C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tuned/PP C63 vs. 2015 M3/M4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-21-2015, 11:15 PM
  #76  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
solekeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
A V8
Originally Posted by Spazdoc
I do not disagree with personal experience, but a 20-30 min test drive on side streets and highways near a dealer are not quite the best crucible for these cars. A C63 sedan without PP died on me last year (had to be towed back) and procrastinated my purchase until the F80 M3 came out, but my dealer (or a couple nearby) does not have a DCT M3 or M4 to flog. I will admit that I was able to test out a C63 coupe with PP today, and it felt much better than the standard C63, which did not feel significantly better than my 335 with a tune.


335 is a pos compared to the m156.

n54/n55 are both garbage.
Old 03-26-2015, 03:05 AM
  #77  
Member
 
Properstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Miami florida
Posts: 110
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2010 C63 AMG, 2009 M3 DCT, 1994 slicktop 2jz swapped 300z
My buddy has a F80 m3 with down pipes no tune., I just happen to havea tuned only c63 sedan 2010,

when he and I ran at a 40 with me in manual mode he pulled 2 cars nothing I could do to shorten it.

when we later ran at a local track event from a 40 with me in S1 auto I stayed a fender ahead of him the whole race. it literally came down to who ever hit it first. BTW my car in renntech tuned.
Old 03-26-2015, 11:06 AM
  #78  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CarHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 6,358
Received 884 Likes on 619 Posts
E63S | X5
Originally Posted by solekeeper
335 is a pos compared to the m156.

n54/n55 are both garbage.
Haha gtfo. Don't you bring the n54 into that convo. Have you even ever had one?

Yeah, forged block from factory that can easily handle 700whp and with a tune/downpipes... My 135i would most likely give the c63 a run for it's money and for about half if not 1/3 the cost.

Please tell me you've had an n54 and you aren't just bashing away
Old 03-26-2015, 11:16 AM
  #79  
Member
 
Properstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Miami florida
Posts: 110
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2010 C63 AMG, 2009 M3 DCT, 1994 slicktop 2jz swapped 300z
Originally Posted by PurpleHeartAMG
Haha gtfo. Don't you bring the n54 into that convo. Have you even ever had one?

Yeah, forged block from factory that can easily handle 700whp and with a tune/downpipes... My 135i would most likely give the c63 a run for it's money and for about half if not 1/3 the cost.

Please tell me you've had an n54 and you aren't just bashing away
unless you are on e85 it's not happening. done that race already. tuned only c63 againist a pump gas 335 and 135i and walked them both, now if they are on e85 thats a different story.
Old 03-26-2015, 11:34 AM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
Spazdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 306
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
C63S, 2004 S4, 2001 S4 Avant
Wow, did not mean to bring out the trolls. My comment was more to get the opinions of owners the F80 and W204 - the test drive is not the best environment to appreciate the full range of a vehicle, especially ones that require higher RPM (ie E90/E92 M3).

Coming from a tuned 335i, which has most of its torque available at low RPMs, I had a hard time appreciating the base C63 before it broke down on test drive lest year. And if you are only walking a 335/135 with a tuned C63, then it can't be that much of a POS...

Now, I ended up buying a C63 with P31, so I guess I am a convert.
Old 03-26-2015, 04:25 PM
  #81  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
solekeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
A V8
Originally Posted by PurpleHeartAMG
Haha gtfo. Don't you bring the n54 into that convo. Have you even ever had one?

Yeah, forged block from factory that can easily handle 700whp and with a tune/downpipes... My 135i would most likely give the c63 a run for it's money and for about half if not 1/3 the cost.

Please tell me you've had an n54 and you aren't just bashing away

had n54. i wish i would've drove it into a wall sooner.
Old 03-26-2015, 05:37 PM
  #82  
Super Member
 
xxaarraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 787
Received 66 Likes on 37 Posts
Multiple
Originally Posted by Spazdoc
Wow, did not mean to bring out the trolls. My comment was more to get the opinions of owners the F80 and W204 - the test drive is not the best environment to appreciate the full range of a vehicle, especially ones that require higher RPM (ie E90/E92 M3).

Coming from a tuned 335i, which has most of its torque available at low RPMs, I had a hard time appreciating the base C63 before it broke down on test drive lest year. And if you are only walking a 335/135 with a tuned C63, then it can't be that much of a POS...

Now, I ended up buying a C63 with P31, so I guess I am a convert.
All this talk of "base C63" is very amusing. A V8 with 450/440 feels slower to you than a 335i? You risk losing all credibility by making statements like that. That's like saying "I thought the 'base' Ferrari was slower than my tuned WRX STI, so I went and got the Scuderia" Pretty funny.

