C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MPG better than expected

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-21-2017, 06:28 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluefootedbooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Socal
Posts: 61
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
'13 C63 Sedan w/ P31 & 471 ^_^
MPG better than expected

I thought these cars were supposed to have terrible gas mileage? :-)



Drove leisurely for this but still, pleasantly surprised!
Old 07-21-2017, 07:28 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
iownedu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
2014 Mercedes E63S AMG
Originally Posted by bluefootedbooby
I thought these cars were supposed to have terrible gas mileage? :-)



Drove leisurely for this but still, pleasantly surprised!
Yeah mine says about 23 on the hwy which is great in my opinion. But I buy cars for smiles per gallon.
The following 2 users liked this post by iownedu:
bluefootedbooby (07-28-2017), ChatWithaNinja (07-23-2017)
Old 07-21-2017, 07:45 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluefootedbooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Socal
Posts: 61
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
'13 C63 Sedan w/ P31 & 471 ^_^
I was expecting much worse than my former M3 with the 4.0.
This actually seems very reasonable for a 6.2.

Smiles per gallon gauge is pegged
Old 07-22-2017, 12:46 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
I don't see this as anything special if you are cruising at more or less constant speeds on the highway. It is urban driving that suck the tank dry.
I like to watch the mised driving numbers.
My E350 4 matic 2011 wagon would give me 8.8-9.0 L/100km on the highway but mixed was 10.6L/100km.
My CLA45 AMG would get down in the 7.8-8.0 L/100 km but the mixed was around 9.4-9.6L/100 km.
This beast with the performance package will give me 10.5-10.8 on the highway but the mixed is in the 12.5-12.8 range. Curiously all these cars show a mix average speed as a daily driver of arond 56-60 kph.
I always think of gas as the cheapest thing I put out on cars. I like the notion of smiles per mile too.
Old 07-22-2017, 01:47 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
NotABaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 900
Received 113 Likes on 87 Posts
2012 C63, 2014 E550
You guys are all insane. Im over 20L/100km with mostly city driving. Average speed is probably 15-20kmh which really hurts.

And absolutely agree with the smiles per kilometer metric. Smile width = 1/fuel efficiency.
Old 07-22-2017, 08:39 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by NotABaller
You guys are all insane. Im over 20L/100km with mostly city driving. Average speed is probably 15-20kmh which really hurts.

And absolutely agree with the smiles per kilometer metric. Smile width = 1/fuel efficiency.
Get your system checked mate. Were you the guy asking about cleaning sooty tail pipes that were coked right up? Could be. clue you are running rich as hell.
At worst under those conditions I never see over 16.
Old 07-22-2017, 09:13 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
KrisKeeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 266
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
2016 E63S W212 Matte Gray
I cannot comment upon the canadian measurements; all the Litters and Kilo presentations have my math brain sputtering. I can say, however, that I too have been pleasantly surprised by the highway mileage (I've had my '13 C63 about 3 weeks). About 22mpg average highway mileage, at 75 mph average, including over mountain range (Blue Ridge, Charlottesville, VA). This equals or exceeds my former W211 E55 supercharged. Not bad for such a large motor. Very pleased. City stop and go is brutal, but the cruising mileage is solid.

Trending Topics

Old 07-22-2017, 09:40 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
It is simple 10L/100 km = 23.8 mpg US or in your case 22 mpg is about 10.9L/100 km which is about what I see on a straight highway run. Best ever in the 10 months I have had this car was 10.6 at about 60 mph.

Last edited by Alex.currie44; 07-22-2017 at 09:44 AM.
Old 07-22-2017, 12:13 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
604 C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,818
Received 393 Likes on 272 Posts
2012 E550 Cabrio
Originally Posted by NotABaller
You guys are all insane. Im over 20L/100km with mostly city driving. Average speed is probably 15-20kmh which really hurts.

And absolutely agree with the smiles per kilometer metric. Smile width = 1/fuel efficiency.
Originally Posted by Alex.currie44
Get your system checked mate. Were you the guy asking about cleaning sooty tail pipes that were coked right up? Could be. clue you are running rich as hell.
At worst under those conditions I never see over 16.
Im the same here Alex, minus the super sooty pipes. I'm right in town so its all stop light to stop light, and that tends to be how I drive it.
I have unlocked my inner 16 year old lol.

Every time I get a chance to drive on the highway I am VERY pleased by the mileage, so even some sort of mix would go a long ways.
I hate those damn idle shutoff things in the new cars, but cant help but wonder how much gas/time I waste at stop lights. The time factor is certainly high.
Old 07-22-2017, 12:45 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by 604 C63
Im the same here Alex, minus the super sooty pipes. I'm right in town so its all stop light to stop light, and that tends to be how I drive it.
I have unlocked my inner 16 year old lol.

Every time I get a chance to drive on the highway I am VERY pleased by the mileage, so even some sort of mix would go a long ways.
I hate those damn idle shutoff things in the new cars, but cant help but wonder how much gas/time I waste at stop lights. The time factor is certainly high.
Two cars - SLK350 and ClA45 AMG - had the eco feature of engine shut off.
I worried about the starter but after taling with my guys I relaxed.
In the SLK V6 the starter motor came on. occasionally. I am told in the V8s it is rare that it restarts the engine.
This is because the system knows the optimum cylinder in terms of piston position to kick the engine to start it. All it does is deliver spark and fuel and the movement of that cylinder rolls the motor and away you go.
The 4 of the CLA45 used the starter what seemed to be 25-30% of the time.
I cannot recall the specific data but I did test both cars over a period of a few weeks were I shut off the ECO start and I did notice fuel economy was not as good without it in my mixed driving when compared to what it was when it was on.
Old 07-22-2017, 01:50 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
iownedu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
2014 Mercedes E63S AMG
Originally Posted by Alex.currie44
Two cars - SLK350 and ClA45 AMG - had the eco feature of engine shut off.
I worried about the starter but after taling with my guys I relaxed.
In the SLK V6 the starter motor came on. occasionally. I am told in the V8s it is rare that it restarts the engine.
This is because the system knows the optimum cylinder in terms of piston position to kick the engine to start it. All it does is deliver spark and fuel and the movement of that cylinder rolls the motor and away you go.
The 4 of the CLA45 used the starter what seemed to be 25-30% of the time.
I cannot recall the specific data but I did test both cars over a period of a few weeks were I shut off the ECO start and I did notice fuel economy was not as good without it in my mixed driving when compared to what it was when it was on.
That is correct, AMG's don't use the starter with eco mode. My e63s had the feature.
Old 07-23-2017, 12:02 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
zcct04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston - Clear Lake
Posts: 1,307
Received 80 Likes on 66 Posts
C63 coupe, Z3M Roadster garage queen
You may want to track actual fuel usage and distances between fillups before celebrating TOO much. Most users have reported that the car's mpg calculator is optimistic, typically by about 10%.

My car has proven capable of some surprisingly good mpg numbers when driven very carefully. However, that isn't much fun. I've noted an inverse relationship between the level of grins and giggles while driving vs the level of groaning at the next fillup. I like the smiles per gallon concept a lot!
Old 07-23-2017, 02:42 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
AhhMyyGawd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 291
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
2015 C63 AMG Coupe
I have yet to see anything close to that number haha. Never taken the car for a long trip, mostly city driving. 10-12mpg at best with very tame driving.
Old 07-23-2017, 09:58 AM
  #14  
Member
 
ChatWithaNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: ATL
Posts: 147
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2010 R350, 2012 CLS63 P30 (sold), 2009 C63 (totaled), 2002 ML320 (Sold)
Originally Posted by iownedu
Yeah mine says about 23 on the hwy which is great in my opinion. But I buy cars for smiles per gallon.
This is the best thing I've heard this week. I'll be saying this from now on when the haters say "yeah, but how about your mileage?"

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: MPG better than expected



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 AM.