C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

C63 - " it's not bad on gas it's actually really good"

Old 01-19-2017, 02:27 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
clk63cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Wellington, FL
Posts: 79
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2019 Stage 3 E85 Audi RS3
C63 - " it's not bad on gas it's actually really good"

LOL....

http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/5945830796.html
Old 01-19-2017, 02:31 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Adi-Benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 4,672
Received 540 Likes on 477 Posts
2010 C300 4MATIC........ 2011 C63 AMG.............. 2015 CLS400 4MATIC.....
seems like a drug dealer owned it and thats why its salvage too

lmaoooo
Old 01-19-2017, 02:32 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,044
Received 2,810 Likes on 1,664 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Are 2010's really going for under $20k now?

Ah, I see the salvage title now.
Old 01-19-2017, 03:36 PM
  #4  
DP8
Junior Member
 
DP8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 29
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
E90 M3, '13 C63 Sedan
On a related note, I have been a surprised with "relatively" good gas mileage when mostly on highway driving. I've been driving 40 miles each way to work mostly on the highway and the computer says average gas mileage between 18 - 19 mpg and that's going most 70+ on the highway. I don't think it's possible to crack 20 mpg. I think most modern cars/SUVs are rated high 20's low 30's on the highway so it's not that much worse haha. Perfect everyday driver in my opinion. Makes the drive seem to go by faster.

I wish the gas tank was a little larger though so the total range was higher.
The following users liked this post:
kickinrocks (01-19-2017)
Old 01-19-2017, 03:51 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
INS1GNIA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 2,532
Received 396 Likes on 275 Posts
'13 C63 AMG P31
Originally Posted by DP8
On a related note, I have been a surprised with "relatively" good gas mileage when mostly on highway driving. I've been driving 40 miles each way to work mostly on the highway and the computer says average gas mileage between 18 - 19 mpg and that's going most 70+ on the highway. I don't think it's possible to crack 20 mpg. I think most modern cars/SUVs are rated high 20's low 30's on the highway so it's not that much worse haha. Perfect everyday driver in my opinion. Makes the drive seem to go by faster.

I wish the gas tank was a little larger though so the total range was higher.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-best-mpg.html

I agree, a bigger tank would be great.
Old 01-19-2017, 03:54 PM
  #6  
DP8
Junior Member
 
DP8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 29
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
E90 M3, '13 C63 Sedan
Wow 25.2! I need to work on that.
The following users liked this post:
kickinrocks (01-19-2017)
Old 01-19-2017, 04:05 PM
  #7  
Member
 
BITRBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Miami
Posts: 163
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
2001 Audi S4 Sedan (RIP) 2013 P31 W204 C63 (RIP)
OP, I see you're from FL... Out of curiosity, what do you use to search CraigsList nationally? Just one of those random engines from a Google search?
Old 01-19-2017, 04:13 PM
  #8  
Member
 
BITRBO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Miami
Posts: 163
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
2001 Audi S4 Sedan (RIP) 2013 P31 W204 C63 (RIP)
Originally Posted by INS1GNIA
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-best-mpg.html

I agree, a bigger tank would be great.
Sorry, but ECU generated averages are b.s. and notorious for being optimistic. I've tracked every tank / fill-up on my last 4 cars using GasTracker+ and the computer was always at least 2-4mpg 'nicer' than reality...

Not that it should really matter in THESE particular cars, but the only way to get an accurate figure is by simple math: miles-driven ÷ gallons-pumped
Old 01-19-2017, 04:35 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
SuperFastYo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 723
Received 99 Likes on 72 Posts
C63 AMG - LSD
Originally Posted by BITRBO
Sorry, but ECU generated averages are b.s. and notorious for being optimistic. I've tracked every tank / fill-up on my last 4 cars using GasTracker+ and the computer was always at least 2-4mpg 'nicer' than reality...

