C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My timeslips inside - thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 06:07 AM
  #1  
xxaarraa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 882
Likes: 93
Multiple
My timeslips inside - thoughts?

Bone stock 2011 C63 sedan. Conti DWS all seasons.

Pass # 1: "Sport handling mode"



Then it was pointed out to me by my slightly more knowledgeable friends that running 48 PSI in the rear tires wasn't the best idea. I deflated to 28 in rear and did the next run. Been on the list to get it reprogrammed with STAR the ride quality is horrid with 48 psi in the back.



Pass # 2: still in sport mode.



Then I learned about left foot brake, right foot build up revs at staging. I was keeping the revs at 1500 before giving it the beans.

Pass # 3: still in sport mode



Pass # 4: still sport mode.



Pass # 5: Shifted out of sport mode into full traction control mode.



Pass # 6: Transmission in "comfort" mode.



Pass # 7: My best and final pass of the night. Back to sport mode. Revved it up to 2500 with left foot on brake before setting off.



So my question:

I looked up what times a stock C63 is putting down on dragtimes.com and I see a bunch of 12.7s with a lone 12.5. I can't possibly be that close (12.81) to the best times my car is doing by just rolling up and mashing the throttle with winter-biased all season tires? Hell, I even have roof bars on it! I wasn't even trying to be scientific about the launch, I was just mashing it. This means that modern traction control is either that good that a noobie can roll up and go for it, or the times posted on drag times aren't right. Any guesses which it is?





Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 08:42 AM
  #2  
AMGonFire's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 147
2012 c63 AMG, 2011 GLK 350, 2019 GLS 450
Stock times that mags have gotton anywhere from 12.2 to 12.5 most people that post are in that range your 60 foots are high costing you time
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 09:11 AM
  #3  
xxaarraa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 882
Likes: 93
Multiple
Originally Posted by AMGonFire
Stock times that mags have gotton anywhere from 12.2 to 12.5 most people that post are in that range your 60 foots are high costing you time
Gotcha. Do stock C63 owners turn off traction control, leave it in sport mode, or go full traction?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 03:36 PM
  #4  
Gerry_M's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
W204 C63 Bone Stock; E36 M3 Supercharged 400WHP; X5 parts eater
Putting ET aside since that depends on so many things, the trap of 108ish seems low. i was expecting at least 112-114
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 03:54 PM
  #5  
jmueller's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 9
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Jag F-Type V8
108mph and those times are probably all due to the all season tires. With a good sticky summer tire you likely would have seen 12.2s or 12.3s.

When I had my best runs I left the car in sport handling mode and just modulated the throttle to avoid wheel spin.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 06:16 PM
  #6  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
12.8 is a solid run, nice job
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 07:04 PM
  #7  
TTA850's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: NYC
2015 E63S AMG & 2013 GLK350
Conditions matter too, July in New England not the best time to race. My C63 stock went 11.9 at 118 in the fall at Atco but would turn mid 12's during the summer at etown.

My car best runs stock were in S+ and ESP in sport, with drag radials my best runs were using launch control.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 08:36 AM
  #8  
QWKSNKE's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 650
Likes: 20
From: Alabama
09 Carrera S, , 03 F250 CC FX4
My 08 ran similar times a couple of weeks ago. My best was 12.95@ 108 and my worse was 13.1@ 108.

