C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

9x18 et45 front, 10,5x18 et60 rear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-26-2013 | 10:32 PM
  #1  
wahlsten's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
C 63 AMG
9x18 et45 front, 10,5x18 et60 rear?

9x18 et45 with 260/660-18 front, 10,5x18 et60 with 280/660-18 rear?

Does it work?

Or what offset should i go with?
Old 09-27-2013 | 01:44 AM
  #2  
Roswell's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,860
Likes: 39
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
2010 C63 AMG, 2009 ISF , 2002 L-Tuned IS300, 2011 ML350
I would say the front should work with 18x9 +45mm (not sure about running 260/60/18 though.. Sounds meaty to me).

The rear might be a problem 18x10.5 +60mm should work in theory, but in real life they might have a big chance of rubbing the inner suspension if u are lowered. Again 280/60/18 sounds like a very odd size. I would suggest u 285/35/18.
Old 09-27-2013 | 02:14 AM
  #3  
wahlsten's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
C 63 AMG
The tires is DTM racing slicks 260/660-18 and 280/660-18
Old 09-27-2013 | 02:19 AM
  #4  
wahlsten's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
C 63 AMG
its not profile in % its 660 mm total high if the tire stand on the ground!
Old 09-27-2013 | 10:25 AM
  #5  
Roswell's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,860
Likes: 39
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
2010 C63 AMG, 2009 ISF , 2002 L-Tuned IS300, 2011 ML350
I see, but i still think your 18x10.5 +60mm will touch the inner suspension... maybe +55 would be ideal.
Old 09-27-2013 | 12:46 PM
  #6  
Mort's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,520
Likes: 435
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
I think the 660 height may be too much. 650 would be better if available. I am running a 245/35/19 on the front (~ 655) and it rubs the inner fender liner on the left front.

Roswell is correct that an ET60 on the rear with a 10.5 wheel will likely rub on the inner suspension.

Your widths of 260 and 280 will be very close as well if they don't rub the fenders.
Old 09-27-2013 | 12:54 PM
  #7  
Diabolis's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,731
Likes: 799
From: Toronto, Canada
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
Like Roswell said, probably it will rub - not only because of the rear rim width and offset but also because the 660 mm metric tires are about 1" larger overall in diameter than the OEM size on the C63. Add to that the fact that racing slicks usually run fatter than their street counterparts of the same size and chances are you'll be rubbing.

If you're not lowered, 260 width on the front should be fine on a 9" wide rim (no issues running 255s on the front on a car with the AMG sport suspension).
Old 09-29-2013 | 10:20 AM
  #8  
wahlsten's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
C 63 AMG
Hmm, ok

I have H&R Coilovers, max drop rear and 2cm from max drop front right now.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 9x18 et45 front, 10,5x18 et60 rear?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:49 PM.