Not that it should really matter in THESE particular cars, but the only way to get an accurate figure is by simple math: miles-driven ÷ gallons-pumped
Optimistic?! I hope not, mine shows like 8mpg right now. If that's optimistic Im f*cked
Old 01-19-2017, 05:21 PM
  #10  
Member
 
kickinrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 150
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
2013 C63 P31, V5 tune
Originally Posted by SuperFastYo
Optimistic?! I hope not, mine shows like 8mpg right now. If that's optimistic Im f*cked
Jesus, 8mpg . May I suggest getting some Exxon stock to get some ROI?
Old 01-19-2017, 05:30 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
nobbyv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: The NH
Posts: 497
Received 55 Likes on 43 Posts
2016 Cardinal Red AMG C63 S
Originally Posted by INS1GNIA
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-best-mpg.html

I agree, a bigger tank would be great.
I've seen 24+ MPG as well on longer highway runs. I also REALLY wish the car had a larger tank. My wife can go 450+ in her Audi Q5. I am jelly.
Old 01-19-2017, 06:26 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
clk63cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Wellington, FL
Posts: 79
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2019 Stage 3 E85 Audi RS3
Originally Posted by BITRBO
OP, I see you're from FL... Out of curiosity, what do you use to search CraigsList nationally? Just one of those random engines from a Google search?
Actually randomly look at some of the larger us cities. I think that it may be one of the last ways outside of a random eBay auction to buy one very underpriced sometimes, but at same point comes with more risk. But with car fax, vmi, and a ppi it's a fairly safe bet usually.
Old 01-19-2017, 06:53 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadkillrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,354
Received 679 Likes on 464 Posts
12 C63BS Magno Alanite Grey, 22 X3M Brooklyn Grey, 08 BMW E93, 22 Ducati Desert Sled, John Deere 3R
Originally Posted by DP8
Wow 25.2! I need to work on that.
Well someone isn't having any fun, I have never seen more than 19 even on the highway!
Old 01-20-2017, 07:22 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Vladds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 1,168
Received 126 Likes on 96 Posts
2010 C63 2019 GLA45
My displayed average MPG was also optimistic by 2 MPG. Then is did a reset of the ECU adaptations with the STAR and it settled at .5 MPG optimistic.


I saw 20.5 MPG doing around 70 constant on the parkway for an hour, looked like it might have climbed a bit more if I was to have driven like this longer.
At this point I replaced the rear oxygen sensors, they may be related to the trims and they seem like they may be worth in my car .5 MPG. These are not expensive, got the pair for less than $100, OEM boxed.


I'm still getting just below 13 MPG in commute, but I saw the news with OPEC, the fuel price may be going up.
If it goes back into the $4's, it's worth having the car fuel system work 100% as designed. I will do the front sensors next.
Old 01-20-2017, 11:07 AM
  #15  
Super Member
 
ENV²'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NY
Posts: 793
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
2001 Porsche 911 Turbo (heavily modified)
C63 gets decent gas mileage for such a large engine. My CTS-V Wagon averages 12-14mpg and on weekends it averages 8-10mpg. Whereas my C63 averaged 16-19mpg and on weekends would get 11-13mpg...


But... the wagon weighs 600 lbs more and has one less gear.
Old 01-20-2017, 11:26 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MTV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,060
Received 94 Likes on 73 Posts
E55 AMG & C63 AMG
C63 is definitely not good on gas. It is better than my old E60 M5 though... that thing was just brutal.
Old 01-20-2017, 11:28 AM
  #17  
Super Member
 
ENV²'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NY
Posts: 793
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
2001 Porsche 911 Turbo (heavily modified)
Originally Posted by MTV10
C63 is definitely not good on gas. It is better than my old E60 M5 though... that thing was just brutal.


