C63/C63S AMG
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New C63s Owner To Be - I Have A Few Questions

Old Jun 16, 2021 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
RavenM6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 528
Likes: 135
From: Houston, TX
2010 BMW E63 M6 Coupe 2023 AMG C63s Coupe 2005 YZF-R1
New C63s Owner To Be - I Have A Few Questions

Hey everyone! So I was in the market for a daily driver and had my eyes firmly set on an Infiniti Q60 Red Sport. I test drove a 2019 for a day, and just could not justify dropping nearly $45k into a car that felt and looked so cheaply made. I figured I could buy a C43 AMG for almost the same price. While I’d be sacrificing about 40hp compared to the Infiniti, I’d be getting a ton more car. After searching for the perfect C43 for over a month, I decided if I was gonna drop almost $50k into a used C43 why not just go big or go home with the C63 for a few grand more. By few, I mean $15-20k but to me it would be money well spent. My weekend car is a 2010 E63 M6, for those who might not know, it’s BMW’s one and final N/A V10 with the S85 5.0L motor that puts out 500hp stock. It’s a blast to drive and I plan to keep it forever so I wanted a d/d that wouldn’t be such a huge downgrade in power. The Infiniti Q60 and C43 AMG met those criteria, as does the C63S with flying colors. Which is where I’m at today.

I’m looking at 2018-2019’s as those years would best fit my price budget. I generally do not like buying first year models, so I’m not considering any 2017’s. I realize the 2019 had the front grill facelift, which I plan on doing should I get a 2018. Apart from the front grill, are there any other major changes in the 2019 from 2018? Was the 64 color ambient light available in the 2018? I looked at an ‘18 online that has the Advance Lighting Package (option 319). The package lists 877 ambient lighting but not 64 color. Can someone shed some light on this (no pun intended!)?

The other must have options for me are HUD and performance exhaust. I’d love to hear which options you C63 folks feel are must-have options!
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 09:18 AM
  #2  
dctwc63s's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 340
Likes: 82
2019 C63S Sedan
there are heaps of threads on this....do a Google search ”facelift c63s differences mbworld” its way easier than the forum search function.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 09:51 AM
  #3  
skratch77's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 381
2005 E55
2017s sound the best! And 2015 was first year model!
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 11:03 AM
  #4  
smbsocal's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 16
From: Charlotte, NC
'21 C63S Cabrio, '21 Corvette C8, '18 BMW X5
Originally Posted by RavenM6
Hey everyone! So I was in the market for a daily driver and had my eyes firmly set on an Infiniti Q60 Red Sport. I test drove a 2019 for a day, and just could not justify dropping nearly $45k into a car that felt and looked so cheaply made. I figured I could buy a C43 AMG for almost the same price. While I’d be sacrificing about 40hp compared to the Infiniti, I’d be getting a ton more car. After searching for the perfect C43 for over a month, I decided if I was gonna drop almost $50k into a used C43 why not just go big or go home with the C63 for a few grand more. By few, I mean $15-20k but to me it would be money well spent. My weekend car is a 2010 E63 M6, for those who might not know, it’s BMW’s one and final N/A V10 with the S85 5.0L motor that puts out 500hp stock. It’s a blast to drive and I plan to keep it forever so I wanted a d/d that wouldn’t be such a huge downgrade in power. The Infiniti Q60 and C43 AMG met those criteria, as does the C63S with flying colors. Which is where I’m at today.

I’m looking at 2018-2019’s as those years would best fit my price budget. I generally do not like buying first year models, so I’m not considering any 2017’s. I realize the 2019 had the front grill facelift, which I plan on doing should I get a 2018. Apart from the front grill, are there any other major changes in the 2019 from 2018? Was the 64 color ambient light available in the 2018? I looked at an ‘18 online that has the Advance Lighting Package (option 319). The package lists 877 ambient lighting but not 64 color. Can someone shed some light on this (no pun intended!)?

