M3/M4's making some big power
Banned
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 7
C63 AMG
The m4 is not faster 0-60 about even
You'll find sub 4 sec tines for both
Same as 0-150 which is a better test
The m4 is not a better car
The c63 is not a better car
They are different cars of equal speed
Newer technology? Lol
Turbos have been arount for a while
The point is despite being 6-7 year newer technology, as you put it, it is no faster
They are within a std dev the same
It's easy to admit when a car is 'better' wetf that means
The audi s6 and s8 are better than both
So is the e63
And the porsche turbo
But not the m4
You'll find sub 4 sec tines for both
Same as 0-150 which is a better test
The m4 is not a better car
The c63 is not a better car
They are different cars of equal speed
Newer technology? Lol
Turbos have been arount for a while
The point is despite being 6-7 year newer technology, as you put it, it is no faster
They are within a std dev the same
It's easy to admit when a car is 'better' wetf that means
The audi s6 and s8 are better than both
So is the e63
And the porsche turbo
But not the m4
The M4 is faster 0to60
Why did you mention 0-150? Is that the only section the c63 wins?
25 years is a long time to wise up . Must have been some bad cars those BMW's
E65 is faster than an M4? Is that supposed to tell anyone anything?
Guess what an M5 is faster than a c63 on the ring.
Compare apples with apples.
I guess what ever you own at the moment is the best car in its class.
It's tough to admit that the M4 is the better car which it should be using newer technology.
Why did you mention 0-150? Is that the only section the c63 wins?
25 years is a long time to wise up . Must have been some bad cars those BMW's
E65 is faster than an M4? Is that supposed to tell anyone anything?
Guess what an M5 is faster than a c63 on the ring.
Compare apples with apples.
I guess what ever you own at the moment is the best car in its class.
It's tough to admit that the M4 is the better car which it should be using newer technology.
Last edited by Ingenieur; Oct 10, 2014 at 08:54 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Canada
2006 BMW 330i, 2009 C63
The m4 is not faster 0-60 about even
You'll find sub 4 sec tines for both
Same as 0-150 which is a better test
The m4 is not a better car
The c63 is not a better car
They are different cars of equal speed
Newer technology? Lol
Turbos have been arount for a while
The point is despite being 6-7 year newer technology, as you put it, it is no faster
They are within a std dev the same
It's easy to admit when a car is 'better' wetf that means
The audi s6 and s8 are better than both
So is the e63
And the porsche turbo
But not the m4
You'll find sub 4 sec tines for both
Same as 0-150 which is a better test
The m4 is not a better car
The c63 is not a better car
They are different cars of equal speed
Newer technology? Lol
Turbos have been arount for a while
The point is despite being 6-7 year newer technology, as you put it, it is no faster
They are within a std dev the same
It's easy to admit when a car is 'better' wetf that means
The audi s6 and s8 are better than both
So is the e63
And the porsche turbo
But not the m4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 7
C63 AMG
Do you care?
I don't really dream about cars, there always was, and always will be good ones
I do care when bs is spewed as fact
The m4 does not make 501 hp and 505 lb ft
That is unadultered nonsense
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,229
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
I'm pretty sure my //M-Toro makes 5 hp and it's the best mulcher in it's class... Just sayin
Banned
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 7
C63 AMG
C63 have done same on race gas
It looks like 119 is the limit
C's have run 120-121 stock pump gas