So much truth to this. I had a friend of mine's e60 M5 SMG and that thing always showed avg mpg 7-8mpg. ALWAYS.
Old 01-21-2017, 01:16 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
simandang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 409
Received 87 Likes on 58 Posts
G63/RR LWB/W222 S550
I got around 21 the other day on a trip from eatern li to upstate Not bad at all.
Old 01-22-2017, 12:31 AM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
zcct04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston - Clear Lake
Posts: 1,307
Received 80 Likes on 66 Posts
C63 coupe, Z3M Roadster garage queen
Originally Posted by simandang
I got around 21 the other day on a trip from eatern li to upstate Not bad at all.
in your 335i?
The following users liked this post:
SuperFastYo (01-22-2017)
Old 01-22-2017, 03:20 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadkillrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,354
Received 679 Likes on 464 Posts
12 C63BS Magno Alanite Grey, 22 X3M Brooklyn Grey, 08 BMW E93, 22 Ducati Desert Sled, John Deere 3R
Personal best today 6am empty highway, cruise control @75mpg and got 21mpg for 20 minutes of uninterrupted cruise control, just don't see 25 in my future ever!
Old 01-23-2017, 11:42 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by DP8
On a related note, I have been a surprised with "relatively" good gas mileage when mostly on highway driving. I've been driving 40 miles each way to work mostly on the highway and the computer says average gas mileage between 18 - 19 mpg and that's going most 70+ on the highway. I don't think it's possible to crack 20 mpg. I think most modern cars/SUVs are rated high 20's low 30's on the highway so it's not that much worse haha. Perfect everyday driver in my opinion. Makes the drive seem to go by faster.

I wish the gas tank was a little larger though so the total range was higher.
Doing a bit of math on 11.2 L/kph comes in at 21.1 mpg US gal.
Got that just after I got the car in September after a reset once I was on the highway for a 2.5 hr run. Never had the opportunity to see it again. I averaged 18.4 mpg and about 35.6 mph on mixed driving over the long haul of time. Doesn't change much. It is worse than my 2011 E350 wagon that averaged 22 mpg and the CLA45 AMG at 24.6 mpg but the fun quotient is well worth it.
Old 01-25-2017, 01:18 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
zcct04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston - Clear Lake
Posts: 1,307
Received 80 Likes on 66 Posts
C63 coupe, Z3M Roadster garage queen
Originally Posted by BITRBO
OP, I see you're from FL... Out of curiosity, what do you use to search CraigsList nationally? Just one of those random engines from a Google search?
try using an aggregator like searchtempest.com
Old 01-25-2017, 05:13 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Celicasaur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,752
Received 169 Likes on 120 Posts
W212 - E63 AMG
Originally Posted by BITRBO
Sorry, but ECU generated averages are b.s. and notorious for being optimistic. I've tracked every tank / fill-up on my last 4 cars using GasTracker+ and the computer was always at least 2-4mpg 'nicer' than reality...

Not that it should really matter in THESE particular cars, but the only way to get an accurate figure is by simple math: miles-driven ÷ gallons-pumped
Interesting. I occasionally verify mine manually with a calculator vs fill up quantity and looking at the miles since i last reset the thingy and it's more or less the same

But going to the point of the guy with the advert...I actually do think these motors aren't as bad as the 6.2l size would have you believe. I mean...it's a damnsight better than my E39 M5 on fuel, that is for sure. I never moan about how quickly the fuel goes down on my E63....but for some reason, I always do in the M5. That's a lot closer to 11-12 around down while the E is 15-16...only 4mpg, but another way to look at it is it's around 30% better.

On another note though, the possibility of me having clogged up cats and having the fuel leaned out accordingly is probably a factor also.
Old 01-25-2017, 07:08 AM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,044
Received 2,810 Likes on 1,664 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
You know, not to hijack the OPs thread here, but I bet you could take a cat off in under 20min if you really wanted to check if they were clogged or not. I'm starting to think you may just like talking about your broken car.
Old 01-25-2017, 09:25 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Celicasaur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,752
Received 169 Likes on 120 Posts
W212 - E63 AMG
^^^ Yeah that's probably true, but seeing as I'll have my headers fitted within the next month probably, I'll just wait and keep my fingers crossed. It's too cold to do a task like this and get under the car man.

But for the sake of this thread, I included my possible cat issue because the car seems to be a little bit better on fuel than the others etc, so i thought it was a relevant point to make (esp as the AFR's are nice and lean via Jerry's tune)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63 - " it's not bad on gas it's actually really good"



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.