Last edited by xxaarraa; 03-26-2015 at 05:40 PM.
Old 03-26-2015, 08:54 PM
  #83  
Senior Member
 
Spazdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 306
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
C63S, 2004 S4, 2001 S4 Avant
Originally Posted by xxaarraa
All this talk of "base C63" is very amusing. A V8 with 450/440 feels slower to you than a 335i? You risk losing all credibility by making statements like that. That's like saying "I thought the 'base' Ferrari was slower than my tuned WRX STI, so I went and got the Scuderia" Pretty funny.
Never said that. I thought that I had qualified my statements appropriately, so perhaps you should reread the statements you quote before going e-thug with non sequiturs.

I was running a Cobb tune with full exhaust, which was putting out 340-380 ft-lbs at the wheels by 3000 rpm. I don't have my own dyno, but many exist from quick search:
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=142
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=388
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=421

The stock C63 is hitting just over 300 ft-lbs at 3000 rpm, and just a little more HP than the 335 after 4000 rpm or so (thanks to ktabor's baseline dyno)
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ml#post5800351
2009 C63 - https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ml#post4675482

The reason is that the N54 is using two small turbos that spool quickly and give everything down low. Hence the power dropping off at higher RPM.

And so I took the C63 out to a twisty section of road closer to my house, and it is just fantastic in all respects. No way the BMW dealership would let me take the demo M4 to a similar section of road to test the car, rather sticking to suburb side streets and highways.
Old 03-27-2015, 09:39 AM
  #84  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
JeffDL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by solekeeper
had n54. i wish i would've drove it into a wall sooner.
this is how i felt about my 335 as well. traded it for an e60m5 which was pure bliss until the SMG committed suicide again and again and again....
Old 03-27-2015, 12:38 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
avery.whss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
S550 on order
You guys can't beat a 135 or 335i? Lol Wat????????? How grandma like do you people drive your AMG? Ive walked a Stage 2 active autowerks M3 with ease...my friend has a new 335i and he's trading it in for a Scion FRS because the 335i is such garbage he's had it a month and already has issues

Not sure but if you guys are getting walked by cars with 300-350whp against your tuned C63...I think you should trade that C63 in for a Kia due to your driving style.

Last edited by avery.whss; 03-27-2015 at 12:41 PM.
Old 03-27-2015, 02:50 PM
  #86  
Super Member
 
w204nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 918
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
2017 C63S coupe '09 C63, '15 Durango RT, '14 Jeep SRT8
335i is far from garbage. With very few mods, you can make them pretty fast. Same for the c63 with a tune and headers. You cant compare a 335i to a c63 the same
Way you cant compare a c63 to a f10 m5
Old 03-27-2015, 06:46 PM
  #87  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CarHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 6,358
Received 884 Likes on 619 Posts
E63S | X5
Originally Posted by solekeeper
had n54. i wish i would've drove it into a wall sooner.
You know I kid, so happy you had one.

I had jb4, catless dps, and e85. Yes Avery, that is a recipe to hang with a c63. Big difference between a 135 and 335. Yes, I've had both and the 1 is a blast! Impressive car FOR THE MONEY
Old 04-12-2015, 10:35 AM
  #88  
Member
 
cooperlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Ran against 2 new M3s earlier with downpipes and custom tune. I was slightly pulling away at the end of 4th gear (from 40-150). I have long tube headers, x pipe, catless, no resonator, charcoal intake, and custom tune on a 10' C63
Old 09-01-2015, 10:57 PM
  #89  
Member
 
Ihopaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 C63 Amg
Originally Posted by avery.whss
nope, my C63 is probably one of the most modded here thats without a blower, basically bought everything minus a ice tank and all brand new internals and long-tubes, I've had my c63 for 3 years, blown up a few intakes and many parts, pretty sure i'm not completely brain dead, especially with 2 different dyno's on 2 different days put down around the same #'s ...i think the other dyno i ran like 460-465whp on a hot 30c day

i dont really care if you guys wanna trash talk, go for it, all im relaying is #'s i saw on a computer screen that's it

P.S you just joined in march 2015, talk about someone who doesn't know much.

Sales Team
Yes, Benzworks. We see 35-40wHp on the dyno. Headers and tune make +100-120wHp on the dyno for regular C63.

Right from the horses mouth, 30-40whp w/o a tune.
So you have every mod except for headers and heads/cam, you know all the ones that add serious power. So basically you have a tune, ROW aiboxes, filters, cat/resonator delete and a bunch of ricer boy **** on your car and you think that added 250 rwhp?? WTF are you smoking! Bro you don't even have the most serious power adding mods except for a tune and you are racing a stock M3/M4. Well no **** you won you have 100hp on him. But certainly not 250hp more.
Old 09-01-2015, 10:59 PM
  #90  
Member
 
Ihopaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2013 C63 Amg
Originally Posted by cooperlee
Ran against 2 new M3s earlier with downpipes and custom tune. I was slightly pulling away at the end of 4th gear (from 40-150). I have long tube headers, x pipe, catless, no resonator, charcoal intake, and custom tune on a 10' C63
Thank you! Modded car against another modded car. Other than showing off to your buddies I wouldn't brag about beating a stock with a lot less power and then post about it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Tuned/PP C63 vs. 2015 M3/M4



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13 PM.