The other must have options for me are HUD and performance exhaust. I’d love to hear which options you C63 folks feel are must-have options!
Since it is a daily driver something to consider is that the 2019 would have a more comfortable suspension in comfort mode and 9 speed transmission (instead of 7).
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 11:24 AM
  #5  
tobeit's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 424
From: Florida
AMG C63s
Originally Posted by smbsocal
Since it is a daily driver something to consider is that the 2019 would have a more comfortable suspension in comfort mode and 9 speed transmission (instead of 7).
I drove both and I hear the constant rave about the 9 speed...while it surely is the superior box for certain applications I did not like it for my daily use. For me, it felt the car is constantly hunting to shift. The car has plenty of torque to not need to shift that often. In auto shift mode (the mode I use most often for daily driving) I was like in 9th gear at 50mph or so...that annoyed me. I also felt that not only due to the exhaust system changes but also that those extra 2 gears and earlier shifting contribute for the FL to have less of the pops and bangs when it does shift. Cant comment to much on the comfortable suspension argument. My PFL is lowered to the max w/o rubbing and that adds its own harshness and I can't compare to a none lowered FL...but I did not buy and modify that car to ride like a S-class. But it sure is more than comfy enough for me to use it for 6h trips w/o any issues...aka PFL in comfort mode and even lowered is still a very practical ride for long trips and I have no complains.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 11:47 AM
  #6  
ParadigmDawg's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 881
Likes: 300
AMG GLC 63s Coupe
Why stop at a 63 when you can get a 63s?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 12:02 PM
  #7  
smbsocal's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 16
From: Charlotte, NC
'21 C63S Cabrio, '21 Corvette C8, '18 BMW X5
Originally Posted by tobeit
I drove both and I hear the constant rave about the 9 speed...while it surely is the superior box for certain applications I did not like it for my daily use. For me, it felt the car is constantly hunting to shift. The car has plenty of torque to not need to shift that often. In auto shift mode (the mode I use most often for daily driving) I was like in 9th gear at 50mph or so...that annoyed me. I also felt that not only due to the exhaust system changes but also that those extra 2 gears and earlier shifting contribute for the FL to have less of the pops and bangs when it does shift. Cant comment to much on the comfortable suspension argument. My PFL is lowered to the max w/o rubbing and that adds its own harshness and I can't compare to a none lowered FL...but I did not buy and modify that car to ride like a S-class. But it sure is more than comfy enough for me to use it for 6h trips w/o any issues...aka PFL in comfort mode and even lowered is still a very practical ride for long trips and I have no complains.
The FL exhaust sound is definitely neutered compared to PFL, even with the Renntech EVM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 12:44 PM
  #8  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,432
Likes: 5,342
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
OP, there are indeed several threads around here discussing the differences and plenty of reviews and videos on the web, but I suppose it can be a bit daunting to weed through all the bias in these threads. So, let me try to summarize the differences at bit. The 2019 is more than a cosmetic grill. It's an updated model.
  • As mentioned above already, the 2019 has a new 9-speed MCT transmission vs the 7-speed MCT transmission in the 2018. I agree with the frequent shifting comment above. That's the nature of a transmission with so many gears as it can keep the engine closer to the optimal rpm as an approximation of a CVT which has infinite gear ratios to keep the engine in the sweet spot at all times. I don't mind the frequent shifting really as I mainly view the automatic modes as convenience for lazy driving and I only use the automatic shifting in Comfort mode. Otherwise, I use manual mode 90+% of the time and the most important improvement for me is the much better and much more responsive manual mode of the 9-speed. If you mainly drive in automatic mode, then the 7-speed will shift less, but I hated the 2nd gear start it does in Comfort mode. Because it has a clutch instead of a torque converter it just ends up slipping the clutch like crazy and it feels odd and laggy. The 9-speed always starts in 1st gear for a much better off the line response in every mode.
  • The second improvement is the revised suspension. Not only does it ride better and is more compliant overall, it's also more dynamic in S+. Partly thanks to the new for the 2019 AMG DYNAMICS system, which is an active driving dynamics control system that expands ESP and improves the handling of the car. Here's more info in the context of the GT, but it's the same system. It was introduced with the GT R Pro and the C63 was the first other model that got it after the Pro: https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaS...l?oid=42956027. This obviously is more of a benefit when you start throwing the car around corners.
  • The third improvement of the S model only is the all-new 9-stage traction control system straight from the GT R. It's rooted in GT racing and came from the AMG GT3. Traction is the biggest Achilles heel of the C63 and the new traction control system does a much better job managing it and working with the driver instead of against them. It's the first traction control system that doesn't annoy me. You don't even have to manually adjust the levels, which is only possible if ESP is off completely anyway, but it just manages the torque so much better to make the most use of the available traction. IMO, it makes the car more enjoyable and useable w/o constantly fighting traction control.
  • Lastly there are a bunch of upgrades to the interior. The 2019 has a newer Infotainment system, with a new UI, widescreen and standard Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The online system also is much better with OTA updates and regular map updates for the navigation system. First 3 years are complimentary. It also has an optional digital instrument cluster which is amazing, IMO and the best part is the new steering wheel with the drive mode selectors that allow you to pretty much adjust anything directly from the steering wheel and not having to take your hands off it. I particularly like that I can just press the drive mode selector knob to instantly activate the Individual mode. All the tech is essentially upgraded. If you get one with the driving assistance features, they are also noticeably improved over the 2018. The 2019 also has new headlight technology if you get one with the upgraded lighting package. They are now an 80 LED matrix that in most markets can darken the areas of oncoming traffic, but unfortunately due to regulations here in the USA we don't' get that functionality. Instead it simulates more traditional adaptive high beams that can turn on/off in segments to not blind oncoming traffic.
  • There are other improvements throughout the car, for example the electronic locking differential is faster acting now and they revised the dynamic engine mounts in the S model, which is partly responsible for the additional comfort in Comfort mode while tightening the drivetrain only when you actually start driving faster and more dynamically.
The main thing the 2019+ gets chewed out for is the slightly tamed exhaust note. It doesn't pop&bang for most of normal driving. You have to drive it aggressively at high rpms to get the theatrics, but this doesn't bother me at all. I prefer the sound of the 2019 overall. To me it's a GT, and if I drive it casually I don't want the theatrics. The US spec models also don't have the particulate filter, which makes the EU models even quieter.

