M3/M4's making some big power
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
M3/M4's making some big power
Interesting to see with fairly little mods the M3/M4's are making well over 500+ WHP / TQ. The EAS car (Yellow) is making damn near 600 TQ.
http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1043129
Gotta give credit where due, those are fantastic numbers for relatively little mods (filters / catted down pipes / exhaust and tune!)
Interesting to say the least. W204 owners may have to be SC'd just to keep up with these bad boys.
http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1043129
Gotta give credit where due, those are fantastic numbers for relatively little mods (filters / catted down pipes / exhaust and tune!)
Interesting to say the least. W204 owners may have to be SC'd just to keep up with these bad boys.
#4
That's pretty impressive!
I glanced at the M cars before going c63 but I just preferred the look and sound of the c63 beast
But those gains the m3/4 get from even just a tune may be food for thought come next purchase time
I glanced at the M cars before going c63 but I just preferred the look and sound of the c63 beast
But those gains the m3/4 get from even just a tune may be food for thought come next purchase time
#5
Senior Member
Seen the videos the other day, impressive. All those cars running on JB4 Map 7 is on E85 mix, 100+ octane, or a combo of both, none of them is running CA 91 gas. The yellow M4 is on 100 octane for sure
#6
the new R&T
M4 ran 12.4/115
Motor Trend the e63 was faster around VIR than the M4
it weighed 700 lbs more lol
Just think what the new C63 will get
it has a huge head start
33% more dispacement
higher compression
better intercooling
it should be a 750/800 machine if the M4 numbers are to be believed
but they are not
M4 ran 12.4/115
Motor Trend the e63 was faster around VIR than the M4
it weighed 700 lbs more lol
Just think what the new C63 will get
it has a huge head start
33% more dispacement
higher compression
better intercooling
it should be a 750/800 machine if the M4 numbers are to be believed
but they are not
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
These numbers are on a JB4 map 7. So high boost and timing to compensate for race fuel. I highly doubt these guys are running those tunes on the street. Especially on stock turbos.
Either way, I want to see a reliable street tune to see what they can actually do.
Either way, I want to see a reliable street tune to see what they can actually do.
Trending Topics
#9
Super Member
its well known that EAS's dyno reads a bit high....
Still, great numbers for a Inline-6. Like most people have said I cant wait to get myself a tuned/dp/E85 4.0 TT C63
Still, great numbers for a Inline-6. Like most people have said I cant wait to get myself a tuned/dp/E85 4.0 TT C63
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
the new R&T
M4 ran 12.4/115
Motor Trend the e63 was faster around VIR than the M4
it weighed 700 lbs more lol
Just think what the new C63 will get
it has a huge head start
33% more dispacement
higher compression
better intercooling
it should be a 750/800 machine if the M4 numbers are to be believed
but they are not
M4 ran 12.4/115
Motor Trend the e63 was faster around VIR than the M4
it weighed 700 lbs more lol
Just think what the new C63 will get
it has a huge head start
33% more dispacement
higher compression
better intercooling
it should be a 750/800 machine if the M4 numbers are to be believed
but they are not
#11
Member
Sounds like a sneezing horse but certainly goes like stink. We did 12.1 @ 119 and a 3.9 0-60 time in the manual. Feels about as fast as a tuned C63 but far more sterile to drive all-around. Shame, too, since it looks sick.
#12
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 142
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C6 Z06, 997 C2S
Hopefully the shop car (yellow M4) will back up its numbers with the "right" trap speed.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
So what are these cars making with street tunes? Seems some of you are aware of these cars can make with a reliable tune and pump gas.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
pump gas... 480/484 according to burger tuning. And that's to the wheels.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
My friend is running 11.9 in his stock m4 so yeah, its a fast car.
#19
Member
I like the car personally. I still have to wait and see if the TT V8 C63S Coupe hits next year. If its not out by the last quarter of 15', I will have to seriously look at the M4.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Butt dyno also wont help you when a tuned m4 starts pulling away from you. If you're stock that is...
As for the exhaust... Downpipes can give turbo cars huge gains. Such as, oh I don't know, that 5.5 biturbo gem that is in the CLS/E63 right now.
As for the exhaust... Downpipes can give turbo cars huge gains. Such as, oh I don't know, that 5.5 biturbo gem that is in the CLS/E63 right now.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Base models (I know who cars) but the c class is far better than a base 3 series.
Furthermore, they aren't really catching up. IMO everyone stayed put. M3/M4 can get around a circuit more quickly and is a more serious car. The C63 is just the hey I'm here having almost too much fun and will most likely still win out in a straight line battle mod for mod.
Everyone (BMW/MB) has been remaining their course...
Audi on the other hand, those sneaky ****** have been doing some good work over there lately.
#23
Crank 15% losses 565 hp / 570 lb ft from 3 liter
That is >30 psi of boost at its stock comp ratio
And eff comp ratio of 30:1
Specific output of 3.1 hp / in^3
#25