a big pig at almost 4300 lbs.

Hmmm you need to throw on a good pair of headers on that c63BS with a tune and see how she runs against these cars hehe would love to see how you compare the m5 with your new tune vs your 2 tuned m157's. I didnt know that the m5 had bigger turbos that could make it interesting the boost now adays has made the statement no replacement for displacement obsolete !
But just thinking out loud here i think ive seen tune only renntech m157's push ~600whp and ~700Wtq. Its obvious the m157 makes its power by big torque and the s63tu wouldnt touch the torque number tuned but then bmw brings in the bigger turbos trick cross manifold and higher rev limiter so that 600whp isnt impossible. SICK collection of cars btw
Thanks for a GREAT thread with some easy to see, factual, interesting,& easy to understand, information.
Thanks, Pickles.





Hmmm you need to throw on a good pair of headers on that c63BS with a tune and see how she runs against these cars hehe would love to see how you compare the m5 with your new tune vs your 2 tuned m157's. I didnt know that the m5 had bigger turbos that could make it interesting the boost now adays has made the statement no replacement for displacement obsolete !
But just thinking out loud here i think ive seen tune only renntech m157's push ~600whp and ~700Wtq. Its obvious the m157 makes its power by big torque and the s63tu wouldnt touch the torque number tuned but then bmw brings in the bigger turbos trick cross manifold and higher rev limiter so that 600whp isnt impossible. SICK collection of cars btw


I agree with you; headers on the M156 CBS would change things- I just dont feel the need to adjust this car ... yet. But Id love to see those numbers and results on the street no doubt
My tune only M157's were around 560 hp but on a super low reader dyno dynamics. Im not sure about the Renntech ones but Xtyper (member here) was around 580 hp on a local dyno (non dyno dynamics) without race gas I think. They are great cars but I like to think some other things do come into play most noteworthy is that DCT tranny. Its so good at getting the power to the street and the speed of shifts is incredible. Of course other items like weight, gearing, COed, etc also create advantages and disadvantages.
I appreciate the post.
Last edited by C63fan; Jan 13, 2013 at 07:54 PM.