Last edited by superswiss; Jun 17, 2021 at 12:48 PM.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 01:16 PM
  #9  
tobeit's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 424
From: Florida
AMG C63s
Originally Posted by superswiss
OP, there are indeed several threads around here discussing the differences and plenty of reviews and videos on the web, but I suppose it can be a bit daunting to weed through all the bias in these threads. So, let me try to summarize the differences at bit. The 2019 is more than a cosmetic grill. It's an updated model.
  • As mentioned above already, the 2019 has a new 9-speed MCT transmission vs the 7-speed MCT transmission in the 2018. I agree with the frequent shifting comment above. That's the nature of a transmission with so many gears as it can keep the engine closer to the optimal rpm as an approximation of a CVT which has infinite gear ratios to keep the engine in the sweet spot at all times. I don't mind the frequent shifting really as I mainly view the automatic modes as convenience for lazy driving and I only use the automatic shifting in Comfort mode. Otherwise, I use manual mode 90+% of the time and the most important improvement for me is the much better and much more responsive manual mode of the 9-speed. If you mainly drive in automatic mode, then the 7-speed will shift less, but I hated the 2nd gear start it does in Comfort mode. Because it has a clutch instead of a torque converter it just ends up slipping the clutch like crazy and it feels odd and laggy. The 9-speed always starts in 1st gear for a much better off the line response in every mode.
  • The second improvement is the revised suspension. Not only does it ride better and is more compliant overall, it's also more dynamic in S+. Partly thanks to the new for the 2019 AMG DYNAMICS system, which is an active driving dynamics control system that expands ESP and improves the handling of the car. Here's more info in the context of the GT, but it's the same system. It was introduced with the GT R Pro and the C63 was the first other model that got it after the Pro: https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaS...l?oid=42956027. This obviously is more of a benefit when you start throwing the car around corners.
  • The third improvement of the S model only is the all-new 9-stage traction control system straight from the GT R. It's rooted in GT racing and came from the AMG GT3. Traction is the biggest Achilles heel of the C63 and the new traction control system does a much better job managing it and working with the driver instead of against them. It's the first traction control system that doesn't annoy me. You don't even have to manually adjust the levels, which is only possible if ESP is off completely anyway, but it just manages the torque so much better to make the most use of the available traction. IMO, it makes the car more enjoyable and useable w/o constantly fighting traction control.
  • Lastly there are a bunch of upgrades to the interior. The 2019 has a newer Infotainment system, with a new UI, widescreen and standard Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The online system also is much better with OTA updates and regular map updates for the navigation system. First 3 years are complimentary. It also has an optional digital instrument cluster which is amazing, IMO and the best part is the new steering wheel with the drive mode selectors that allow you to pretty much adjust anything directly from the steering wheel and not having to take your hands off it. I particularly like that I can just press the drive mode selector knob to instantly activate the Individual mode. All the tech is essentially upgraded. If you get one with the driving assistance features, they are also noticeably improved over the 2018. The 2019 also has new headlight technology if you get one with the upgraded lighting package. They are now an 80 LED matrix that in most markets can darken the areas of oncoming traffic, but unfortunately due to regulations here in the USA we don't' get that functionality. Instead it simulates more traditional adaptive high beams that can turn on/off in segments to not blind oncoming traffic.
  • There are other improvements throughout the car, for example the electronic locking differential is faster acting now and they revised the dynamic engine mounts in the S model, which is partly responsible for the additional comfort in Comfort mode while tightening the drivetrain only when you actually start driving faster and more dynamically.
The main thing the 2019+ gets chewed out for is the slightly tamed exhaust note. It doesn't pop&bang for most of normal driving. You have to drive it aggressively at high rpms to get the theatrics, but this doesn't bother me at all. I prefer the sound of the 2019 overall. To me it's a GT, and if I drive it casually I don't want the theatrics. The US spec models also don't have the particulate filter, which makes the EU models even quieter.
I think looking from the view of a PFL owner superswiss's summary is pretty on spot. Just one comment - the handling (suspension/comfort level), performance (7 vs 9 speed), and amenities (screens, controls, audio...) are all good improvements. Some you will care more or less for depending how you drive, what you value etc. However, the PFL sets a very high baseline and while there are (and rightfully should) be improvements from PFL to FL they are refinements/continuous improvements on the same general platform. Or in other words - only the experienced user would be able detect and appreciate some of the differences during daily use (except the obvious like the entertainment system). So, comes down how much you want to spend and what is important to you - can't go wrong with either the PFL or FL. In my case, if I would not have one already I would also buy a FL (even so I am not big fan of the 9 speed and somewhat neutered tone) - just makes sense to buy the latest gen. But on the other hand, the differences are not compelling enough for me to trade my PFL for FL.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 03:36 PM
  #10  
skratch77's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 381
2005 E55
If you are looking at 19+ cars skip the c63 and get an e63s. It is by far on another level over our car. You are right in the ballpark for a 2018 e63s! Biggest issue with my tuned c63s is traction and the e63s all wheel drive solves that.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 03:51 PM
  #11  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,432
Likes: 5,342
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by skratch77
If you are looking at 19+ cars skip the c63 and get an e63s. It is by far on another level over our car. You are right in the ballpark for a 2018 e63s! Biggest issue with my tuned c63s is traction and the e63s all wheel drive solves that.