Night time air quality was horrible. Mid 80 temps and around 70% humidity. Hoping for some mid 12's when I go back in the fall
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 06:28 PM
  #9  
layzie12g's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 38
From: Seattle
2008 Mercedes Benz E63
My E with the pano roof and all the mods in my sig went 12.29 at 114 on drag radials, but the track was 115 degrees. 1.9 60 foot. Its strange how it seems some of the 6.2s are making much more power then others. I'm looking at the trap speed more so then anything else.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 08:17 PM
  #10  
BLKROKT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,074
Likes: 2,867
From: Los Angeles
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Agree. The trap speed is way lower than it should be, even considering the heat. I ran 116mph bone stock in summer heat. Does the car have high miles?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 08:49 PM
  #11  
layzie12g's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 38
From: Seattle
2008 Mercedes Benz E63
I'm starting to wonder if failing cam adjusters are the cause of these large power differences with these cars...... I have done the cam timing on a 63 and I understand how they are put together, but I don't understand why some of these cars make power and some do not.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 11:07 PM
  #12  
Gerry_M's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
W204 C63 Bone Stock; E36 M3 Supercharged 400WHP; X5 parts eater
Maybe "HandBuilt" has something to do with it.

or Octane, my car stock is very different going from 91 to 93 to 100... seems to run best at 97.x (mixing)
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2015 | 07:37 AM
  #13  
xxaarraa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 882
Likes: 93
Multiple
Originally Posted by Gerry_M
Putting ET aside since that depends on so many things, the trap of 108ish seems low. i was expecting at least 112-114
Originally Posted by BLKROKT
Agree. The trap speed is way lower than it should be, even considering the heat. I ran 116mph bone stock in summer heat. Does the car have high miles?
You guys are funny. A car that runs 12.81 in 100 degrees has high miles and/or problems?! Wonder how you conclude that from just the trap speed being 4-5 mph lower.

The car has 39k miles.

Originally Posted by jmueller
108mph and those times are probably all due to the all season tires. With a good sticky summer tire you likely would have seen 12.2s or 12.3s.
I can see how DWS/winter-biased tires could be holding me back from doing better. Other than a lack of skill, of course. I plan to work on my launch and 60' times next time I go out to the strip, and my goal for next time is a 12.65.

Last edited by xxaarraa; Aug 2, 2015 at 07:40 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2015 | 11:53 AM
  #14  
BLKROKT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,074
Likes: 2,867
From: Los Angeles
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Listen dude, calm down, don't be so sensitive. Just trying to offer suggestions because your trap is 6-8mph lower than similar cars stock, in similar weather. Don't post up 'Thoughts?" if you don't want to hear any.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2015 | 12:19 PM
  #15  
TTA850's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: NYC
2015 E63S AMG & 2013 GLK350
Originally Posted by BLKROKT
Listen dude, calm down, don't be so sensitive. Just trying to offer suggestions because your trap is 6-8mph lower than similar cars stock, in similar weather. Don't post up 'Thoughts?" if you don't want to hear any.
6-8mph quicker than other stock C63 in similar weather? I'm not so sure about that - best mph I ever saw on my stock 2013 C63 P31 coupe was 118.4 but thats in stellar air at Atco in the fall. In 100* heat and humidity I'd expect to be around what mph he was running.

Same once I did the MBH headers and OE tune, 11.32 at 125.3 was my best but in the heat of the summer 12.0-12.1 at 116-117mph
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2015 | 12:46 PM
  #16  
layzie12g's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 38
From: Seattle
2008 Mercedes Benz E63
12.1 to 11.32 strictly based on temperature? What the hell is wrong with these cars?

That is like when I pulled on a 700 horsepower turbo 997 from 40-130 on a dead even 3 honk race. How does that even happen? Sucks these ecus are so sensitive and feel they need to pull a ton of power.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2015 | 12:58 PM
  #17  
TTA850's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: NYC
2015 E63S AMG & 2013 GLK350
Originally Posted by layzie12g
12.1 to 11.32 strictly based on temperature? What the hell is wrong with these cars?
Nothing wrong with them and they are not overly sensitive - just the nature of air density, oxygen content, and how that effects the air pump under the hood. The math explains it all, go from 100* heat, 80% humidity, 29.60 barometer, and a track with an elevation of 515ft (Island Dragway) to a 40* day, 30% humidity, 30.40 barometer, and a track 33ft (Atco Raceway) above sea level.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE