Any one here test drive or own the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio?




Let me know your thoughts on your test drives or even ownership or even just thoughts
Let me know your thoughts on your test drives or even ownership or even just thoughts

I have not been able to test drive one yet but I do have a thought on all the test results I have seen.
They are of course tested against the C63/M3/ATS-V etc. and all of them have Mich. PSS tires except the Alfa which has a race tire equivalent to the Mich Cup 2 tire. that makes a big difference in performance measurements as you know, so I would like to see a apples to apples test with the same tires.
Also I think most of the tests had the Alfa breaking down in some manner.
Let me know your thoughts on your test drives or even ownership or even just thoughts

I do not think I would ever consider something so rare/unpopular because to me, that also means:
- Less dealerships to repair
- Less spare sparts in stock
- Super expensive and long repair times
- Lower resale value
- Its Italian (no ownership experience, but I do not believe I have ever heard anybody put Italian and reliable in the same sentence in a positive context)
It doesnt affect any of you, but I am also in Taiwan. South Taiwan has 1 Maserati dealership. I heard that the average repair time for the Ghibli (not that I would get 1) is 1 month here.
Can you imagine that? Waiting 1 month for the dealership to fix your car. No thanks
Last edited by waisoserious; Sep 30, 2017 at 05:14 AM.
Let me know your thoughts on your test drives or even ownership or even just thoughts

Nice tight car, smaller and more nimble than C63, BUT while the test results are very comparable, the C63 feels and sounds much stronger at low to mid range. If you have room to open it up, Alfa feels comparable above 5000 rpm.
For driving around town, the C is way more rewarding. A country drive in curvy roads would probably favor the Alfa.
For me it was a no brainer - keep the C63S.
Last edited by DragonRR; Oct 2, 2017 at 03:35 AM.




Nice tight car, smaller and more nimble than C63, BUT while the test results are very comparable, the C63 feels and sounds much stronger at low to mid range. If you have room to open it up, Alfa feels comparable above 5000 rpm.
For driving around town, the C is way more rewarding. A country drive in curvy roads would probably favor the Alfa.
For me it was a no brainer - keep the C63S.
Thanks to all and thanks to the above users who drove it.
Thunder I can see what you are talking about in regards to usability on the street as the tq curves are different between our AMG's and the QV.
Thanks Dragon... I guess I need to get behind the wheel of one.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I have not been able to test drive one yet but I do have a thought on all the test results I have seen.
They are of course tested against the C63/M3/ATS-V etc. and all of them have Mich. PSS tires except the Alfa which has a race tire equivalent to the Mich Cup 2 tire. that makes a big difference in performance measurements as you know, so I would like to see a apples to apples test with the same tires.
Also I think most of the tests had the Alfa breaking down in some manner.
I absolutely love the car, but would have a hard time buying one with the dealer networks being weak and the electrical problems I have read and seen in reviews.
The C63S is the perfect mix of everything, not as fast as the M3 on the track and I think the M3 looks a bit "sportier". But the interior of the C63S blows the M3/M4 out of the water, the exhaust and engine sound WAY better (an no need for fake engine sounds from the speakers) and the power is much greater. Plus, M3/M4's are a dime a dozen where I live, but I rarely see any C63's (especially the "S")
The car isn't going to be on the track more than once or twice a year and even when it is, it's not on there to set lap records, it's on there for me to enjoy the car and have some fun with it. I came from 2 M3's and Porsche 911 Turbo and for me, this is a really great car!!!
Let me know your thoughts on your test drives or even ownership or even just thoughts

Huh, it’s so weird to see such a disparity between dealers inventory statuses. When I was shopping just recently, I contacted someone who locates and buys cars for people. I said I felt like since it’s an FCA product I should be able to walk in and get 10% off without blinking. He said normally, yes, but the Quad is the only model selling. My experience with the 2 dealerships within 300 miles of me was similar - great offers on the lower trim models but wouldn’t budge $20 on the Quads.
On a separate note, the Stelvio even in the 4 cyl guise, drives THAT much better than the Macan variants (S, GTS, Turbo), Q5/SQ5, F pace. I haven't driven the GLC43 AMG yet. But the AMG will be too pricey. The Stelvio fully loaded can be had for high 40's after incentives. But again, what hurts it is not enough gadgets and less room. But for high 40's? I think it's very well worth it.
Thanks for all the help guys!
Quick update:
C43: still trying to find allocations down here in FL. Reaching out to other dealers to check pricing for pre-orders. Dealers are really not paying attention because of 2018models that they are trying to get rid off...
Quadrifoglio: down to a price very comparable to a new C43 2019 heavily loaded.
Maserati: interesting enough this is the cheapest option out the 3 models... going to test drive to check build quality and reliability as you guys suggested.