I would say that depends on one's perspective. The E63 is larger and most importantly significantly heavier. It adds essentially another 500lbs on top of the C63 sedan, which isn't exactly a lightweight to begin with. If you do the power to weight ratio calculation you'll realize that most of the extra power goes towards moving all that extra weight. It's mainly faster in a straight line due to AWD traction, but it's a land yacht to hustle up a mountain road if you are into that. The E63 is really a German Autobahn rocket mainly. I never found them all that suitable on our roads, unless you are into drag racing. I'd probably go for the GT63 instead. It's the nimbler car due to rear wheel steering making it drive like a smaller car.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 03:52 PM
  #12  
ParadigmDawg's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 881
Likes: 300
AMG GLC 63s Coupe
Originally Posted by skratch77
If you are looking at 19+ cars skip the c63 and get an e63s. It is by far on another level over our car. You are right in the ballpark for a 2018 e63s! Biggest issue with my tuned c63s is traction and the e63s all wheel drive solves that.
Or skip right to the 911s or Taycan....
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 10:17 PM
  #13  
RavenM6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 528
Likes: 135
From: Houston, TX
2010 BMW E63 M6 Coupe 2023 AMG C63s Coupe 2005 YZF-R1
Originally Posted by ParadigmDawg
Why stop at a 63 when you can get a 63s?
Sorry that was a typo. I’m definitely getting the 63s!
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 10:29 PM
  #14  
RavenM6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 528
Likes: 135
From: Houston, TX
2010 BMW E63 M6 Coupe 2023 AMG C63s Coupe 2005 YZF-R1
Originally Posted by superswiss
OP, there are indeed several threads around here discussing the differences and plenty of reviews and videos on the web, but I suppose it can be a bit daunting to weed through all the bias in these threads. So, let me try to summarize the differences at bit. The 2019 is more than a cosmetic grill. It's an updated model.
  • As mentioned above already, the 2019 has a new 9-speed MCT transmission vs the 7-speed MCT transmission in the 2018. I agree with the frequent shifting comment above. That's the nature of a transmission with so many gears as it can keep the engine closer to the optimal rpm as an approximation of a CVT which has infinite gear ratios to keep the engine in the sweet spot at all times. I don't mind the frequent shifting really as I mainly view the automatic modes as convenience for lazy driving and I only use the automatic shifting in Comfort mode. Otherwise, I use manual mode 90+% of the time and the most important improvement for me is the much better and much more responsive manual mode of the 9-speed. If you mainly drive in automatic mode, then the 7-speed will shift less, but I hated the 2nd gear start it does in Comfort mode. Because it has a clutch instead of a torque converter it just ends up slipping the clutch like crazy and it feels odd and laggy. The 9-speed always starts in 1st gear for a much better off the line response in every mode.
  • The second improvement is the revised suspension. Not only does it ride better and is more compliant overall, it's also more dynamic in S+. Partly thanks to the new for the 2019 AMG DYNAMICS system, which is an active driving dynamics control system that expands ESP and improves the handling of the car. Here's more info in the context of the GT, but it's the same system. It was introduced with the GT R Pro and the C63 was the first other model that got it after the Pro: https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaS...l?oid=42956027. This obviously is more of a benefit when you start throwing the car around corners.
  • The third improvement of the S model only is the all-new 9-stage traction control system straight from the GT R. It's rooted in GT racing and came from the AMG GT3. Traction is the biggest Achilles heel of the C63 and the new traction control system does a much better job managing it and working with the driver instead of against them. It's the first traction control system that doesn't annoy me. You don't even have to manually adjust the levels, which is only possible if ESP is off completely anyway, but it just manages the torque so much better to make the most use of the available traction. IMO, it makes the car more enjoyable and useable w/o constantly fighting traction control.
  • Lastly there are a bunch of upgrades to the interior. The 2019 has a newer Infotainment system, with a new UI, widescreen and standard Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The online system also is much better with OTA updates and regular map updates for the navigation system. First 3 years are complimentary. It also has an optional digital instrument cluster which is amazing, IMO and the best part is the new steering wheel with the drive mode selectors that allow you to pretty much adjust anything directly from the steering wheel and not having to take your hands off it. I particularly like that I can just press the drive mode selector knob to instantly activate the Individual mode. All the tech is essentially upgraded. If you get one with the driving assistance features, they are also noticeably improved over the 2018. The 2019 also has new headlight technology if you get one with the upgraded lighting package. They are now an 80 LED matrix that in most markets can darken the areas of oncoming traffic, but unfortunately due to regulations here in the USA we don't' get that functionality. Instead it simulates more traditional adaptive high beams that can turn on/off in segments to not blind oncoming traffic.
  • There are other improvements throughout the car, for example the electronic locking differential is faster acting now and they revised the dynamic engine mounts in the S model, which is partly responsible for the additional comfort in Comfort mode while tightening the drivetrain only when you actually start driving faster and more dynamically.
The main thing the 2019+ gets chewed out for is the slightly tamed exhaust note. It doesn't pop&bang for most of normal driving. You have to drive it aggressively at high rpms to get the theatrics, but this doesn't bother me at all. I prefer the sound of the 2019 overall. To me it's a GT, and if I drive it casually I don't want the theatrics. The US spec models also don't have the particulate filter, which makes the EU models even quieter.
Thanks for such a detailed comparison, I really appreciate it. I never drive my M6 in auto so I’m assuming with a C63S I’d almost exclusively be driving it manually. If you think the automatic mode is a bit wonky on a C63S, the M6 says hold my beer!

