Rinky-dink Rear Brake Calipers
I can tell you what I think after owning 4 Benz vehicles. They are cheaping out and their build quality/designs/methods, becoming increasingly Japanese. Uncharacteristic of the German car feel that most purists, like myself, enjoy.
I also think it's a cop out to say esthetics don't matter on an AMG car. Even if the function over form statement is true, I still need to see a proper brake caliper on the back of my AMG vehicle.
Unrelated thought but they're also cheapening the AMG brand by offering new entry level models.
Following suit with the worst offender BMW, who slaps ten thousand M badges all over non-M vehicles when you order the right package. Makes it rubbish for the real M owners. I see Benz clearly going down that road. Concerns me.
Last edited by M66M; Oct 7, 2017 at 01:29 PM.
That's why I liked AMG, but I do see them following the same trend now.
Trending Topics

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...pe-test-review
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
If they stick a big 4-piston caliper back there, you will feel better, but you will get no difference in actual function, but it will be heavier and add unnecessary cost and complexity for no positive effects.
I personally don't have any problem from a performance or aesthetic viewpoint. I recognize that the rear brakes do a significantly less percentage of overall system braking, so it makes sense to me when the rotors, calipers, and such are lower-spec than the front. I was a little surprised when I noticed that the C63 had a single-piston rear caliper, but then again, I don't actually know how that affects performance versus, say, a 4-piston setup. I also noticed that even the AMG GT-R has a similar setup and that car doesn't really lack for performance in any way.
I personally don't have any problem from a performance or aesthetic viewpoint. I recognize that the rear brakes do a significantly less percentage of overall system braking, so it makes sense to me when the rotors, calipers, and such are lower-spec than the front. I was a little surprised when I noticed that the C63 had a single-piston rear caliper, but then again, I don't actually know how that affects performance versus, say, a 4-piston setup. I also noticed that even the AMG GT-R has a similar setup and that car doesn't really lack for performance in any way.
The theory behind the performance difference between fixed and floating calipers is a bit more complex.
In a fixed caliper design, you have piston(s) on each side of the caliper (both on the inside and on the outside of the rotor). Each set of pistons squeeze again a pad on that corresponding side of the rotor and (theoretically) evenly apply pressure to each pad. Only the pistons and pads move; the rest of the caliper stays fixed (hence the "fixed" name)
With a floating caliper design, you only have pistons on one side of the caliper. When it applies force to the brake pad on the piston side, that portion of the caliper with the pistons "floats" and causes the pad on the other side of the caliper to move along with it.
It's hard to explain without seeing, so look at this YouTube video for a good visualization.
Notice how both pads don't apply even pressure at the same time? This is the performance advantage a fixed piston setup has since it (theoretically) applies both pads evenly at the same time.
And when I say performance, I don't just mean stopping distance. This applies to initial bite, how linear (or non-linear) the brakes function, how the pedal ultimately feels, and so forth.
Last edited by msd3075; Oct 10, 2017 at 12:15 PM.
And let me tell you the build quality is light years better on the 2017 than the 2005. The Chrysler years were ugly.