So ive narrowed it down to a couple of cars. A 2018 C63s with under 20k miles, or a 2021 that’s virtually brand new. Difference in price is approximately $25k. The 2021 has no HUD or performance exhaust option. I’m so used to using the HUD on my Bimmer so I’m not sure I want to drop nearly $100k on a car that doesn’t have one. The ‘18 has both options but no Car Play which is not that big a deal as I’ve read there are aftermarket mods to address that. Big decisions to be made, and soon before I miss out!
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 10:35 PM
  #15  
RavenM6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 528
Likes: 135
From: Houston, TX
2010 BMW E63 M6 Coupe 2023 AMG C63s Coupe 2005 YZF-R1
Originally Posted by skratch77
2017s sound the best! And 2015 was first year model!
I’ve been hearing that too! By first year I meant first year of the W205 FL.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 11:18 PM
  #16  
mischief's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 222
Likes: 35
From: DFW
W205 AMG
Originally Posted by RavenM6
Thanks for such a detailed comparison, I really appreciate it. I never drive my M6 in auto so I’m assuming with a C63S I’d almost exclusively be driving it manually. If you think the automatic mode is a bit wonky on a C63S, the M6 says hold my beer!

So ive narrowed it down to a couple of cars. A 2018 C63s with under 20k miles, or a 2021 that’s virtually brand new. Difference in price is approximately $25k. The 2021 has no HUD or performance exhaust option. I’m so used to using the HUD on my Bimmer so I’m not sure I want to drop nearly $100k on a car that doesn’t have one. The ‘18 has both options but no Car Play which is not that big a deal as I’ve read there are aftermarket mods to address that. Big decisions to be made, and soon before I miss out!
PE is std on the FL C63s.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 11:26 PM
  #17  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,432
Likes: 5,342
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by RavenM6
Thanks for such a detailed comparison, I really appreciate it. I never drive my M6 in auto so I’m assuming with a C63S I’d almost exclusively be driving it manually. If you think the automatic mode is a bit wonky on a C63S, the M6 says hold my beer!

So ive narrowed it down to a couple of cars. A 2018 C63s with under 20k miles, or a 2021 that’s virtually brand new. Difference in price is approximately $25k. The 2021 has no HUD or performance exhaust option. I’m so used to using the HUD on my Bimmer so I’m not sure I want to drop nearly $100k on a car that doesn’t have one. The ‘18 has both options but no Car Play which is not that big a deal as I’ve read there are aftermarket mods to address that. Big decisions to be made, and soon before I miss out!
Oh, yeah, the SMG is a whole other can of worms. FYI...the performance exhaust is standard on the FL. I'm not a fan of the HUD. Partly because I wear polarized sunglasses and partly because I simply don't like stuff floating in my line of sight. I've driven a few cars, including BMWs with HUD and I always ended up turning it off. The AMG HUD has one good feature that would have been nice. The Track Pace app projects the track and braking zones into the HUD, so that would have been cool on the Nurburgring. I did European Delivery with mine. As for CarPlay, yes there are aftermarket solutions, but personally not a fan of that.

Originally Posted by RavenM6
I’ve been hearing that too! By first year I meant first year of the W205 FL.
I don't consider the FL a first year anything. It just so happened that I always ended up buying the FL of every car I've ever owned the year it came out. In the software business we have a saying that you should skip version 1 and wait for version 2. The PFL in this scenario would be version 1 and the FL version 2. The FL essentially takes the learnings, feedback etc. from the PFL and improves upon the initial car. Fixing things that weren't quite right, incorporating new technologies that weren't quite ready when the car was initially released and revised parts. Yes, there can still be kinks specific to the FL. In fact there was a recall for the ESP and a couple of coding issues with the AMG Drive Unit, but they were all taken care of with software updates. I also had an issue with the Aero package side skirts, which were glued on from the factory, but started to come off. AMG eventually released a revised part that screws on instead and I've had those on mine for a while now. So the 2019 is a sold choice at this point, just make sure it has all the recalls and service campaigns done.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2021 | 11:56 PM
  #18  
RavenM6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 528
Likes: 135
From: Houston, TX
2010 BMW E63 M6 Coupe 2023 AMG C63s Coupe 2005 YZF-R1
Originally Posted by superswiss
Oh, yeah, the SMG is a whole other can of worms. FYI...the performance exhaust is standard on the FL. I'm not a fan of the HUD. Partly because I wear polarized sunglasses and partly because I simply don't like stuff floating in my line of sight. I've driven a few cars, including BMWs with HUD and I always ended up turning it off. The AMG HUD has one good feature that would have been nice. The Track Pace app projects the track and braking zones into the HUD, so that would have been cool on the Nurburgring. I did European Delivery with mine. As for CarPlay, yes there are aftermarket solutions, but personally not a fan of that.



I don't consider the FL a first year anything. It just so happened that I always ended up buying the FL of every car I've ever owned the year it came out. In the software business we have a saying that you should skip version 1 and wait for version 2. The PFL in this scenario would be version 1 and the FL version 2. The FL essentially takes the learnings, feedback etc. from the PFL and improves upon the initial car. Fixing things that weren't quite right, incorporating new technologies that weren't quite ready when the car was initially released and revised parts. Yes, there can still be kinks specific to the FL. In fact there was a recall for the ESP and a couple of coding issues with the AMG Drive Unit, but they were all taken care of with software updates. I also had an issue with the Aero package side skirts, which were glued on from the factory, but started to come off. AMG eventually released a revised part that screws on instead and I've had those on mine for a while now. So the 2019 is a sold choice at this point, just make sure it has all the recalls and service campaigns done.
I guess that explains why I didn’t see performance exhaust on the added options list when I was looking over the spec sheet. I suppose I can overlook the HUD option, from what I’ve seen, not many C63s owners opted for one.

After reading all your input, I think I’m really leaning towards the FL. It almost seems like it’s a totally different car with all the upgrades and standard options that are included. I’ll be making my final decision tomorrow.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2021 | 03:06 AM
  #19  
'1663s's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 124
Likes: 21
C63s
IMHO, the HUD is a must, and was a deal breaker option for me when buying my PFL. I passed on many cars that were not equipped with it. Your eyes never need to leave the road, which to me is a better than any "modern" safety feature (emergency breaking/lane keep assist/other b.s. nannies). PFL HUD is super basic, extremely simple. The FL HUD is leaps and bounds better. I wouldn't pull the trigger on a car without it without seeing it for yourself.

I also think you'd end up better in the end with a FL car. Not only is it newer, but it has lots of cool/fun features over the PFL. I so wish I had the 9 stage traction control. Like Superswiss said it prevents you from having to fight the car. PFL and it's 3 stages of TC rain on my parade alllll the time.

Last edited by '1663s; Jun 18, 2021 at 03:17 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2021 | 09:26 AM
  #20  
tobeit's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 424
From: Florida
AMG C63s
Originally Posted by '1663s
IMHO, the HUD is a must, and was a deal breaker option for me when buying my PFL. I passed on many cars that were not equipped with it. Your eyes never need to leave the road, which to me is a better than any "modern" safety feature (emergency breaking/lane keep assist/other b.s. nannies). PFL HUD is super basic, extremely simple. The FL HUD is leaps and bounds better. I wouldn't pull the trigger on a car without it without seeing it for yourself.

I also think you'd end up better in the end with a FL car. Not only is it newer, but it has lots of cool/fun features over the PFL. I so wish I had the 9 stage traction control. Like Superswiss said it prevents you from having to fight the car. PFL and it's 3 stages of TC rain on my parade alllll the time.
I think you dramatically over emphasize the usefulness of any HUD. I have it and its cool. But a) like someone said its close to useless when wearing polarized sunglasses (and that is about 100% at daytime here) and b) do you really look at your instruments while driving that often? I sure don't - an occasional check for temp and maybe checking fuel before I go and that's it. Don't look at it for speed (often dont care as I drive as it pleases me and in city I don't need to look at the speedo to know if I am speeding or not), rpm. and whatever is shown while driving? I use the HUD sometimes for navigation but even here I simply listen to the voice instructions more than looking at the map. In many ways I found the entire instrument cluster is most useful for when I am not driving to check on engine status, or when I load tunes etc but when I drive I barely look at it. Mostly eye candy to me.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2021 | 12:07 PM
  #21  
superswiss's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
5 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 11,432
Likes: 5,342
From: San Francisco Bay Area
2019 C63CS
Originally Posted by tobeit
I think you dramatically over emphasize the usefulness of any HUD. I have it and its cool. But a) like someone said its close to useless when wearing polarized sunglasses (and that is about 100% at daytime here) and b) do you really look at your instruments while driving that often? I sure don't - an occasional check for temp and maybe checking fuel before I go and that's it. Don't look at it for speed (often dont care as I drive as it pleases me and in city I don't need to look at the speedo to know if I am speeding or not), rpm. and whatever is shown while driving? I use the HUD sometimes for navigation but even here I simply listen to the voice instructions more than looking at the map. In many ways I found the entire instrument cluster is most useful for when I am not driving to check on engine status, or when I load tunes etc but when I drive I barely look at it. Mostly eye candy to me.
That's pretty much spot on. To me, HUD technology is deeply flawed, because it relies on the reflection properties of glass. The reason I wear polarized sunglasses is to cut out glare and undesired reflections from the windshield. The problem is the HUD image is technically glare. It's light reflected horizontally from the windshield, so like the undesired reflections most of it gets blocked by polarized sunglasses. I don't know about others, but I drove manual transmissions for almost 20 years. As part of that I learned to drive by ear and feel. Like @tobeit I don't look at the instrument cluster very much. I can tell by ear and feel and just looking out the windshield approximately how fast I'm going, and what gear I'm in and when I need to shift. Once you are in tune with the car, you don't need to constantly see your actual speed etc. The only time I need to know the exact rpms for example is when I'm accelerating hard in manual mode and need to make sure I upshift before running into the rev limiter, but that's when the excellent shift lights of the digital instrument cluster in the FL come into play. The entire cluster flashes red when it's time to shift and that can easily be seen in one's peripheral vision.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2021 | 03:46 PM
  #22  
ParadigmDawg's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 881
Likes: 300
AMG GLC 63s Coupe
Originally Posted by superswiss
That's pretty much spot on. To me, HUD technology is deeply flawed, because it relies on the reflection properties of glass. The reason I wear polarized sunglasses is to cut out glare and undesired reflections from the windshield. The problem is the HUD image is technically glare. It's light reflected horizontally from the windshield, so like the undesired reflections most of it gets blocked by polarized sunglasses. I don't know about others, but I drove manual transmissions for almost 20 years. As part of that I learned to drive by ear and feel. Like @tobeit I don't look at the instrument cluster very much. I can tell by ear and feel and just looking out the windshield approximately how fast I'm going, and what gear I'm in and when I need to shift. Once you are in tune with the car, you don't need to constantly see your actual speed etc. The only time I need to know the exact rpms for example is when I'm accelerating hard in manual mode and need to make sure I upshift before running into the rev limiter, but that's when the excellent shift lights of the digital instrument cluster in the FL come into play. The entire cluster flashes red when it's time to shift and that can easily be seen in one's peripheral vision.
Agreed. I had it on my Bimmer and never looked at it. Mainly because I couldn't see it with polarized sunglasses but still....Never though about ordering it on any other car.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2021 | 09:14 PM
  #23  
RavenM6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 528
Likes: 135
From: Houston, TX
2010 BMW E63 M6 Coupe 2023 AMG C63s Coupe 2005 YZF-R1
I decided to go with the FL, a 2021 that’s barely broken in yet. The deal isn’t final yet but I’m comfortable that it was the right decision. The differences were just too many and significant to overlook. If I opt for the PFL, I’ll always be second guessing my decision. I can overlook the HUD. It’s mostly a night time feature since I can barely see mine during the day when I always wear sunglasses. I wish it could be retrofitted but the cost would be astronomical so I’ll just have to get used to driving without it.

There’s a very limited amount of 2021’s left for sale in the country so I feel owning one is like owning a piece of history and art. They might even appreciate one day being that this is the final production year of the C63 v8. I know, wishful thinking but you never know!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2021 | 11:08 PM
  #24  
RavenM6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 528
Likes: 135
From: Houston, TX
2010 BMW E63 M6 Coupe 2023 AMG C63s Coupe 2005 YZF-R1
Quick question for superswiss or anyone that might know. Did all the Fl’s come with the 64 color ambient lighting standard or did they add that standard for MY 2021?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2021 | 11:16 PM
  #25  
mischief's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 222
Likes: 35
From: DFW
W205 AMG
Originally Posted by RavenM6
Quick question for superswiss or anyone that might know. Did all the Fl’s come with the 64 color ambient lighting standard or did they add that standard for MY 2021?
the 64 colour ambient lighting became available with the FL. It was an option in ‘19 and became standard in ‘20.

3 colour ambient lighting was available in the PFL models.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE